Proyectos de ley › 91.ª Asamblea General
Relating to the choice of doctor to treat injured employees under workers’ compensation laws and including effective date and applicability provisions
Presentado por Sen. Tony Bisignano (D), Sen. Matt Blake (D), Sen. Molly Donahue (D), Sen. William A. Dotzler Jr. (D), Sen. Sarah Trone Garriott (D), Sen. Thomas Townsend (D), Sen. Zach Wahls (D), Sen. Cindy Winckler (D), Sen. Mike Zimmer (D)
Dónde está ahora
- Hecho: Presentado26 de febrero de 2025
- Hecho: Subcomité27 de febrero de 2025
- Se detuvo: Comité del SenadoMurió al terminar la Asamblea General
- Sigue: Lo aprueba el Senado
- Sigue: Comité de la CámaraEmbudo: antes del 20 de marzo de 2026
- Sigue: Lo aprueba la Cámara
- Sigue: A gobernador(a)
- Sigue: Firmado como ley
Murió al terminar la sesión La sesión de 2026 terminó el 3 de mayo de 2026, la última sesión ordinaria de la Asamblea General. Los proyectos que no pasaron por ambas cámaras murieron. ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?
Qué contiene
Resumen con IA Under this law, employers usually get to choose which doctor treats an injured worker, unless that worker has already picked a specific primary care doctor to use. Employers must tell their workers about this right to pick a doctor when they are hired and whenever an injury happens. If an employer fails to give this notice, the injured worker can choose any doctor they want for their treatment. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1
Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)
This bill relates to the choice of a physician to treat an injured employee under the state’s workers’ compensation laws. The bill allows the employer to choose care unless the employee has predesignated a physician as provided in the bill. The bill gives an employee the right to predesignate a physician who is a primary care provider, who has previously provided treatment to the employee and has retained the employee’s medical records, to provide treatment for a work-related injury. The employer is required to provide written notice to employees of this right upon hire, and periodically during employment, and upon receiving notice of an injury from an employee who has not yet predesignated a physician of the employee’s right to do so, in a manner prescribed by the workers’ compensation commissioner. An employer or an employer’s insurer shall not coerce or otherwise attempt to influence an injured employee’s choice of a physician. If the employer fails to provide such notification, an injured employee has the right to choose any physician to provide treatment for the work-related injury and that treatment shall be considered authorized care. If the employer or employee is dissatisfied with the care chosen by the other party, the dissatisfied party should communicate the basis of dissatisfaction to the other party, in writing if requested, and the parties may agree to alternate care reasonably suited to treat the injury. If the parties cannot agree to such alternate care, the dissatisfied party may make an application for alternate care to the commissioner. The bill provides procedures for proceedings on such applications. The bill provides that if the employee has chosen care, when it is medically indicated that no significant improvement from an injury is anticipated, the employee may obtain a medical opinion regarding the extent of the employee’s permanent disability. If the employer believes that the evaluation of permanent disability obtained by the employee is too high, the employer has the right to obtain another medical opinion from a physician of the employer’s choosing. The bill takes effect and applies to injuries occurring on or after January 1, 2026.
Senate subcommittee
Named February 27, 2025. It hasn’t reported yet.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)
Cabildeo
5 a favor · 0 en contra · 0 indecisos · Quiénes →
Family tree
Tried before
91st General Assembly
Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.
Tried before
This idea has been filed in 3 earlier General Assemblies. None got through a chamber.
- SF 365 Relating to the choice of doctor to treat injured employees under workers’ compensation la…90th General Assembly · In committee · very similarCleared committee
- HF 123 Relating to the choice of doctor to treat an injured employee under workers’ compensation …89th General Assembly · In committee · very similarCleared committee
- HF 86 Relating to the choice of doctor to treat an injured employee under workers’ compensation …88th General Assembly · In committee · very similarCleared committee
Matched by wording or an identical title.