Bills › 91st General Assembly
Relating to the authority of counties and cities to regulate the installation or use of battery-charged security alarm systems on nonresidential properties
Where it is now
- Done: IntroducedFebruary 4, 2026
- Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 4, 2026
- Done: Senate committeeFebruary 12, 2026
- Skipped: Passes the SenateContinued as SF 2340
- Next: House committee
- Next: Passes the House
- Next: To the Governor
- Next: Signed into law
Became SF 2340 → Its progress continues under the new number. Go to SF 2340 What’s a funnel?
What’s in it
AI summary Local governments would no longer be allowed to treat certain battery-powered security alarms as fences or require special fence permits for them on business properties. As long as these systems meet specific safety and height rules, cities and counties cannot use zoning or building codes to ban them. This change only applies to nonresidential property and does not affect homes used only for living.1
Read the official explanation
3 provide limitations on the powers of counties and cities, respectively. _____ of battery-charged security alarm systems under certain circumstances. The bill defines “battery-charged security alarm system” as an outdoor alarm system that interfaces with an alarm system in a manner that enables the outdoor alarm system to cause the connected alarm system to transmit a signal intended to alert the business and a monitoring station operator in response to a burglary or attempted burglary, is energized by a commercial storage battery not exceeding volts direct current and designed to periodically deliver voltage impulses to the outdoor alarm system, and includes a battery-charging device used exclusively to charge the battery. The bill provides that a county or city shall not consider a battery-charged security alarm system to be a fence or to be subject to regulation by fence codes, and shall not require a fence permit for the installation or use of a battery-charged security alarm system on property that is not used exclusively for residential purposes. The bill further provides that a county or city shall not adopt, enforce, or apply any ordinance, building code, zoning regulation, or other requirement that prohibits or otherwise regulates the installation or use of a battery-charged security alarm system on nonresidential property, provided that the system complies with all of the following requirements: (1) the energizer is certified to meet the current international electrotechnical commission standard 60335-2-76, or a successor standard; (2) the battery-charged security alarm system is located behind a nonelectric perimeter fence or wall that is not less than feet in height; (3) the battery-charged security alarm system is the greater of feet in height or feet higher than the surrounding nonelectric perimeter fence or wall; and (4) warning signs, in capitalized type, reading “WARNING —— ELECTRIC FENCE” or substantially similar language are posted at intervals not greater than feet along the fence. _____ residential purposes. The bill specifies that a county or city may only require an alarm system operator license or permit for battery-charged security alarm systems in the same manner as is required for any other security alarm systems. The bill specifies that nothing in the bill shall be construed to apply to security alarm systems that do not meet the definition of “battery-charged security alarm system”.
Senate subcommittee
Named February 4, 2026. On February 11, 2026 it recommended passage.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
1 written public comment to its subcommittee: February 10, 2026 (1) · on the Legislature’s site
Iowa Code it changes
Lobbying
3 for · 1 against · 13 undecided · Who →
Family tree
Study bill
91st General Assembly