Iowa Supreme Court · No. 24-0169

State of Iowa v. Dillon Michael Heiller

Decided March 20, 2026 · appeal from Allamakee County · Criminal

What the court decided

AI summary The defendant appealed two theft convictions, arguing that the evidence showed he only possessed the vehicles rather than actually taking them. He also argued that the state did not have the authority to prosecute him because the crimes happened outside of Iowa. The court vacated the previous decision and sent the case back to the lower court for further action.1

Result: Decision of Court of Appeals Vacated; District Court Judgment Affirmed in Part, Reversed in Part, and Case Remanded

The court’s own summary

The State charged Dillon Heiller with three counts of theft for stealing three vehicles. The State prosecuted each count on a theft by taking theory, and Heiller was convicted of two of the three counts. On appeal, Heiller argued that the evidence was insufficient to support either conviction because there was no evidence that he actually took the vehicles, as opposed to merely possessing them. As to one theft, Heiller argued that the State lacked territorial jurisdiction to prosecute him because the evidence showed that the crime occurred wholly outside the state of Iowa. The court of appeals held that the evidence was sufficient and that Heiller did not preserve error on his territorial jurisdiction challenge. Heiller sought further review.

Holding: The defendant appeals two theft convictions, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict. Decision of Court of Appeals Vacated; District Court Judgment Affirmed in Part, Reversed in Part, and Case Remanded.

Read the opinion (PDF) · Case page on iowacourts.gov

Judges

Iowa Code it cites

§714.1§714.2§714.7§803.1§816.1

Each links to the bills that change that chapter.