Iowa Supreme Court · No. 24-1309
Dr. Paul R. Gausman v. Sioux City Community School District, Daniel D. Greenwell, Jan George, Taylor Goodvin, and Bob Michaelson
Decided April 17, 2026 · appeal from Woodbury County · Government
What the court decided
AI summary A former superintendent sued a school district and several board members, claiming they violated the Iowa Open Meetings Act during certain meetings. The court reviewed whether specific closed sessions were legal and whether the superintendent was entitled to attorney fees. The court reversed the district court's decision on the school district's appeal and affirmed the decision on the superintendent's cross-appeal.1
Result: Reversed; Cross-Appeal Affirmed
The court’s own summary
Former superintendent of the Sioux City Community School District brought this action against the District and four of its school board members for alleged violations of Iowa’s Open Meetings Act. The District appeals the district court’s orders finding that a portion of a closed session meeting exceeded the scope of an evaluation of professional competency under Iowa Code section 21.5(1)(i), that the former board president was not entitled to the safe harbor protections of the Act, and that the superintendent was entitled to attorney fees and costs totaling $52,704.86. The superintendent cross-appeals, arguing the district court erred in finding that a different closed session meeting complied with the Act.
Holding: A school board appeals and a former superintendent cross appeals from a district court order involving the legality of two school board meetings under the Iowa Open Meetings Act. Appeal Reversed; Cross-Appeal Affirmed.
Judges
- Written by Justice Christopher McDonald
- Trial judge: Jeffrey A. Neary, Woodbury County
Iowa Code it cites
§21.1§21.3§21.5§21.6§256.158§272.13§272C.6§279.23A
Each links to the bills that change that chapter.