Bills › 91st General Assembly
Concerning eligibility for unemployment benefits
Sponsored by Sen. Molly Donahue (D), Sen. William A. Dotzler Jr. (D), Sen. Sarah Trone Garriott (D), Sen. Janet Petersen (D), Sen. Herman C. Quirmbach (D), Sen. Art Staed (D), Sen. Thomas Townsend (D), Sen. Zach Wahls (D), Sen. Janice Weiner (D)
Topics:Jobs & workers
Where it is now
- Done: IntroducedFebruary 19, 2025
- Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 24, 2025
- Stopped: Senate committeeDied when the General Assembly ended
- Next: Passes the Senate
- Next: House committeeFunnel: by March 20, 2026
- Next: Passes the House
- Next: To the Governor
- Next: Signed into law
Died when the session ended The 2026 session adjourned on May 3, 2026, the General Assembly’s last regular session. Bills that didn’t pass both chambers died. What’s a funnel?
What’s in it
AI summary People receiving unemployment benefits would no longer be denied benefits for refusing new work if they expect to return to their old job soon. This change applies to workers facing short-term seasonal or temporary layoffs, as well as those whose employers temporarily stop operating or close due to unexpected reasons. The new rules expand these protections beyond just highway construction workers affected by weather.1
Read the official explanation
This bill relates to unemployment benefits. Under current law, the department of workforce development may establish by rule a process to waive or alter the work search requirements for a claim for benefits if an individual has a reasonable expectation that the individual will be returning to employment and is attached to a regular job or industry or a member in good standing of a union therein eligible for referral for employment. To be considered attached to a regular job or industry, an individual must be on a “short-term temporary layoff”, which is defined as a layoff period of 16 weeks or less due to seasonal weather conditions that impact the ability to perform work related to highway construction, repair, or maintenance with a specific return-to-work date verified by the employer. The bill changes the defined term to “short-term seasonal or temporary layoff”, provides that conditions other than weather conditions are included in the definition, and strikes the language that the work to be performed must be related to highway construction, repair, or maintenance and must have a specific return-to-work date verified by the employer. The bill provides that benefits shall not be denied to an eligible individual for refusing to accept work if the individual has a reasonable expectation that the individual will be returning to employment, as defined by the department by rule, and is attached to a regular job or industry or is a member in good standing of a union therein eligible for referral for employment. To be considered attached to a regular job or industry, an individual must be on a short-term seasonal or temporary layoff. The bill provides that benefits shall not be denied to an eligible individual for refusing to accept work if the individual is unemployed due to the individual’s employer temporarily ceasing operations or going out of business at the factory, establishment, or other premises at which the individual was last employed; the reason for the employer going out of business was a result of unforeseen circumstances; and the individual has a reasonable expectation that the individual will be returning to employment with the employer that temporarily ceased operations or went out of business.
Why it matters. Unemployed individuals could have their work search requirements waived or be allowed to refuse work without losing benefits if they are on a short-term seasonal or temporary layoff and expect to return to their jobs. This change would also apply to people whose employers temporarily stop operations or go out of business due to unforeseen circumstances. The department of workforce development would establish the specific rules for these situations.2
Senate subcommittee
Named February 24, 2025. It hasn’t reported yet.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Iowa Code it changes
Lobbying
4 for · 0 against · 14 undecided · Who →
Family tree
91st General Assembly
Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.
Tried before
This idea has been filed in an earlier General Assembly. None got through a chamber.
- SF 2120 Concerning eligibility for unemployment benefits90th General Assembly · In committee · same titleCleared committee
- HF 2173 Concerning eligibility for unemployment benefits90th General Assembly · In committee · very similarCleared committee
Matched by wording or an identical title.