Bills › 91st General Assembly
Relating to administrative investigations under the peace officer, public safety, and emergency personnel bill of rights, civil service disciplinary hearings and appeals, and communications in professional confidence, and including effective date provisions
Topics:Courts & civil lawCrime & correctionsPublic safety & emergencies
Where it is now
- Done: IntroducedFebruary 18, 2025
- Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 18, 2025
- Done: House committeeMarch 6, 2025
- Skipped: Passes the HouseContinued as HF 921
- Next: Senate committee
- Next: Passes the Senate
- Next: To the Governor
- Next: Signed into law
Became HF 921 → Its progress continues under the new number. Go to HF 921 What’s a funnel?
What’s in it
AI summary Law enforcement and emergency workers would get copies of investigation reports and witness statements for free if they ask for them in writing. The law also requires prosecutors to be fair when deciding to put an officer on a special list regarding their credibility. Additionally, people acting as crisis counselors for these workers cannot be forced to share the private information they hear during their support sessions.1
Read the official explanation
This bill relates to administrative investigations under the peace officer, public safety, and emergency personnel bill of rights, civil service disciplinary hearings and appeals, and communications in professional confidence. The bill provides that upon written request, an officer or the officer’s legal counsel will be provided with the written complaint, copies of any witness statements, and the agency’s complete investigative report in a timely manner. The complete administrative investigation report must be provided to the officer and the officer’s legal counsel at the end of the investigation at no charge. An interview of the officer shall be conducted at any facility of the investigating agency at a reasonable time. _____ paragraph “i”, which provides that the subsection does not create a private cause of action against a prosecuting agency or an employee of a prosecuting agency. The bill provides that an officer placed on a Brady-Giglio list by a prosecuting agency, regardless of when such placement occurred, has the rights afforded under the bill. The bill requires a prosecuting agency to fairly and impartially make decisions in good faith regarding placing an officer on a Brady-Giglio list or making a Brady-Giglio disclosure. A county attorney or assistant county attorney may not represent or advise the county, civil service commission, or a sheriff or deputy sheriff in any administrative or civil matter or case involving the same facts or circumstances from which the law enforcement officer was placed on a Brady-Giglio list or a Brady-Giglio disclosure was made or is pending unless the sheriff or deputy sheriff provides informed consent in writing. The sheriff shall have the authority to select and retain outside legal counsel regarding third-party public records requests for information or records relating to the sheriff’s or deputy sheriff’s placement on a Brady-Giglio list or a Brady-Giglio disclosure at the expense of the county. The bill provides that the district court has jurisdiction over actions brought under Code chapter 80F. A decision of the district court may be appealed to the Iowa supreme court. The bill provides that the disciplinary appeal provisions concerning classified civil service for deputy county sheriffs apply to part-time deputy sheriffs. The bill provides that a peer support counselor or individual present for individual or group crisis intervention who obtains information from an officer or a civilian employee of a law enforcement agency, emergency management agency, emergency medical services agency, or fire department shall not be allowed to disclose any confidential communication entrusted to the counselor or individual present including in giving testimony. _____ The bill takes effect upon enactment.
House subcommittee
Named February 18, 2025. On February 25, 2025 it recommended passage.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
5 written public comments to its subcommittee: February 25, 2025 (5) · on the Legislature’s site
Iowa Code it changes
Lobbying
3 for · 6 against · 14 undecided · Who →
Family tree
Study bill
91st General Assembly