91st General Assembly
Relating to the maximum amount of unemployment benefits payable during a benefit year
Sponsored by Rep. Jerome Amos Jr. (D), Rep. Sean Bagniewski (D), Rep. Timi M. Brown-Powers (D), Rep. Jeff Cooling (D), Rep. Ken Croken (D), Rep. Tracy A. Ehlert (D), Rep. Ruth Ann Gaines (D), Rep. Eric J. Gjerde (D), Rep. Daniel Gosa (D), Rep. David Jacoby (D), Rep. Lindsay James (D), Rep. Rob Johnson (D), Rep. Bob Kressig (D), Rep. Monica Kurth (D), Rep. Elinor A. Levin (D), Rep. Mary Lee Madison (D), Rep. Heather Matson (D), Rep. Brian Meyer (D), Rep. Rick L. Olson (D), Rep. Angel Ramirez (D), Rep. Dr. Megan L. Srinivas (D), Rep. Beth Wessel-Kroeschell (D), Rep. Aime Wichtendahl (D), Rep. Ross Wilburn (D), Rep. Elizabeth Wilson (D), Rep. Adam Zabner (D)
Topics:Jobs & workers
The story so far
AI summary On February 10, 2026, HF 2384 was introduced and referred to the Labor and Workforce committee. On March 31, 2026, the House voted 92 to 0 to place the bill on the calendar. On that same day, the bill was rereferred to the Labor and Workforce committee. The bill is currently in committee.1
What it was written from
- Current status: In committee (2026-02-10)
- 2026-02-10: Introduced, referred to Labor and Workforce.
- 2026-03-31: Motion to invoke Rule 60 to place on Calendar, yeas 92, nays 0.
- 2026-03-31: Motion prevailed.
- 2026-03-31: Placed on calendar.
- 2026-03-31: Rereferred to Labor and Workforce.
Written November 14, 2026.
Where it is now
- Done: IntroducedFebruary 10, 2026
- Skipped: SubcommitteeSkipped
- Done: House committeeMarch 31, 2026
- Stopped: Passes the HouseDied when the General Assembly ended
- Next: Senate committeeFunnel: by March 20, 2026
- Next: Passes the Senate
- Next: To the Governor
- Next: Signed into law
Died when the session ended The 2026 session adjourned on May 3, 2026, the General Assembly’s last regular session. Bills that didn’t pass both chambers died. What’s a funnel?
What’s in it
AI summary People who qualify for unemployment benefits could receive more money than they do now. Instead of getting 16 weeks of payments, eligible workers would be able to receive up to 26 weeks. If a person loses their job because their workplace closes down entirely, they could receive up to 39 weeks of benefits.2
Read the official explanation
This bill provides that the maximum total amount of unemployment benefits payable to an eligible individual during a benefit year shall not exceed 26 times the individual’s weekly benefit amount, rather than 16 times the weekly benefit amount as provided under current law. The bill also provides that the maximum total amount of unemployment benefits payable during a benefit year to an eligible individual laid off due to the individual’s employer going out of business at the factory, establishment, or other premises at which the individual was last employed shall not exceed 39 times the individual’s weekly benefit amount, rather than 26 times the weekly benefit amount as provided under current law.
Similar bills
- HF 2267 Relating to the maximum amount of unemployment benefits payable during a benefit year91st General Assembly · In committeeNearly identical
- SF 358 Relating to the maximum amount of unemployment benefits payable during a benefit year to a…91st General Assembly · In committeeVery similar
- HF 455 Relating to the maximum amount of unemployment benefits payable during a benefit year91st General Assembly · In committeeSimilar
Matched by wording or an identical title.