Bills › 91st General Assembly

SF 2072Died when the session ended · January 21, 2026

Relating to state entities, including by modifying provisions related to prohibited diversity, equity, and inclusion offices and officers and to trainings and curricula regarding specific defined concepts provided by school districts

Sponsored by Sen. Sandy Salmon (R)

Topics:K–12 educationState governmentDiversity, equity & inclusion

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedJanuary 21, 2026
  2. Done: SubcommitteeJanuary 27, 2026
  3. Stopped: Senate committeeDied when the General Assembly ended
  4. Next: Passes the Senate
  5. Next: House committeeFunnel: by March 20, 2026
  6. Next: Passes the House
  7. Next: To the Governor
  8. Next: Signed into law

Died when the session ended The 2026 session adjourned on May 3, 2026, the General Assembly’s last regular session. Bills that didn’t pass both chambers died. What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

AI summary State agencies and school districts are prohibited from having diversity, equity, and inclusion offices or staff. If a court finds that an agency or school district broke these rules, the person responsible and their supervisor must be fired. The person's professional license would also be taken away, and the organization would have to pay fines based on its budget.1

Read the official explanation

This bill relates to state entities, including by modifying provisions related to prohibited diversity, equity, and inclusion offices and officers and to trainings and curricula regarding specific defined concepts by school districts.2 prohibits state entities from expending any moneys appropriated by the general assembly, or any other moneys, to establish, sustain, support, or staff a diversity, equity, and inclusion office, or to contract, employ, engage, or hire an individual to serve as a diversity, equity, and inclusion officer. 3 authorizes the attorney general to bring an action against a state entity for a writ of mandamus to compel the state entity to comply with these prohibitions.3 authorizes a student or alumnus of a public school, or an employee of a state entity, alleging a violation of the bill’s provisions to bring a civil action for injunctive relief against the state entity to prohibit the state entity from continuing such violation.3 is the prevailing party, the state entity is required to terminate the employment of the person who committed the violation. The bill also provides that if the supervisor of the person who committed the violation was aware of the violation and failed to take actions intended to prevent the violation, then the state entity is required to terminate the employment of the supervisor as well. Additionally, if the position of the person whose employment was terminated required a license, certificate, authorization, or statement of recognition, the person’s license, certificate, authorization, or statement of recognition shall be revoked by the entity that originally issued the license, certificate, authorization, or statement of recognition.3 is the prevailing party, the bill establishes levels of civil penalties to be imposed upon the state entity that are based on the amount of the state entity’s total budget.74(2) requires the superintendent of each school district to ensure that any curriculum or mandatory staff or student training provided by an employee of the school district or by a contractor hired by the school district does not teach, advocate, encourage, promote, or act upon specific stereotyping and scapegoating toward others on the basis of demographic group membership or identity.74(3) requires school district diversity and inclusion efforts to discourage students from discriminating against another by political ideology or any characteristic protected under federal law or applicable state law.74(3) also requires school districts to prohibit employees from discriminating against students or other employees by political ideology or any characteristic protected under federal law or applicable state law.74. The bill also authorizes a student or alumnus of a school district, or an employee of a school district, alleging a violation of the bill’s provisions to bring a civil action for injunctive relief against the school district to prohibit the school district from continuing such violation. The bill establishes the venue in which such actions may be brought. If the attorney general or other person is the prevailing party, the school district is required to terminate the employment of the person who committed the violation. The bill also provides that if the supervisor of the person who committed the violation was aware of the violation and failed to take actions intended to prevent the violation, then the school district is required to terminate the employment of the supervisor as well. Additionally, if the position of the person whose employment was terminated required a license, certificate, authorization, or statement of recognition, the person’s license, certificate, authorization, or statement of recognition shall be revoked by the entity that originally issued the license, certificate, authorization, or statement of recognition, which includes the board of educational examiners. If the attorney general or other person bringing an action is the prevailing party, the bill establishes levels of civil penalties to be imposed upon the school district that are based on the amount of the school district’s total budget. The bill makes conforming changes.

Why it matters. State entities and school districts would face new requirements regarding diversity, equity, and inclusion offices, staff, and training. If a person or supervisor is found to have violated these rules through a successful legal action, the entity must terminate their employment and may face civil penalties based on its total budget. Additionally, any professional licenses or certificates held by the terminated employee would be revoked.2

Full bill text3

Senate subcommittee

Named January 27, 2026. It hasn’t reported yet.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Iowa Code it changes

Creates§272C.10A§279.74A§602.1012§602.3203A

Amends§19.3§256.146§279.74

How the Code works4

Lobbying

6 for · 13 against · 1 undecided · Who →

Similar bills

  • HF 2123 Relating to state entities, including by modifying provisions related to prohibited divers…
    91st General Assembly · Subcommittee recommends passage
    Nearly identical

Matched by wording or an identical title.