Bills › 91st General Assembly
Relating to parties responsible for the confidentiality of information of participants in the address confidentiality program
Proposed by the Secretary of State · all agency proposals
Topics:State governmentTechnology & privacy
Same legislation: SSB 3029
Where it is now
- Done: IntroducedJanuary 20, 2026
- Done: SubcommitteeJanuary 20, 2026
- Stopped: House committeeDied when the General Assembly ended
- Next: Passes the House
- Next: Senate committeeFunnel: by March 20, 2026
- Next: Passes the Senate
- Next: To the Governor
- Next: Signed into law
Died when the session ended The 2026 session adjourned on May 3, 2026, the General Assembly’s last regular session. Bills that didn’t pass both chambers died. What’s a funnel?
What’s in it
AI summary People in the address confidentiality program can now ask county recorders to hide their names from public websites. This change requires recorders to set up a way to handle these requests and keep that information private. Currently, only assessors are required to do this.1
Read the official explanation
Under current law, an assessor or the assessor’s staff must redact the name of a participant in the address confidentiality program from documents displayed for public access on an internet site, upon the participant’s request. This bill extends this requirement to recorders and requires recorders to implement and maintain a process to facilitate such requests. The bill also strikes the reference to the assessor’s staff for purposes of the requirement.
House subcommittee
Named January 20, 2026. Meeting: Tuesday, February 3 · 12:30 PM · RM 304 (Cancelled).
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Family tree
91st General Assembly