Proyectos de ley › 91.ª Asamblea General
Relating to consumer data protection, and including retroactive applicability provisions
Presentado por Sen. Kevin Alons (R), Sen. Dennis Guth (R), Sen. Mark S. Lofgren (R), Sen. Sandy Salmon (R), Sen. Cherielynn Westrich (R)
Temas:Business & economyHealth careTechnology & privacyData privacy
La misma legislación: HF 503
Dónde está ahora
- Hecho: Presentado28 de enero de 2025
- Hecho: Subcomité28 de enero de 2025
- Se detuvo: Comité del SenadoMurió al terminar la Asamblea General
- Sigue: Lo aprueba el Senado
- Sigue: Comité de la CámaraEmbudo: antes del 20 de marzo de 2026
- Sigue: Lo aprueba la Cámara
- Sigue: A gobernador(a)
- Sigue: Firmado como ley
Murió al terminar la sesión La sesión de 2026 terminó el 3 de mayo de 2026, la última sesión ordinaria de la Asamblea General. Los proyectos que no pasaron por ambas cámaras murieron. ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?
Qué contiene
Resumen con IA New rules would give people more control over their personal information by allowing them to opt out of automated profiling used to make important decisions about them. The law expands what counts as sensitive health data and includes records that contain non-health information related to medical visits. These protections do not apply to certain groups like banks, colleges, or government agencies. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1
Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)
This bill relates to consumer data protection.1, “child” is defined as any natural person younger than years of age. Under the bill, “child” is defined as any natural person younger than years of age. The bill expands the definition of “health record” to include, in addition to any record containing related health information, any record containing nonhealth information that is related to health information provided in confidence to a health care provider. The bill expands the definition of “sensitive data” to include health data. “Health data” is defined in the bill. Under the bill, except as it relates to health data, the Code chapter shall not apply to the state or any political subdivision of the state; financial institutions, affiliates of financial institutions, or data subject to Tit.; persons who are subject to and comply with regulations promulgated pursuant to Tit. II, subtit. F, of the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, Pub. L. 104-191, and Tit. XIII, subtit. §17921 – 17954; nonprofit organizations; or institutions of higher education. The bill exempts information or data maintained by a public health authority, as defined by HIPAA, from the Code chapter provided the public health authority has received the consumer’s authorization, unless otherwise required by HIPAA. The bill exempts information used only for public health activities and purposes as authorized by HIPAA, provided that the information is de-identified, aggregated, and processed in batches of no less than 100 consumers from the Code chapter. Under the bill, a consumer shall have the right to request to be notified of, or to opt out of, profiling in furtherance of a decision that produces legal or similarly significant effects concerning a consumer. The bill defines “profiling” as any form of automated processing performed on personal data to evaluate, analyze, or predict specific factors related to the economic status, health, personal preferences, interests, reliability, behavior, location, or movements of an individual. Notification to the consumer shall be in plain language and include the type of data subject to profiling, any requirements for a person receiving the consumer’s data to delete or return the data, and the process for a consumer to file a complaint. “Decision that produces legal or similarly significant effects concerning a consumer” is defined in the bill. The bill applies retroactively to January 1, 2025.
Senate subcommittee
Named January 28, 2025. On January 30, 2025 it recommended passage.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)
Cabildeo
2 a favor · 17 en contra · 7 indecisos · Quiénes →
Family tree
Tried before
91st General Assembly
Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.
Tried before
This idea has been filed in an earlier General Assembly. None got through a chamber.
- SF 2272 Relating to consumer data protection, and including effective date provisions90th General Assembly · Renumbered as SF 2321 · nearly identicalCleared committee
Matched by wording or an identical title.