Proyectos de ley › 88.ª Asamblea General

Relating to the standard of judicial review and providing a claim or defense when a state action burdens a person’s exercise of religion, and including effective date provisions

Temas:Courts & civil lawCities & counties

La misma legislación: HF 258, SF 508

Dónde está ahora

  1. Hecho: Presentado6 de febrero de 2019
  2. Hecho: Subcomité13 de febrero de 2019
  3. Hecho: Comité del Senado6 de marzo de 2019
  4. Se saltó: Lo aprueba el SenadoSigue como SF 508
  5. Sigue: Comité de la Cámara
  6. Sigue: Lo aprueba la Cámara
  7. Sigue: A gobernador(a)
  8. Sigue: Firmado como ley

Ahora es SF 508 → Sigue avanzando con el número nuevo. Ir a SF 508 ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?

Qué contiene

La explicación oficial está en inglés; todavía no hay resumen en palabras sencillas.

This bill relates to the standard of judicial review when a state action burdens a person’s exercise of religion. Under current law, a court is not required to apply heightened scrutiny when reviewing a law that burdens a person’s exercise of religion when such law is generally applicable. The bill provides that a court shall apply the compelling interest test set forth in Sherbert v. 398 (1963) and Wisconsin v. 205 (1972) in such cases, so that state action cannot substantially burden a person’s exercise of religion unless it is demonstrated that applying the law of general applicability is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest and is the least restrictive means of furthering that interest.

Lea la explicación completa

The bill provides that a person whose exercise of religion has been burdened by state action may assert such violation as a claim or defense in a judicial or administrative proceeding. The bill does not apply to the department of corrections, a district department of correctional services, a county jail, or other detention facility. The bill takes effect upon enactment.

Texto completo del proyecto (en inglés)1

Senate subcommittee

Named February 13, 2019. It hasn’t reported yet.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)

Crea§675.1§675.2§675.3§675.4§675.5§675.6

Cómo funciona el Código2

Cabildeo

5 a favor · 33 en contra · 7 indecisos · Quiénes →

Family tree

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.

Similar bills

  • SF 436 Relating to the standard of judicial review and providing a claim or defense when a state …
    89th General Assembly · Subcommittee recommends passage
    Nearly identical
  • HF 229 Relating to the standard of judicial review and providing a claim or defense when a state …
    90th General Assembly · In committee
    Very similar

Matched by wording or an identical title.