Proyectos de ley › 91.ª Asamblea General

HSB 42Murió al terminar la sesión · 29 de enero de 2025

Relating to discovery and postconviction procedure

Temas:Courts & civil lawCrime & corrections

La misma legislación: SSB 1009, SF 393

Dónde está ahora

  1. Hecho: Presentado21 de enero de 2025
  2. Hecho: Subcomité21 de enero de 2025
  3. Se detuvo: Comité de la CámaraMurió al terminar la Asamblea General
  4. Sigue: Lo aprueba la Cámara
  5. Se saltó: Comité del SenadoSe saltó
  6. Hecho: Lo aprueba el Senado10 de marzo de 202533–14
  7. Sigue: A gobernador(a)
  8. Sigue: Firmado como ley

Murió al terminar la sesión La sesión de 2026 terminó el 3 de mayo de 2026, la última sesión ordinaria de la Asamblea General. Los proyectos que no pasaron por ambas cámaras murieron. ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?

Qué contiene

Resumen con IA People seeking relief after a criminal conviction would face new rules when asking for evidence or information. A judge must now approve these requests, and certain protections are added to limit how much a victim's privacy can be invaded. Additionally, anyone contacting a victim or witness must explain who they are and let the person know they do not have to participate. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1

Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)

This bill relates to discovery and postconviction procedure. The bill provides limitations on discovery and procedure applicable to a claim for postconviction relief, notwithstanding any other statute, rule, or law. No discovery may be conducted unless and until permitted by order of the court consistent with the limitations of the bill or by prior agreement of the parties. A discovery request must be accompanied by a statement identifying the information sought and the manner in which the proposed discovery is to be conducted. A court may grant a discovery request only upon a showing that the information sought and the manner in which it is sought does not unreasonably invade the privacy interests of an affected person; the information sought is necessary to support or defeat a claim; and all affected persons have received notice of the discovery request and have had a reasonable opportunity to object to the proposed discovery. The bill provides that either party may obtain discovery from an attorney who previously represented the applicant in the underlying criminal action or on appeal. The parties have standing to object to or move to quash any discovery request, and an affected person has standing to object to or move to quash any discovery request for private information. _____ the information is not available from any other source; and contact with a victim is minimized by limitations on the method of discovery.31A. The bill provides that the state is not required to produce copies of discovery previously disclosed to an applicant except upon a showing of a compelling need. The state is not required to produce any discovery contained in a court file accessible to the applicant, or to produce any discovery that cannot lawfully be disseminated or that is otherwise confidential by law. The bill requires that documents or other evidence obtained by one party through a subpoena must be provided to the other party within three business days. The court may sanction an attorney or party for knowingly conducting discovery in violation of the bill. The bill provides that if a person acting on behalf of an applicant contacts a victim or witness, the person shall clearly inform the victim or witness of the person’s identity and capacity, and inform the victim or witness that the victim or witness does not have to talk to or otherwise provide evidence or discovery unless the victim or witness wishes, and that the victim or witness may have an advocate or attorney present during any interview or other contact. Upon application by a victim or the state, the court will appoint an attorney to represent the victim. The bill does not relieve the state of any constitutional obligation to disclose exculpatory evidence to a postconviction relief applicant.

Texto completo del proyecto (en inglés)2

House subcommittee

Named January 21, 2025. On January 29, 2025 it recommended passage.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

1 comentario público por escrito a su subcomité: 22 de enero de 2025 (1) · en el sitio de la Legislatura

Nota fiscal

Resumen con IA This bill limits how discovery is conducted in postconviction relief cases and sets specific requirements for obtaining information involving victims. The State Public Defender's costs are estimated to increase by approximately $2.0 million per year, including $1,600,000 from the Indigent Defense Fund. The fiscal impact on the Judicial Branch cannot be determined, but is anticipated to be minimal. (en inglés)3

Lea la nota fiscal (en inglés)

Description

Senate File 393 relates to discovery and postconviction procedure and provides limitations applicable to a claim for postconviction relief (PCR), notwithstanding any other statute, rule, or law. The Bill would limit discovery to be conducted only when permitted by order of the court or prior agreement of the parties. The request for discovery must be accompanied by a statement identifying the information sought and the way the proposed discovery is to be conducted. The Bill also provides that discovery involving a victim of a public offense cannot be conducted unless all of the following are established by sufficient evidence:

  • The evidence is necessary to prove the applicant is innocent of the underlying public offense and all lesser included offenses.
  • The information is not available from any other source.
  • Contact with a victim is minimized by limitations on the method of discovery. Under the Bill, the State is not required to produce copies of discovery previously disclosed to an applicant except upon demonstration of compelling need. The State is further not required to produce any discovery contained in a court file accessible to the applicant. The State is not required to produce any discovery that cannot lawfully be circulated or that is otherwise confidential. The Bill allows for the appointment of an attorney for certain victims. The Bill does not relieve the State of any constitutional obligation to disclose exculpatory evidence to a PCR applicant.

Background

Iowa Code section 822.7 provides that all rules and statutes applicable in civil proceedings are available to the parties in postconviction discovery procedures. The scope of discovery is then that of civil procedure, including the ability to file and issue subpoenas. From FY 2022 to FY 2024, the Office of the State Public Defender (SPD) processed an average of 882 PCR claims at an average cost of $1,800 per case, expending a total of $1.6 million from the Indigent Defense Fund. From FY 2022 through FY 2024, the SPD paid an average of 50 investigator claims per year at $670 per claim. The hourly rate of investigators, under 493 IAC 13.2(1), is limited to $75.

The Judicial Branch reports that the average number of PCR filings from calendar year (CY) 2021 through CY 2024 was 620 per year.

Assumptions

  • The SPD will remain as counsel for the same average number of PCR cases per year (882).
  • The SPD estimates the average cost per case as $4,950 due to an increase in the number of motions, hearings, and investigations.
  • The SPD investigations by employees will increase, necessitating the hiring of 3.0 full-time equivalent (FTE) Investigator 2 positions. The estimated annual cost of 1.0 Investigator 2 FTE position is $69,000.
  • Contract attorneys’ use of investigative services will increase by approximately 80.0% or $62,000.
  • The SPD estimates that 25.0% of cases would need representation for a victim.
  • The SPD estimates an additional cost of $84,000 for 5.0 hours of time per claim for attorney representation of victims and witnesses.
  • The SPD estimates that an additional $1.6 million will be spent on PCR claims from the Indigent Defense Fund due to increased time spent on pretrial litigation.
  • Under the most recent judicial officer time study, the average time required in PCR cases is 397.0 minutes (6.6 hours) at the cost of $110 per hour.

Fiscal Impact

The fiscal impact of Senate File 393 to the SPD is estimated to increase costs by approximately $2.0 million per year as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1 — Additional Annual Costs to the SPD Under SF 393

State Public Defender Expenses Estimated

Expenditure

3.0 FTE positions – Investigator 2 $ 206,000 Investigator claims for contract attorneys 62,000 Attorney cost for representation of victims and witnesses 84,000 Pretrial litigation of PCR claims – Indigent Defense Fund 1,600,000 Total $ 1,952,000 The fiscal impact of Senate File 393 to the Judicial Branch cannot be determined, but is anticipated to be minimal.

Sources

  • Office of the State Public Defender
  • Judicial Branch

Cómo leer una nota fiscal4

Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)

Crea§822.7A

Modifica§822.7

Cómo funciona el Código5

Cabildeo

4 a favor · 4 en contra · 6 indecisos · Quiénes →

Family tree