Bills › 91st General Assembly

Relating to the ownership of artificial intelligence output and trained artificial intelligence

Topics:Technology & privacyArtificial intelligence

Same legislation: HSB 635, SF 2199, HF 2691

Write your legislators about it

Also covers HSB 635 and SF 2199 and HF 2691.

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedJanuary 13, 2026
  2. Done: SubcommitteeJanuary 13, 2026
  3. Done: Senate committeeFebruary 4, 2026
  4. Skipped: Passes the SenateContinued as SF 2199
  5. Next: House committee
  6. Next: Passes the House
  7. Next: To the Governor
  8. Next: Signed into law

Became SF 2199 → Its progress continues under the new number. Go to SF 2199 What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

AI summary People who use artificial intelligence to create something would own the results, as long as they aren't breaking anyone else's copyright rules. If someone trains an AI using legal data, they own the resulting AI unless they have a contract saying otherwise. However, if an employee uses AI as part of their job, their employer would own the output or the trained AI under certain conditions.1

Read the official explanation

This bill relates to the ownership of artificial intelligence output and trained artificial intelligence. The bill defines “artificial intelligence”, “input”, “output”, “train”, and “user”. The bill makes a user who provides input to an artificial intelligence (AI) the owner of the output generated by the AI that was based on the user’s input, provided that the output does not infringe on a third party’s existing copyrights or intellectual property rights. The bill makes a person that trains an AI the owner of AI that results from the training if the training data was lawfully acquired and used for training purposes and the person has not transferred ownership rights of the resulting AI through a contract or agreement. _____ If a person uses AI as a part of the person’s employment duties, the bill makes the resulting output or trained AI the property of the person’s employer if certain conditions detailed in the bill are met. The bill shall not be construed to grant ownership of property if such a grant of ownership would infringe on a preexisting copyright or other intellectual property right.

Full bill text2

Senate subcommittee

Named January 13, 2026. On February 3, 2026 it recommended passage.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Iowa Code it changes

Creates§554J.1§554J.2

How the Code works3

Lobbying

2 for · 7 against · 25 undecided · Who →

Family tree