Sign in

Bills › 91st General Assembly

HF 719Died when the session ended · March 3, 2025

Requiring the department of revenue to issue a request for proposals to study local taxing authority processes and procedures

Sponsored by Rep. John H. Wills (R)

Topics:State governmentCities & countiesTaxes

Write your legislators about it
Official bill pageLobbyist declarationsOne-pager to print

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedMarch 3, 2025
  2. Stopped: SubcommitteeDied when the General Assembly ended
  3. Next: House committeeFunnel: by February 20, 2026
  4. Next: Passes the House
  5. Next: Senate committeeFunnel: by March 20, 2026
  6. Next: Passes the Senate
  7. Next: To the Governor
  8. Next: Signed into law

Died when the session ended The 2026 session adjourned on May 3, 2026, the General Assembly’s last regular session. Bills that didn’t pass both chambers died. What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

This bill requires the department of revenue, in consultation with the department of government efficiency task force, to issue a request for proposals to hire a private entity to conduct a study of local taxing authorities in this state in order to achieve the most efficient and cost-effective methods for local taxing authorities to levy and collect taxes and assess property values or other applicable taxing methods. The bill requires the request for proposals to be issued by July 1, 2026, and a contract to be executed with the contractor selected by October 1, 2026.

Read the full explanation

The contract shall provide that percent of the total cost shall be paid by the state and percent shall be paid by the local taxing authorities as determined by the department of revenue. The department of revenue must submit to the general assembly a report detailing findings from the study conducted by the private entity by June 30, 2027. “Local taxing authority” includes a county, city, school district, township, or an entity organized pursuant to Code chapter 28E that has taxing authority.3.2, subsection 3, which would relieve a political subdivision from complying with a state mandate if funding for the cost of the state mandate is not provided or specified. Therefore, political subdivisions are required to comply with any state mandate included in the bill.

From the explanation printed with the bill as introduced, written by the Legislative Services Agency. Amendments adopted later aren’t reflected. Full bill text

Lobbying

1 for · 2 against · 11 undecided · Who →