District court, Judicial District 5
Michael K. Jacobsen
District Court Judge · District 5A · Jasper County
About
Judge Jacobsen, Jasper County, was appointed to the bench in June 2018. He received his bachelor's degree in History and Political Science from South Dakota State University in 1990 and his Juris Doctorate from Drake in 1993. Prior to his appointment to the bench, Judge Jacobsen was in private practice…
Retention votes
| Election | Yes | No | Kept by |
|---|---|---|---|
| November 3, 2026 | 63,513 | 26,928 | 70.2% yes |
What lawyers said
Before each retention vote, the Iowa State Bar Association asks lawyers who’ve appeared before the judge to rate them from 1 (very poor) to 5 (excellent), and whether the judge should be kept.3
97% of 101 responding lawyers said to keep the judge (2026).
| Question | 2026 |
|---|---|
| Knowledge and use of the law | 4.4 |
| Sees the facts of a case clearly | 4.4 |
| On time for court | 4.6 |
| Listens to arguments and testimony | 4.6 |
| Runs the courtroom well | 4.6 |
| Temperament and manner | 4.6 |
| Clear, well-written decisions | 4.4 |
| Rules promptly | 4.5 |
| Uses technology to improve the courts | 4.6 |
| Avoids needless personal criticism | 4.5 |
| Decides on the law and facts, not outside pressure | 4.5 |
| Courteous and patient | 4.6 |
| Treats people equally | 4.6 |
| Fair to people without a lawyer | 4.5 |
| Said to keep the judge | 97% |
| Lawyers responding | 101 |
Source: Iowa State Bar Association Judicial Performance Review: 2026 (page 40).
Appeals from this judge’s cases
2 appeals on record; 1 reversed or vacated at least in part.4
- Criminal appeal No. 23-2016AI summary The defendant appealed his prison sentence after failing to meet a condition in a plea agreement to purchase a home. The court of appeals had previously dismissed the appeal, but the Iowa Supreme Court has now overturned that decision. The case is being sent b…
- Criminal appeal No. 25-0442AI summary The defendant appealed her conviction for making a threat of terrorism, arguing that there was not enough evidence to prove her actions caused fear or posed an imminent threat. The court affirmed the conviction. This means the original decision finding the def…