Bills › 91st General Assembly
Relating to automated decision systems used by employers
Sponsored by Sen. Liz Bennett (D)
Where it is now
- Done: IntroducedFebruary 19, 2026
- Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 23, 2026
- Stopped: Senate committeeDied when the General Assembly ended
- Next: Passes the Senate
- Next: House committeeFunnel: by March 20, 2026
- Next: Passes the House
- Next: To the Governor
- Next: Signed into law
Died when the session ended The 2026 session adjourned on May 3, 2026, the General Assembly’s last regular session. Bills that didn’t pass both chambers died. What’s a funnel?
What’s in it
AI summary Employers would have to tell job applicants and current workers if they use automated computer systems to make decisions about employment. If a computer system is used to decide on discipline or firing someone, a human must review the information before the decision is made. Workers also gain the right to request a copy of the data used to make those decisions and are protected from being punished for using these new rights.1
Read the official explanation
This bill relates to automated decision systems used by employers. The bill requires an employer to provide a written notice that an automated decision system, as defined in the bill, is in use for the purpose of making employment-related decisions, other than hiring decisions, at the workplace to an employee who will foreseeably be directly affected by the automated decision system. The bill specifies the time period, content, and format of such notices. If an employer will use an automated decision system in making hiring decisions for a position, the bill requires the employer to notify an applicant for the position, upon receiving the application, that the employer utilizes an automated decision system when making hiring decisions. The bill specifies various prohibited uses of automated decision systems by employers relating to employee rights. When an employer relies primarily on output from an automated decision system to make a discipline, termination, or deactivation decision, the bill requires the employer to use a human reviewer to review the automated decision system output and compile and review other specified information that is relevant to the decision, if any. The bill prohibits an employer from using customer ratings as the only or primary input data for an automated decision system to make employment-related decisions. The bill requires an employer that primarily relied on an automated decision system to make a discipline, termination, or deactivation decision to provide the affected employee with a written notice at the time the employer informs the employee of the decision. The bill specifies the content and format of the notice. The bill provides that an employee shall have the right to request a copy of the most recent 12 months of the employee’s own data primarily used by an automated decision system to make a discipline, termination, or deactivation decision. An employer shall provide a copy upon request. An employee is limited to one such request every 12 months. For purposes of safeguarding the privacy rights of consumers, employees, and individuals, when an employer is required to provide employee data pursuant to the bill, the employer is required to provide the data in a manner that anonymizes the personal information of any customer, employee, or other individual. The bill prohibits an employer from discharging, threatening to discharge, demoting, suspending, or in any manner discriminating or retaliating against any employee for using or attempting to exercise the employee’s rights under the bill, filing a complaint alleging a violation of the bill, cooperating in an investigation or prosecution of an alleged violation, or taking any action to invoke or assist in any manner the enforcement of the bill. The bill is enforced by the department of inspections, appeals, and licensing (department). Such enforcement may include but is not limited to investigating alleged violations, ordering appropriate temporary relief to mitigate a violation, issuing a citation against an employer who violates the bill, conducting contested case hearings if requested, and bringing a civil action for enforcement. An employer who violates the bill shall be subject to a civil penalty of $500, collectible by the department. A person subject to a violation of the bill may bring an action in district court for appropriate temporary or preliminary injunctive relief, including punitive damages, and reasonable attorney fees and court costs. The department may bring such an action on the person’s behalf with the person’s consent. The bill shall not be construed to prohibit any employer from complying with regulatory or contractual requirements in the provision of products or services to the federal government.
Why it matters. Employers would be required to notify job applicants and current employees when automated decision systems are used for hiring or other workplace decisions. If an employer uses these systems for discipline, termination, or deactivation, they must use a human reviewer and provide written notice and specific data to the affected employee upon request. The department of inspections, appeals, and licensing would enforce these rules, and employers who violate the law could face a $500 civil penalty.2
Senate subcommittee
Named February 23, 2026. It hasn’t reported yet.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part