Bills › 91st General Assembly
Relating to judicial branch administration, including judicial officer residency, judicial officer retirement age, remote proceedings, court reporter supervision and duties, and civil pleadings availability, and including applicability provisions
Sponsored by the House Judiciary Committee
Proposed by the Judicial Branch · all agency proposals
Where it is now
- Done: IntroducedFebruary 26, 2025
- Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 26, 2025
- Done: House committeeMarch 6, 2025
- Done: Passes the HouseMarch 27, 202587–6
- Done: Senate committeeApril 3, 2025
- Done: Passes the SenateApril 23, 202548–0
- Done: To the GovernorMay 19, 2025
- Done: Signed into lawMay 19, 2025
Signed into law What’s a funnel?
What’s in it
AI summary Judges would be allowed to live in a county next to their assigned district instead of being required to live directly within it. The mandatory retirement age for judicial officers would increase, and court proceedings could be held remotely through technology. Additionally, the bill changes how court reporters are supervised and allows certain legal documents to be accessed more quickly.1
Read the official explanation
This bill relates to judicial branch administration, including judicial officer residency, judicial officer retirement age, remote proceedings, court reporter supervision and duties, and civil pleadings availability. DIVISION I —— JUDICIAL OFFICER RESIDENCY. Under current law, a district judge must be a resident of the judicial election district in which appointed during the entire term of office. The bill expands this to include a county contiguous with the judicial election district of appointment. The bill also applies the new residency requirement to district associate judges, magistrates, full-time associate juvenile judges, and full-time associate probate judges. The bill repeals a Code section relating to judge residency requirements for a 1984-1985 transition for judicial election districts 5A and 5C. DIVISION II —— JUDICIAL OFFICER RETIREMENT AGE. The bill increases the mandatory retirement age of judicial officers from to years of age and makes conforming changes to judicial nominating procedures and senior judge retirement age. This division applies to judicial officers retiring on or after July 1, 2025. DIVISION III —— MISCELLANEOUS JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION. The bill authorizes court proceedings to be held by remote means of communication. The bill amends how court reporters are appointed and supervised. Under current law, a district judge may appoint a court reporter, and a district associate judge may appoint a court reporter subject to approval by the chief judge. A retired justice or judge, or a senior judge, may also appoint a temporary court reporter under current law. Under the bill, the chief judge of the judicial district or the chief judge’s designee has the authority to supervise, schedule, and assign duties of all court reporters in the judicial district. The bill allows a judge presiding over a reported proceeding to have authority to supervise the work of a court reporter while the court reporter is reporting in that matter. The bill provides that the chief judge may delegate the chief judge’s authority to appoint, supervise, and assign duties of court reporters to the district court administrator or the district court administrator’s designee. The bill requires judicial officers of a judicial district to appoint a court reporter, subject to approval of the chief judge of the judicial district or the chief judge’s designee. The bill allows the clerk of court to provide access to a civil pleading before a memorandum of the filing date of the pleading for the appearance docket is made.
Why it matters. Judicial officers would be allowed to live in counties next to their election district, and the mandatory retirement age for these officers would increase. The bill also allows court proceedings to be held remotely, changes how court reporters are supervised and assigned, and permits clerks of court to provide access to civil pleadings sooner.2
Changed since by amendment H-1135; see Amendments.
Senate subcommittee
Named April 1, 2025. On April 2, 2025 it recommended passage.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Iowa Code it changes
Amends§46.14§602.1610§602.1612§602.3201§602.6105§602.6201§602.6305§602.6404§602.6603§602.7103C§602.8102§602.9203§633.20C
Repeals§602.1111
Lobbying
4 for · 0 against · 5 undecided · Who →
Family tree
91st General Assembly