Bills › 91st General Assembly
Relating to malicious prosecution arising from civil actions between private parties
Sponsored by Sen. Adrian Dickey (R)
Topics:Courts & civil law
Where it is now
- Done: IntroducedJanuary 29, 2026
- Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 4, 2026
- Done: Senate committeeFebruary 19, 2026
- Done: Passes the SenateFebruary 24, 202629–17
- Stopped: House committeeDied when the General Assembly ended
- Next: Passes the House
- Next: To the Governor
- Next: Signed into law
Died when the session ended The 2026 session adjourned on May 3, 2026, the General Assembly’s last regular session. Bills that didn’t pass both chambers died. What’s a funnel?
What’s in it
AI summary People can sue a private individual for malicious prosecution if that person started a lawsuit against them without a good reason. To win, the person suing must prove the other party acted with malice and lacked a factual or legal basis for the case. This new rule allows people to seek damages for the harm caused by these unfair lawsuits without needing to prove special injuries like an arrest or loss of property.1
Read the official explanation
This bill relates to malicious prosecution arising from civil actions between private parties. The bill defines “malice” as the initiation of a civil action for a primary purpose other than securing a proper adjudication of the claim, and “probable cause” as the existence of reasonably known facts and law that would lead a reasonable person to believe, in good faith, that the civil action was legally and factually justified at the time the civil action was initiated. The bill authorizes a person a bring a civil action for malicious prosecution against a private party who initiated or caused to be initiated a civil action against the person. To prevail, the plaintiff must prove that the underlying action was brought by the defendant and decided or dismissed in the plaintiff’s favor, that the defendant lacked probable cause to bring the action, that the defendant acted with malice, and that the plaintiff suffered actual damages as a proximate result of the malicious prosecution. The bill specifies that a plaintiff is not required to plead or prove arrest, seizure of property, restraint on liberty, issuance of an injunction, or any other heightened or special injury beyond the ordinary burdens associated with defending a civil action. The bill applies only to malicious prosecution actions between private parties and does not alter any doctrine governing standing to challenge governmental or public wrongs.
House subcommittee
Named March 3, 2026. On March 4, 2026 it recommended passage.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part