Iowa Supreme Court · No. 24-0453
J. Doe v. Iowa District Court for Polk County
Decided November 7, 2025 · appeal from Polk County · Government
What the court decided
AI summary A person sought to have both a misdemeanor conviction and a dismissed charge removed from their criminal record. The district court refused to expunge the dismissed charge because it was not a conviction. The supreme court decided to review this decision and sent the case back to the lower court for further proceedings.1
Result: Writ Sustained and Case Remanded
The court’s own summary
J. Doe was charged in a two-count trial information with disorderly conduct, a simple misdemeanor (count I), and child endangerment, an aggravated misdemeanor (count II). Doe was subsequently convicted of count I and count II was dismissed. Several years later, Doe filed an application to expunge pursuant to Iowa Code section 901C.3. The district court granted the application as to count I only. Doe subsequently filed a motion to implement expungement under Iowa Rule of Criminal Procedure 2.84(4) seeking to expunge both counts. The district court denied Doe’s motion on the basis that count II was a dismissal, not a conviction, and thus could not be expunged under section 901C.3. The supreme court granted Doe’s petition for writ of certiorari.
Holding: The plaintiff petitions the district court’s denial of a motion to implement an expungement. Writ Sustained and Case Remanded.
Judges
- Written by Justice Christopher McDonald
- Trial judge: Jesse Ramirez, Polk County
Iowa Code it cites
§22.7§4.1§4.6§708.2A§723.4§726.6§901C.1§901C.2§901C.3§907.1§907.9
Each links to the bills that change that chapter.