Proyectos de ley › 91.ª Asamblea General
Relating to beneficial use in the context of water allocation
Presentado por Rep. Eddie Andrews (R), Rep. Cindy Golding (R), Rep. Helena Hayes (R), Rep. Bob Henderson (R), Rep. Mark I. Thompson (R)
Temas:Environment & natural resources
La misma legislación: HF 861
Dónde está ahora
- Hecho: Presentado19 de febrero de 2025
- Hecho: Subcomité24 de febrero de 2025
- Hecho: Comité de la Cámara4 de marzo de 2025
- Se saltó: Lo aprueba la CámaraSigue como HF 861
- Sigue: Comité del Senado
- Sigue: Lo aprueba el Senado
- Sigue: A gobernador(a)
- Sigue: Firmado como ley
Ahora es HF 861 → Sigue avanzando con el número nuevo. Ir a HF 861 ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?
Qué contiene
Resumen con IA Instead of using a set definition for beneficial water use, the Department of Natural Resources would decide on a case-by-case basis if water use is appropriate. This change affects how the state grants permits for people or businesses to move, store, or take water. The department cannot base its decision on what category the water use falls into. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1
Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)
The inclusion of this explanation does not constitute agreement with the explanation’s substance by the members of the general assembly. This bill relates to beneficial use of water allocation. Under current law, for the purposes of subchapter III, part 4, of Code chapter 455B, “beneficial use” is defined as the application of water to a useful purpose that inures to the benefit of the water user and subject to the user’s dominion and control but does not include the waste or pollution of water. The bill strikes the definition and provides that beneficial use is determined by the department of natural resources on a case-by-case basis when determining whether to grant a permit for the diversion, storage, or withdrawal of water, and must not be based on the category of use.
House subcommittee
Named February 24, 2025. On February 27, 2025 it recommended passage.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
1 comentario público por escrito a su subcomité: 27 de febrero de 2025 (1) · en el sitio de la Legislatura
Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)
Cabildeo
3 a favor · 0 en contra · 6 indecisos · Quiénes →
Family tree
91st General Assembly
Similar bills
- HF 2210 Relating to beneficial use in the context of water allocation91st General Assembly · In committeeNearly identical
Matched by wording or an identical title.