Proyectos de ley › 91.ª Asamblea General

SF 2149Murió al terminar la sesión · 29 de enero de 2026

Relating to civil actions against school board members and superintendents for school policies that violate state law

Presentado por Sen. Doug Campbell (R)

Temas:Courts & civil lawK–12 education

Dónde está ahora

  1. Hecho: Presentado29 de enero de 2026
  2. Hecho: Subcomité3 de febrero de 2026
  3. Se detuvo: Comité del SenadoMurió al terminar la Asamblea General
  4. Sigue: Lo aprueba el Senado
  5. Sigue: Comité de la CámaraEmbudo: antes del 20 de marzo de 2026
  6. Sigue: Lo aprueba la Cámara
  7. Sigue: A gobernador(a)
  8. Sigue: Firmado como ley

Murió al terminar la sesión La sesión de 2026 terminó el 3 de mayo de 2026, la última sesión ordinaria de la Asamblea General. Los proyectos que no pasaron por ambas cámaras murieron. ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?

Qué contiene

Resumen con IA If a person living in a school district thinks a school board or superintendent is breaking state law with a new policy, they can tell the county attorney. The county attorney can then take the school district to court to make them follow the law. If the county attorney wins, the court will order the school to comply and award money to the county attorney's office to cover costs or penalties. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1

Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)

This bill relates to civil actions against school board members and superintendents for school policies that violate state law. The bill provides that if any person residing in a school district believes that the board of directors of the school district or the superintendent of the school district has adopted a policy that is in violation of any state law, the person may notify the county attorney of the potential violation. The county attorney may bring a civil action against the members of the board of directors of the school district who voted in favor of adopting the policy that may be in violation of a state law, and against the superintendent of the school district, to compel the school district to comply with state law. The bill establishes that if the county attorney is the prevailing party in the civil action, the court shall grant the injunctive relief sought by the county attorney and award the county attorney an amount equal to the greater of $1,000 for each defendant that the court finds adopted a policy that is in violation of state law or the costs the county attorney incurred in bringing the civil action. Any moneys awarded must be deposited in the general fund of the county for the use of the county attorney in carrying out the county attorney’s duties.

Texto completo del proyecto (en inglés)2

Senate subcommittee

Named February 3, 2026. It hasn’t reported yet.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)

Crea§279.89

Cómo funciona el Código3

Cabildeo

1 a favor · 6 en contra · 0 indecisos · Quiénes →

Similar bills

  • SF 178 Relating to civil actions against school board members and superintendents for school poli…
    91st General Assembly · Subcommittee recommends passage
    Nearly identical

Matched by wording or an identical title.