Related to competitive information of city utilities

_____ the explanation’s substance by the members of the general assembly. Under current law, the governing body of a city utility or combined utility system, or a city enterprise or combined city enterprise, may vote to hold a closed session to discuss marketing and pricing strategies or proprietary information if its competitive position would be harmed by public disclosure not required of potential or actual competitors, and if no public purpose would be served by such disclosure. The minutes and an audio or audiovisual recording of the session shall be made available for public examination once the public disclosure would no longer harm the utility’s competitive position. This bill allows for a closed session by vote to discuss proprietary information or marketing and pricing strategies if the competitive position of the utility or a third party would be harmed by the public disclosure of the marketing and pricing strategies and such disclosure is not required of potential or actual competitors or other utilities.9, subsection 2, as customer records that if disclosed would harm the competitive position of a customer, or information required by a noncustomer contracting party to be kept confidential pursuant to a nondisclosure agreement which relates to electric transmission planning and construction, critical energy infrastructure, an ownership interest or acquisition of an ownership interest in an electric generating facility, or other information made confidential by law or rule. _____ facility, including but not limited to information required to be kept confidential pursuant to a nondisclosure agreement, or other information made confidential by law or rule.9.