Bills › 89th General Assembly
Where it is now
- Done: IntroducedFebruary 3, 2022
- Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 3, 2022
- Done: House committeeFebruary 15, 2022
- Skipped: Passes the HouseContinued as HF 2466
- Next: Senate committee
- Next: Passes the Senate
- Next: To the Governor
- Next: Signed into law
Became HF 2466 → Its progress continues under the new number. Go to HF 2466 What’s a funnel?
What’s in it
AI summary Counties in Iowa with at least 60,000 people must use a specific system called plan three to elect their supervisors. Under this plan, supervisors are chosen from individual districts that all have roughly the same number of people. If a large county is not already using this system, they have until the 2024 election to switch over.1
Read the official explanation
This bill requires a county with a population of 60,000 or more based on the most recent federal decennial census to use plan “three” for the election of county supervisors. H.F. _____ Plan “three” requires individual members of the board of supervisors for that county to be elected from single-member equal-population districts. The bill provides that a county with a population of 60,000 or more as of July 1, 2022, that does not use plan “three” as of that date for the election of supervisors shall not be required to elect supervisors under plan “three” until the election for supervisors in 2024 following adoption of a representation plan in conformity with the provisions of law governing the adoption of a plan “three” representation plan.
Changed since by amendment H-8184; see Amendments.
House subcommittee
Named February 3, 2022. On February 10, 2022 it recommended amendment and passage. Vote Total: 2-0.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Fiscal note
AI summary This bill requires counties with a population of 60,000 or more to use a specific plan for electing county supervisors and to establish temporary redistricting commissions. The bill is estimated to increase county supervisor election costs by a minimum of $250,000 in 2024 due to the setup of additional precinct locations. Other potential costs related to ballot stratification cannot be estimated at this time.3
Read the fiscal note
Description
House File 2466 relates to county redistricting plans and does the following:
- Requires counties with a population of 60,000 or more to use plan “three” for the election of county supervisors.
- Eliminates a provision allowing counties with a population of 60,000 or more that elect supervisors under plan “three” to change their plan pursuant to a special election.
- Permits counties with a population of 60,000 or more that do not currently use plan “three” to delay the transition until the 2024 election for county supervisors.
- Requires counties with a population of 60,000 or more to establish a temporary county redistricting commission by May 15, 2023. A county redistricting commission must submit its plan for transition to plan “three” by November 1, 2023. The plan would become effective January 1, 2024.
Background
Currently, county redistricting plans are selected by the county board of supervisors or by a special election as provided in Iowa Code section 331.207. The three types of plans are as follows:
- Plan “one” — Election at large without district residence requirements for the members.
- Plan “two” — Election at large but with equal-population district residence requirements for the members.
- Plan “three” — Election from single-member equal-population districts, in which the electors of each district elect one member, who must reside in that district.
There are 10 counties that have a population of 60,000 or more: Polk, Linn, Scott, Johnson, Black Hawk, Woodbury, Dallas, Dubuque, Story, and Pottawattamie. Under this Bill, 6 of these 10 counties would need to change from plan “one” to plan “three”: Scott, Johnson, Black Hawk, Dubuque, Story, and Pottawattamie. Two of the ten counties would need to change from plan “two” to plan “three”: Woodbury and Dallas. The remaining two counties, Polk and Linn, currently use plan “three.”
Assumptions
All affected counties:
- The 10 counties that are required to use plan “three” going forward will use the plan “three” representation plan from calendar year 2024 onward.
- Ongoing equipment and staffing costs are not included in the estimate. Estimates for plan “one” counties assume the following:
- The 6 counties that currently use plan “one” may expand the number of precincts they currently have.
- Each polling location is estimated to cost approximately $50,000 to set up initially.
- Dubuque County will need to set up four additional precinct locations.
- Black Hawk County will need to set up at least one additional precinct location.
- The need for additional precinct locations is unknown for Scott County, Johnson County, Story County, and Pottawattamie County.
Estimates for plan “two” counties assume the following:
- The cost associated with the additional stratification of ballots is unknown.
- These counties will not need additional polling locations to move to plan “three.” Estimates for plan “three” counties assume the following:
- There are no additional costs for plan “three” counties to continue to use plan “three.”
Fiscal Impact
The Bill is estimated to increase county supervisor election costs by a minimum of $250,000 in 2024. The cost is derived from the setup of additional precinct locations. There may be additional precinct locations that need setup; however, these expenses are unknown. There may also be additional costs related to further stratification of ballots; however, this cost cannot be estimated at this time.
Source
- Iowa State Association of Counties
- County Redistricting Plans · March 14, 2022 · $250,000
Iowa Code it changes
Lobbying
4 for · 4 against · 7 undecided · Who →
Family tree
Study bill
89th General Assembly
Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.
Similar bills
- SF 2061 Relating to county supervisor representation plans, and including effective date provision…90th General Assembly · In committeeVery similar
- SF 2283 Relating to county supervisors, concerning county supervisor representation plans and coun…90th General Assembly · Approved by committeeVery similar
- HF 116 Concerning county supervisor representation plans and including effective date provisions90th General Assembly · Renumbered as HF 281Very similar
- SF 2439 Relating to county supervisors, concerning county supervisor representation plans and coun…90th General Assembly · Passed SenateSimilar
- HF 218 Concerning county supervisor representation plans, and including effective date provisions89th General Assembly · Subcommittee recommends passageSimilar
Matched by wording or an identical title.