Bills › 91st General Assembly

HF 2360Signed by Governor · May 6, 2026

Relating to child endangerment

Sponsored by the House Judiciary Committee, Rep. Carter F. Nordman (R)

Topics:Crime & corrections

Same legislation: HF 2086

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedJanuary 15, 2026
  2. Done: SubcommitteeJanuary 22, 2026
  3. Done: House committeeFebruary 5, 2026
  4. Done: Passes the HouseMarch 4, 202697–0
  5. Done: Senate committeeMarch 18, 2026
  6. Done: Passes the SenateApril 6, 202647–0
  7. Done: To the GovernorMay 6, 2026
  8. Done: Signed into lawMay 6, 2026

Signed into law What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

AI summary Under current law, child endangerment rules apply to parents, guardians, or people living in the same home as a child or a minor with a disability. This bill changes the definition of a child to mean anyone under the age of 18. It also removes the word "minor" from these specific parts of the law.1

Read the official explanation

This bill relates to child endangerment. Current law provides that a person who is the parent, guardian, or person having custody or control over a child or a minor under the age of with a mental or physical disability, or a person who is a member of the household in which a child or such a minor resides, commits child endangerment when the person does any of the actions described in Code section 726.6. The bill adds a definition of “child” to mean any person under years of age, and removes references to minors.

Full bill text · What changed before it passed2

Senate subcommittee

Named March 10, 2026. On March 11, 2026 it recommended passage.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Fiscal note

Can’t be estimated Compare with other bills

AI summary This bill changes the definition of a child in child endangerment cases so that anyone under 18 is covered regardless of mental or physical abilities. The fiscal impact of the bill cannot be determined because the number of additional convictions cannot be estimated. This would affect the state's General Fund through operating costs for the Judicial Branch, the Indigent Defense Fund, and the Department of Corrections.3

From the note: The fiscal impact of the Bill cannot be determined because the number of additional convictions cannot be estimated. Figure 2 shows the average State cost per relevant offense. The estimated impact to the General Fund includes operating costs incurred by the Judicial Branch, the Indigent Defense Fund, and the DOC. The costs would be incurred across multiple fiscal years for prison and parole supervision.

Reading a fiscal note4

Iowa Code it changes

Amends§726.6

How the Code works5

Lobbying

4 for · 0 against · 6 undecided · Who →

Family tree