Daniel Murillo v. State of Iowa

Daniel Murillo seeks further review of the court of appeals’ decision affirming the district court’s denial of his application for removal from the sex offender registry. He argues that the court of appeals erred when it determined Mr. Murillo had not completed his court-ordered sex offender treatment programming, and thus should not be removed from the registry.

Holding: Required sex offender registrant seeks further review of a court of appeals decision affirming the denial of his application for modification of his registry requirements. Decision of Court of Appeals Vacated; District Court Judgment Affirmed.