Iowa Supreme Court · No. 24-0409

State of Iowa v. Rodney Dee Brown

Decided February 27, 2026 · appeal from Clinton County · Criminal

What the court decided

AI summary The defendant challenged his conviction for attempting to entice a minor, arguing that the jury was not properly instructed on the law and that there was not enough evidence to prove his intent. The court affirmed the previous decisions of the district and appeals courts. This means the defendant's conviction remains in place.1

Result: Decision of Court of Appeals and District Court Judgment Affirmed

The court’s own summary

Rodney Dee Brown seeks further review of a court of appeals opinion affirming his conviction for attempting to entice a minor in violation of Iowa Code section 710.10(4)(2023), an aggravated misdemeanor. The court of appeals rejected his arguments that the district court committed reversible error in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “illegal act” in the context of a violation of Iowa Code section 710.10(4), and that there was insufficient evidence to support the criminal conviction for attempt to entice a minor because the State failed to prove the alleged acts were committed with the specific intent to commit an illegal or unlawful act upon or with the alleged victim.

Holding: The defendant challenges the jury instructions and sufficiency of the evidence. Decision of Court of Appeals and District Court Judgment Affirmed.

Read the opinion (PDF) · Case page on iowacourts.gov

Judges

Iowa Code it cites

§704.1§708.1§708.11§710.1§710.10§713.1§814.28

Each links to the bills that change that chapter.