Bills › 91st General Assembly
Relating to the authority of counties and cities to regulate the installation or use of battery-charged security alarm systems on nonresidential properties
Sponsored by the Senate Local Government (companion To Lsb 5630hv By Committee on Local Government) Committee
Where it is now
- Done: IntroducedFebruary 4, 2026
- Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 4, 2026
- Done: Senate committeeFebruary 12, 2026
- Done: Passes the SenateMarch 4, 202645–0
- Skipped: House committeeSkipped
- Done: Passes the HouseMarch 5, 202685–1
- Done: To the GovernorApril 9, 2026
- Done: Signed into lawApril 9, 2026
Signed into law What’s a funnel?
What’s in it
AI summary Cities and counties would no longer be allowed to use fence or building rules to restrict certain battery-powered outdoor security alarms on business properties. As long as the alarm meets specific safety and height requirements, local governments cannot prohibit its use or require a special fence permit. These new rules do not apply to property used only for homes.1
Read the official explanation
3 provide limitations on the powers of counties and cities, respectively. This bill amends those Code sections to limit a county’s or city’s authority to regulate the use and installation of battery-charged security alarm systems under certain circumstances. The bill defines “battery-charged security alarm system” as an outdoor alarm system that interfaces with an alarm system in a manner that enables the outdoor alarm system to cause the connected alarm system to transmit a signal intended to alert the business and a monitoring station operator in response to a burglary or attempted burglary, is energized by a commercial storage battery not exceeding 12 volts direct current and designed to periodically deliver voltage impulses to the outdoor alarm system, and includes a battery-charging device used exclusively to charge the battery. The bill provides that a county or city shall not consider a battery-charged security alarm system to be a fence or to be subject to regulation by fence codes, and shall not require a fence permit for the installation or use of a battery-charged security alarm system on property that is not used exclusively for residential purposes. The bill further provides that a county or city shall not adopt, enforce, or apply any ordinance, building code, zoning regulation, or other requirement that prohibits or otherwise regulates the installation or use of a battery-charged security alarm system on nonresidential property, provided that the system complies with all of the following requirements: (1) the energizer is certified to meet the current international electrotechnical commission standard 60335-2-76, or a successor standard; (2) the battery-charged security alarm system is located behind a nonelectric perimeter fence or wall that is not less than 5 feet in height; (3) the battery-charged security alarm system is the greater of 10 feet in height or 2 feet higher than the surrounding nonelectric perimeter fence or wall; and (4) warning signs, in capitalized type, reading “WARNING —— ELECTRIC FENCE” or substantially similar language are posted at intervals not greater than 30 feet along the fence. The bill does not apply to property used exclusively for residential purposes. The bill specifies that a county or city may only require an alarm system operator license or permit for battery-charged security alarm systems in the same manner as is required for any other security alarm systems. The bill specifies that nothing in the bill shall be construed to apply to security alarm systems that do not meet the definition of “battery-charged security alarm system”.
Why it matters. Counties and cities would be prohibited from using fence codes, zoning regulations, or building codes to regulate or prohibit the installation of certain battery-charged security alarm systems on nonresidential property. Business owners using these specific systems would not need a fence permit for the installation, provided the system meets certain height, placement, and warning sign requirements.2
Senate subcommittee
Named February 4, 2026 (as SSB 3112). On February 11, 2026 it recommended passage.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
1 written public comment to its subcommittee: February 10, 2026 (1) · on the Legislature’s site
Iowa Code it changes
Lobbying
3 for · 1 against · 13 undecided · Who →
Family tree
Study bill
91st General Assembly