Bills › 89th General Assembly
Concerning county supervisor representation plans, and including effective date provisions
Topics:Cities & counties
Same legislation: HF 218
Where it is now
- Done: IntroducedJanuary 25, 2021
- Done: SubcommitteeJanuary 28, 2021
- Stopped: Senate committeeDied when the General Assembly ended
- Next: Passes the Senate
- Next: House committee
- Next: Passes the House
- Next: To the Governor
- Next: Signed into law
Died when the session ended The 2022 session adjourned on May 24, 2022, the General Assembly’s last regular session. Bills that didn’t pass both chambers died. What’s a funnel?
What’s in it
AI summary Counties in Iowa with at least 60,000 people must use a specific system to elect their board of supervisors. Under this system, voters choose individual supervisors from districts that have an equal number of people. Large counties that do not already use this method have until after the next census to switch over.1
Read the official explanation
This bill requires a county with a population of 60,000 or more based on the most recent federal decennial census to use plan “three” for the election of county supervisors. Plan “three” requires individual members of the board of supervisors for that county to be elected from single-member equal-population districts. The bill provides that a county with a population of 60,000 or more as of the effective date of the bill that does not use plan “three” for the election of supervisors shall not be required to elect supervisors under plan “three” until the election for supervisors after the adoption of a county supervisor representation plan following the federal decennial census taken in 2020. The bill takes effect upon enactment.
Senate subcommittee
Named January 28, 2021. It hasn’t reported yet.
- Sen. R. Smith
- Sen. Tony Bisignano DEmail
- Sen. Chris Cournoyer R
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Iowa Code it changes
Lobbying
1 for · 2 against · 3 undecided · Who →
Family tree
Tried before
89th General Assembly
Picked up later
Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.
Tried before
This idea has been filed in an earlier General Assembly. None got through a chamber.
- HF 216 Concerning county supervisor representation plans88th General Assembly · In committee · nearly identicalCleared committee
Similar bills this General Assembly
- SF 2061 Relating to county supervisor representation plans, and including effective date provision…90th General Assembly · In committeeVery similar
- HF 2466 Concerning signature requirements for county supervisor candidate nominations and includin…89th General Assembly · Signed by GovernorSimilar
- HF 116 Concerning county supervisor representation plans and including effective date provisions90th General Assembly · Renumbered as HF 281Similar
- SF 2283 Relating to county supervisors, concerning county supervisor representation plans and coun…90th General Assembly · Approved by committeeSimilar
- SF 2439 Relating to county supervisors, concerning county supervisor representation plans and coun…90th General Assembly · Passed SenateSimilar
Matched by wording or an identical title.