District court, Judicial District 3

Steven J. Andreasen

District Court Judge · District 3B

About

  • Appointed to this post in 20081
  • Next on the ballot: November 2028, in District 3B2

Judge Andreasen was appointed as a district judge in January 2008. He had served as a magistrate in Woodbury County in 2006 and 2007 before his appointment to the bench. He received his undergraduate degree from the University of Iowa in 1989 and his law degree from the same institution…

Full biography on iowacourts.gov

Retention votes

ElectionYesNoKept by
November 8, 202233,1209,43277.8% yes

What lawyers said

Before each retention vote, the Iowa State Bar Association asks lawyers who’ve appeared before the judge to rate them from 1 (very poor) to 5 (excellent), and whether the judge should be kept.3

95% of 81 responding lawyers said to keep the judge (2022).

Question2022
Knowledge and use of the law4.64
Sees the facts of a case clearly4.61
On time for court4.60
Listens to arguments and testimony4.72
Runs the courtroom well4.71
Temperament and manner4.76
Clear, well-written decisions4.59
Rules promptly2.77
Uses technology to improve the courts4.49
Avoids needless personal criticism4.72
Decides on the law and facts, not outside pressure4.75
Courteous and patient4.80
Treats people equally4.82
Fair to people without a lawyer4.77
Said to keep the judge95%
Lawyers responding81

Source: Iowa State Bar Association Judicial Performance Review: 2022 (page 31).

Appeals from this judge’s cases

2 appeals on record; 1 reversed or vacated at least in part.4

  • Criminal appeal No. 24-1563
    Iowa Supreme Court · October 9, 2026 · Woodbury County · Court of appeals decision and district court judgment affirmed
    AI summary The defendant challenged his conviction for sexual abuse, arguing that a video of the incident should not have been allowed as evidence in court. The court affirmed the lower court's decision to admit the video, finding that the evidence was properly authentic…
  • Criminal appeal No. 24-0053
    Iowa Supreme Court · February 14, 2025 · Woodbury County · Sentence Vacated in Part and Case Remanded for Resentencing
    AI summary The defendant appealed his sentence for a felony conviction, arguing that the fine was incorrect and that the prohibition on owning a firearm was unconstitutional. The court vacated part of the sentence and sent the case back to the lower court for resentencin…