Proyectos de ley › 91.ª Asamblea General
Relating to state entities, including by modifying provisions related to prohibited diversity, equity, and inclusion offices and officers and to trainings and curricula regarding specific defined concepts provided by school districts
Presentado por Sen. Sandy Salmon (R)
Temas:K–12 educationState governmentDiversity, equity & inclusion
Dónde está ahora
- Hecho: Presentado21 de enero de 2026
- Hecho: Subcomité27 de enero de 2026
- Se detuvo: Comité del SenadoMurió al terminar la Asamblea General
- Sigue: Lo aprueba el Senado
- Sigue: Comité de la CámaraEmbudo: antes del 20 de marzo de 2026
- Sigue: Lo aprueba la Cámara
- Sigue: A gobernador(a)
- Sigue: Firmado como ley
Murió al terminar la sesión La sesión de 2026 terminó el 3 de mayo de 2026, la última sesión ordinaria de la Asamblea General. Los proyectos que no pasaron por ambas cámaras murieron. ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?
Qué contiene
Resumen con IA Las agencias estatales y los distritos escolares tienen prohibido tener oficinas o personal de diversidad, equidad e inclusión. Si un tribunal determina que una agencia o un distrito escolar rompió estas reglas, la persona responsable y su supervisor deben ser despedidos. También se le quitaría la licencia profesional a la persona, y la organización tendría que pagar multas basadas en su presupuesto.1
Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)
This bill relates to state entities, including by modifying provisions related to prohibited diversity, equity, and inclusion offices and officers and to trainings and curricula regarding specific defined concepts by school districts.2 prohibits state entities from expending any moneys appropriated by the general assembly, or any other moneys, to establish, sustain, support, or staff a diversity, equity, and inclusion office, or to contract, employ, engage, or hire an individual to serve as a diversity, equity, and inclusion officer. 3 authorizes the attorney general to bring an action against a state entity for a writ of mandamus to compel the state entity to comply with these prohibitions.3 authorizes a student or alumnus of a public school, or an employee of a state entity, alleging a violation of the bill’s provisions to bring a civil action for injunctive relief against the state entity to prohibit the state entity from continuing such violation.3 is the prevailing party, the state entity is required to terminate the employment of the person who committed the violation. The bill also provides that if the supervisor of the person who committed the violation was aware of the violation and failed to take actions intended to prevent the violation, then the state entity is required to terminate the employment of the supervisor as well. Additionally, if the position of the person whose employment was terminated required a license, certificate, authorization, or statement of recognition, the person’s license, certificate, authorization, or statement of recognition shall be revoked by the entity that originally issued the license, certificate, authorization, or statement of recognition.3 is the prevailing party, the bill establishes levels of civil penalties to be imposed upon the state entity that are based on the amount of the state entity’s total budget.74(2) requires the superintendent of each school district to ensure that any curriculum or mandatory staff or student training provided by an employee of the school district or by a contractor hired by the school district does not teach, advocate, encourage, promote, or act upon specific stereotyping and scapegoating toward others on the basis of demographic group membership or identity.74(3) requires school district diversity and inclusion efforts to discourage students from discriminating against another by political ideology or any characteristic protected under federal law or applicable state law.74(3) also requires school districts to prohibit employees from discriminating against students or other employees by political ideology or any characteristic protected under federal law or applicable state law.74. The bill also authorizes a student or alumnus of a school district, or an employee of a school district, alleging a violation of the bill’s provisions to bring a civil action for injunctive relief against the school district to prohibit the school district from continuing such violation. The bill establishes the venue in which such actions may be brought. If the attorney general or other person is the prevailing party, the school district is required to terminate the employment of the person who committed the violation. The bill also provides that if the supervisor of the person who committed the violation was aware of the violation and failed to take actions intended to prevent the violation, then the school district is required to terminate the employment of the supervisor as well. Additionally, if the position of the person whose employment was terminated required a license, certificate, authorization, or statement of recognition, the person’s license, certificate, authorization, or statement of recognition shall be revoked by the entity that originally issued the license, certificate, authorization, or statement of recognition, which includes the board of educational examiners. If the attorney general or other person bringing an action is the prevailing party, the bill establishes levels of civil penalties to be imposed upon the school district that are based on the amount of the school district’s total budget. The bill makes conforming changes.
Por qué importa. Las entidades estatales y los distritos escolares enfrentarían nuevos requisitos con respecto a las oficinas, el personal y la capacitación sobre diversidad, equidad e inclusión. Si se determina que una persona o supervisor ha violado estas reglas mediante una acción legal exitosa, la entidad debe terminar su empleo y puede enfrentar sanciones civiles basadas en su presupuesto total. Además, cualquier licencia o certificado profesional que tenga el empleado despedido sería revocado.2
Senate subcommittee
Named January 27, 2026. It hasn’t reported yet.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)
Cabildeo
6 a favor · 13 en contra · 1 indecisos · Quiénes →
Similar bills
- HF 2123 Relating to state entities, including by modifying provisions related to prohibited divers…91st General Assembly · Subcommittee recommends passageNearly identical
Matched by wording or an identical title.