Proyectos de ley › 91.ª Asamblea General
Relating to the authority of counties and cities to regulate the installation or use of battery-charged security alarm systems on nonresidential properties
Dónde está ahora
- Hecho: Presentado3 de febrero de 2026
- Hecho: Subcomité3 de febrero de 2026
- Hecho: Comité de la Cámara10 de febrero de 2026
- Se saltó: Lo aprueba la CámaraSigue como HF 2516
- Sigue: Comité del Senado
- Sigue: Lo aprueba el Senado
- Sigue: A gobernador(a)
- Sigue: Firmado como ley
Ahora es HF 2516 → Sigue avanzando con el número nuevo. Ir a HF 2516 ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?
Qué contiene
Resumen con IA Local governments would no longer be allowed to regulate certain battery-powered outdoor security alarms on business properties. As long as the alarm meets specific safety and height requirements, cities and counties cannot treat it like a fence or require a fence permit. This change does not apply to property used only for homes. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1
Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)
3 provide limitations on the powers of counties and cities, respectively. _____ of battery-charged security alarm systems under certain circumstances. The bill defines “battery-charged security alarm system” as an outdoor alarm system that interfaces with an alarm system in a manner that enables the outdoor alarm system to cause the connected alarm system to transmit a signal intended to alert the business and a monitoring station operator in response to a burglary or attempted burglary, is energized by a commercial storage battery not exceeding 12 volts direct current and designed to periodically deliver voltage impulses to the outdoor alarm system, and includes a battery-charging device used exclusively to charge the battery. The bill provides that a county or city shall not consider a battery-charged security alarm system to be a fence or to be subject to regulation by fence codes, and shall not require a fence permit for the installation or use of a battery-charged security alarm system on property that is not used exclusively for residential purposes. The bill further provides that a county or city shall not adopt, enforce, or apply any ordinance, building code, zoning regulation, or other requirement that prohibits or otherwise regulates the installation or use of a battery-charged security alarm system on nonresidential property, provided that the system complies with all of the following requirements: (1) the energizer is certified to meet the current international electrotechnical commission standard 60335-2-76, or a successor standard; (2) the battery-charged security alarm system is located behind a nonelectric perimeter fence or wall that is not less than 5 feet in height; (3) the battery-charged security alarm system is the greater of 10 feet in height or 2 feet higher than the surrounding nonelectric perimeter fence or wall; and (4) warning signs, in capitalized type, reading “WARNING —— ELECTRIC FENCE” or substantially similar language are posted at intervals not greater than 30 feet along the fence. _____ residential purposes. The bill specifies that a county or city may only require an alarm system operator license or permit for battery-charged security alarm systems in the same manner as is required for any other security alarm systems. The bill specifies that nothing in the bill shall be construed to apply to security alarm systems that do not meet the definition of “battery-charged security alarm system”.
Texto completo del proyecto (en inglés) · Qué cambió antes de aprobarse2
House subcommittee
Named February 3, 2026. On February 10, 2026 it recommended passage.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
1 comentario público por escrito a su subcomité: 10 de febrero de 2026 (1) · en el sitio de la Legislatura
Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)
Cabildeo
3 a favor · 1 en contra · 13 indecisos · Quiénes →
Family tree
Study bill
91st General Assembly