Bills › 91st General Assembly
Relating to state and local government taxes, budgets, and authority, by modifying provisions relating to the assessment and taxation of property, funding from the secure an advanced vision for education fund, urban renewal areas, establishing a program for certain first-time homebuyers, establishing a local government efficiency grant fund, making appropriations, and including effective date, applicability, and retroactive applicability provisions
Sponsored by the House Ways and Means Committee
Topics:State budgetCities & countiesTaxes
Same legislation: HSB 596
Where it is now
- Done: IntroducedJanuary 21, 2026
- Done: SubcommitteeJanuary 21, 2026
- Done: House committeeMarch 18, 2026
- Stopped: Passes the HouseDied when the General Assembly ended
- Next: Senate committeeFunnel: by March 20, 2026
- Next: Passes the Senate
- Next: To the Governor
- Next: Signed into law
Died when the session ended The 2026 session adjourned on May 3, 2026, the General Assembly’s last regular session. Bills that didn’t pass both chambers died. What’s a funnel?
What’s in it
AI summary This bill changes how local governments manage their budgets and property taxes. It limits how much money local governments can keep in reserve and sets a maximum amount they can collect in property taxes. The bill also provides a new tax exemption for homeowners who already receive a homestead tax credit and changes how commercial property is taxed. Additionally, it updates rules for funding workforce housing and how money is distributed from the state's education fund.1
Read the official explanation
This bill relates to state and local government taxes, budgets, and authority, by modifying provisions relating to the assessment and taxation of property, funding from the secure an advanced vision for education fund, urban renewal areas, establishing a program for certain first-time homebuyers, and establishing a local government efficiency grant fund. DIVISION I —— PROPERTY TAX REVENUE LIMITATIONS —— BOND REVENUE USE LIMITATIONS.35 provides that for governmental entity budgets certified for budget years beginning on or after July 1, 2027, proposed unassigned reserve funds identified within a governmental entity’s general fund shall not exceed an amount equal to 35 percent of the budgeted expenditures from the governmental entity’s general fund for the prior fiscal year before any budgeted transfers from such general fund. 17 and the governmental entity shall remedy the violation and recertify the budget. For purposes of this provision, the bill defines “governmental entity” to mean any unit of government or other public body or public corporation, including any intergovernmental entity, that has the power to impose or certify a property tax levy, but excludes school districts.8 relating to unexpended funds of county agricultural extensions.35 shall be performed, including verification of the circumstances resulting in actual reserve funds exceeding the specified limits.25, which establishes a maximum aggregate amount of property tax dollars that may be certified for levy among all property tax levies imposed by a governmental entity other than a school district, excluding debt service levies. For the budget year beginning July 1, 2027, and each budget year thereafter, the maximum aggregate amount of property tax dollars that may be certified for levy among all property tax levies imposed by a governmental entity against property that is not new valuation, as defined in the bill, shall not exceed an amount equal to the sum of 102 percent of the aggregate amount of property tax dollars certified for levy by the governmental entity among all property tax levies imposed by the governmental entity for the preceding fiscal year for each of the governmental entity’s property tax levies for the budget year. If the budget year includes a voter-approved property tax levy that was not approved for imposition in the preceding fiscal year, the maximum aggregate amount of property tax dollars for the governmental entity for the budget year is increased by the amount of the voter-approved property tax levy approved at election for the budget year.25, the department of management shall reduce each of the applicable governmental entity’s property tax levies on a pro rata basis so that the governmental entity is in compliance.25 does not remove or otherwise affect property tax limitations, including levy rate and use limitations, otherwise provided by law for any property tax levy of the governmental entity.25.26, which provides that, on or after July 1, 2026, a governmental entity, as defined in the bill, shall not issue bonds or other indebtedness payable from an ad valorem property tax levy for the purpose of funding the general operations of the governmental entity or otherwise use proceeds from the sale of bonds or issuance of other indebtedness to fund general operations. The bill defines “general operations” to mean services or activities generally funded from the governmental entity’s general fund, which are necessary for the operation of the governmental entity, including salaries and benefits, or which are for the health and welfare of the governmental entity’s citizens or primarily intended to benefit all residents of the governmental entity, but excluding services financed by statutory funds other than a debt service fund. The department of management, following consultation with the city finance committee and the county finance committee, may adopt rules under Code chapter 17A to implement the new Code section governing funding of general operations. DIVISION II —— COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY ASSESSMENT LIMITATIONS.21 imposes an assessment limitation (rollback) on commercial property, industrial property, and property valued by the department of revenue under Code chapter 434 (railway company property). For valuations established for the assessment year beginning January 1, 2022, and each assessment year thereafter, the portion of actual value at which each property unit of commercial property shall be assessed shall be the sum of the following: (1) an amount equal to the product of the assessment limitation percentage applicable to residential property multiplied by the actual value of the property that exceeds $0 but does not exceed $150,000; and (2) an amount equal to 90 percent of the actual value of the property for that assessment year that exceeds $150,000. The limitation, by operation of law, applies to the assessed value of railway company property. The bill increases the amount of value subject to the residential assessment limitation rates from $150,000 to $350,000 for each property unit.21(5)(c)(2) apply retroactively to assessment years beginning on or after January 1, 2026.21(5)(e) for payments to replace property taxes due to the application of the residential property assessment limitation to certain portions of commercial and industrial property valuations. DIVISION III —— HOMESTEAD PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION. The bill establishes a property tax exemption for residential property that is receiving a homestead property tax credit. For assessment years beginning on or after January 1, 2026, a property tax exemption is allowed on each such property in addition to any exemption or credit for such property under any other provision of law. The exemption is 10 percent of the taxable value of the property or $25,000 in taxable value, whichever is less. However, the exemption shall not apply to a property tax imposed by a school district.7 provides that for a property tax credit or exemption enacted on or after January 1, 1997, if a state appropriation made to fund the credit or exemption is not sufficient to fully fund the credit or exemption, the political subdivision shall be required to extend to the taxpayer only that portion of the credit or exemption estimated by the department of revenue to be funded by the state appropriation.7 inapplicable to the exemption established in this division. DIVISION IV —— SECURE AN ADVANCED VISION FOR EDUCATION FUND —— EQUITY TRANSFER PERCENTAGE —— FUTURE REPEAL. Prior to allocation of moneys available in the secure an advanced vision for education fund to school districts on a per-pupil basis, certain amounts are calculated and allocated to other funds.2 establishes a calculation for an equity transfer percentage that is used, in part, to determine amounts distributed and credited to the foundation base supplement fund and the property tax equity and relief fund.5 percent; and for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2034, and each fiscal year thereafter, is 30 percent.2 for fiscal years beginning on or after July 1, 2026, the department of management shall adjust or reconcile actual amounts to be received by school districts in the fiscal year immediately following the fiscal year during which the revenues were collected. Current law repeals Code chapter 423F that establishes the secure an advanced vision for education fund and lowers the state sales and use tax rate from 6 percent to 5 percent on January 1, 2051. The bill extends that repeal and reduction date to January 1, 2071. DIVISION V —— PROPERTY PARCEL INFORMATION. The bill requires each county auditor to submit an annual report not later than January 1 to the department of management containing parcel-level property data, including parcel identification information, location, size, valuation, classification, types of structures and improvements, exemptions, credits, and whether the parcel is subject to a division of revenue. The bill authorizes the department of management to require the report to include additional parcel-level data deemed necessary by the director of the department of management. The bill requires the department of management to prescribe the form and manner of submitting such annual report. DIVISION VI —— URBAN RENEWAL. The bill amends the definition of “economic development” for purposes of Code chapter 15 to also include the provision of workforce housing. The bill adds development policies that advance the development of workforce housing to the list of factors required to be considered by the public body before public funds are used for grants, loans, tax incentives, or other financial assistance to private persons or on behalf of private persons for economic development under Code chapter 15.353 (workforce housing). The bill also modifies the defined term “low or moderate income families” in Code chapter 403 to “low and moderate income families” to align with the terminology usage within the Code chapter.19 (tax increment financing) if levied against property located in an incorporated area upon which new construction or renovations begin on or after the effective date of this division of the bill, unless such construction or renovations were approved and subject to an agreement adopted before January 1, 2026. The bill also excludes taxes for emergency medical services imposed pursuant to Code chapter 357F, 357G, or 422D from the division of revenue. The bill prohibits such taxes from being divided and paid into the municipality’s special fund for the payment of urban renewal indebtedness but instead requires the tax to be levied, collected, and paid to the school district, emergency medical services district, city emergency medical services district, or county in the same manner as all other property taxes. The exclusions in the bill apply to property taxes due and payable in fiscal years beginning on or after July 1, 2027.22(5) (10 years), after 20 years following the effective date of this division of the bill or after 20 years from the calendar year following the calendar year in which the municipality first certifies to the county auditor the amount of any loans, advances, indebtedness, or bonds which qualify for payment from the division of revenue, whichever is later, the amount of taxes that is authorized to be paid into the municipality’s urban renewal special fund shall not exceed 60 percent of the amount otherwise authorized, but for the bill, and such excess amounts shall be allocated and paid to the respective taxing districts in the same manner as other taxes. The municipality may exceed this limitation to the extent necessary for the payment of bonds or other indebtedness incurred before the effective date of this division of the bill and this limitation does not apply to divisions of revenue established by community colleges under Code chapter 260E or by rural improvement zones under Code chapter 357H.17(10) (20 years), an ordinance providing for a division of revenue adopted on or after the effective date of this division of the bill shall be limited to 23 years from the calendar year following the calendar year in which the municipality first certifies to the county auditor the amount of any loans, advances, indebtedness, or bonds that qualify for payment from the division of revenue. The ordinance shall terminate and be of no further force and effect following the 23-year period. The 23-year limitation does not apply to divisions of revenue established by community colleges under Code chapter 260E or rural improvement zones under Code chapter 357H. Under current law, any urban renewal area established upon the determination that the area is an economic development area, a division of revenue (tax increment financing) shall not be allowed for the purpose of providing or aiding in the provision of public improvements related to housing and residential development, unless the municipality assures that the project will include assistance for low and moderate income family housing, subject to certain municipality population thresholds. The bill modifies such assistance requirements and the population thresholds. Current law provides that for municipalities with a population of 5,000 or less, the municipality need not provide any low or moderate income family housing assistance if a housing needs assessment shows there is no need. The bill eliminates the housing needs assessment requirement. The bill combines the two population threshold categories for municipalities over 5,000 in population and provides that the amount of assistance for low and moderate income family housing shall be equal to or greater than the percentage of the original project cost that is equal to the percentage of low and moderate income residents for the county in which the urban renewal area is located as determined by the United States department of housing and urban development using section 8 guidelines. The bill, however, establishes a maximum amount of assistance that is the lesser of 20 percent of the original project cost, or $350,000 if the municipality is a city or $300,000 if the municipality is a county. These changes apply to existing and newly established urban renewal areas. The bill also eliminates the 10-year limitation on the division of revenue for certain projects relating to housing and residential development in urban renewal areas that are economic development areas for ordinances adopted on or after the effective date of this division of the bill. Such ordinances adopted on or after the effective date of this division of the bill are subject to the 20-year limitation for economic development areas. This division of the bill takes effect upon enactment. DIVISION VII —— ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES.21(3) by providing that for assessment years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, if the taxpayer’s property has increased in actual value by 10 percent or more from the immediately preceding reassessment year or the most recent assessment year following such reassessment year if the property was revalued or reassessed in that assessment year, the assessor shall provide the taxpayer with a statement of the reasons for the increase in actual value, information specifying the portion of actual value increase attributable to a change in classification, revaluation, new construction, improvements, or renovations to the property, and all information in any formula or method used to determine the actual value.21(3), the burden of proof is upon any complainant attacking a property valuation as excessive, inadequate, inequitable, or capricious. However, when the complainant offers competent evidence that the market value of the property is different than the market value determined by the assessor, the burden of proof thereafter is upon the officials or persons seeking to uphold such valuation to be assessed. The bill modifies the burden of proof in certain circumstances. For assessment years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, if the taxpayer’s property actual value increased by 10 percent or more from the immediately preceding reassessment year or the most recent assessment year following such reassessment year if the property was revalued or reassessed in that assessment year, including an increase as the result of an equalization order, and the property did not change classification or primary use and the increase in actual value is not the result of new construction, improvements, or renovations to the property, the actual value so determined by the assessor is not presumed to be the actual value and in any protest or appeal the assessor shall have the burden of proof that the valuation is not excessive, inadequate, inequitable, or capricious.33 to provide that ex parte communications with board of review members are prohibited in protests before the board. DIVISION VIII —— LOCAL GOVERNMENT EFFICIENCY GRANT PROGRAM. The bill establishes a local government efficiency grant fund program and fund. The bill appropriates $10 million to the fund. For purposes of the program, “local government” means a county, city, township, or any special-purpose district or authority. The bill appropriates moneys in the fund to Iowa state university to provide, following approval by a commission provided for in the bill, grants to local governments to assist in efforts to increase government efficiency. The bill requires the commission to adopt rules to establish and administer the grant program to provide for the allocation of moneys in the fund in the form of competitive grants to local governments. DIVISION IX —— FIRSTHOME IOWA ACCOUNTS. The bill establishes a FirstHome Iowa program, which allows citizens of the state to invest money in a public trust for future application to the payment of qualified homebuyer expenses. A FirstHome Iowa program trust is created and the treasurer of state is the trustee of the trust. The bill grants to the treasurer of state all powers necessary to carry out and effectuate the purposes and objectives of the trust, including the power to make and enter into contracts, accept any moneys for purposes of the program, carry out studies and projections to advise participants regarding present and estimated future qualified homebuyer expenses, procure insurance against any loss in connection with the trust, enter into participation agreements with participants, make payments to or on behalf of beneficiaries for qualified homebuyer expenses, and invest moneys from the program fund in any investments which are determined by the treasurer of state to be appropriate. The trust may enter into participation agreements with participants on behalf of beneficiaries. The participant contributes moneys into an account for a beneficiary, who is an individual to benefit from advance payments of qualified homebuyer expenses on behalf of the beneficiary. Moneys accrued by participants in an account may be used for payments to or on behalf of a beneficiary for qualified homebuyer expenses. The bill defines “qualified homebuyer expenses” to mean any of the following: (1) a down payment or closing costs for the qualified purchase of a single-family residence in Iowa that is the principal residence of the beneficiary if such beneficiary is a first-time homebuyer with respect to such purchase; (2) a cost, fee, tax, or payment incurred by, or charged or assigned to, a beneficiary as part of the purchase; or (3) any United States veterans administration funding fee incurred by the beneficiary in connection with a veterans administration home loan guaranty program. The bill defines “first-time homebuyer” to mean an individual who is a resident of Iowa and who does not own, either individually or jointly, a single-family or multifamily residence, and who has not owned or purchased, either individually or jointly, a single-family or multifamily residence for a period of three years prior to the date of the qualified purchase for which the eligible home costs are paid or reimbursed from an account. Under the bill, “qualified purchase” means the purchase of a single-family residence in Iowa by the account’s beneficiary 90 or more days after the date the participant first opened the account. The bill establishes an Iowa income tax deduction for the participant in an agreement for amounts contributed to an account by the participant during the applicable tax year, not to exceed $5,500 per beneficiary per year adjusted annually to reflect increases in the consumer price index. Additionally, income from interest and earnings received from the FirstHome Iowa program trust created in new Code chapter 12L is deducted from income. Distributions or transfers from an account are considered income for Iowa income tax purposes, to the extent such amount was previously deducted as a contribution to the trust, if the amount is used for purposes other than the payment of qualified homebuyer expenses. The bill allows a beneficiary under an agreement to be changed and allows agreements to be amended in order to enable participants to increase or decrease the level of participation, change the designation of successors, and carry out similar matters as authorized by rule. The bill requires the treasurer of state to segregate moneys received by the trust into two funds: (1) the FirstHome Iowa program fund, which includes moneys paid into accounts by participants; and (2) the administrative fund to be used for administration of the program, which includes administrative fees collected. The bill establishes procedures for the cancellation of agreements or termination of the program, requirements for ownership of payments made under an agreement, requirements related to income derived from investments, and establishes audit and reporting requirements for the program. The bill amends the Iowa first-time homebuyer savings account Act under Code chapter 541B to allow for the withdrawal and deposit of account balances under Code chapter 541B to accounts within the FirstHome Iowa program trust without penalty or taxation in this state if such withdrawal is deposited in an account within the FirstHome Iowa program trust within 30 days of the withdrawal. The bill also authorizes the treasurer of state to, by rule, provide for the direct transfer of moneys within an account under Code chapter 541B to a FirstHome Iowa program trust account without penalty or taxation in this state. The bill prohibits new accounts under Code chapter 541B from being established on or after July 1, 2026. DIVISION X —— VALUATIONS —— ABNORMAL TRANSACTIONS —— REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX FORMS.7 governing real estate transfer tax forms for the declaration of value prescribed by the department of revenue by specifying examples of the types of special facts and circumstances that may distort market value. The bill modifies the list of examples of abnormal property transactions that are to be excluded from consideration or adjusted to eliminate distortions of market value when valuing property to include built-to-suit construction, sale-leaseback transactions, leased fee sales, and instead of sales to immediate family, sales between related parties. This division of the bill applies retroactively to assessment years beginning on or after January 1, 2026. DIVISION XI —— LOCAL GOVERNMENT BUDGET STATEMENTS.2A requires the county auditor to mail statements containing certain county, city, and school district budget and property tax information to each property owner or taxpayer. For budgets for fiscal years beginning on or after July 1, 2027, the bill authorizes those statements to be to be posted on the political subdivision’s internet site by March 15 in lieu of mailing individual statements. Additionally, if the political subdivision maintains a social media account on one or more social media applications, the statement or an electronic link to the statement shall be posted on each such account on a date no later than March 15.2A, in part, requires the county auditor to provide by mail individual statements to property taxpayers that includes various pieces of information relating to the property tax dollars and levies of cities, counties, and school districts. The bill provides that such statements will also include information for all other certifying boards that are not a city, county, or school; however, all such entities shall be considered a single political subdivision and identified under a designation of “special taxing districts” on each statement. The bill also strikes the current list of items that must be included on each individual statement and establishes the minimum contents for the statement. The bill requires that the statements be clear, concise, and written in plain language, and provides that the information in the individual statements may be presented using tables, written narrative, and graphic representations, and shall contain the internet site, mailing address, and a telephone number for each political subdivision that owners and taxpayers may call if they have questions related to the statement. The bill requires the department of management to consult with the Iowa league of cities and the Iowa state association of counties prior to prescribing the form for the statements.3.2(3), which would relieve a political subdivision from complying with a state mandate if funding for the cost of the state mandate is not provided or specified. Therefore, political subdivisions are required to comply with any state mandate included in this division of the bill. This division of the bill applies to political subdivision budgets for fiscal years beginning on or after July 1, 2027. DIVISION XII —— DIVISION OF REVENUE —— DATA CENTERS.19 (tax increment financing) for taxes levied against a qualified data center.3(95), began on or after the effective date of the division of the bill, which is effective upon enactment. The bill prohibits such foundation property tax from being divided and paid into the municipality’s special fund for the payment of urban renewal indebtedness but instead requires the tax to be levied, collected, and paid to the school district in the same manner as all other property taxes. The exclusion in the bill applies to property taxes due and payable in fiscal years beginning on or after July 1, 2027. DIVISION XIII —— ELECTION DATES —— BONDS.2(4)(d) specifies the special election date for political subdivisions if the election is in whole or in part for the question of issuing bonds or other indebtedness is the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November. The bill adds the first Tuesday after the first Monday in June as a date for such an election. The bill, however, provides that a political subdivision shall not hold an election on the question of issuing bonds or other indebtedness on two such consecutive election dates authorized under that provision. DIVISION XIV —— EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES LEVY.75 per $1,000 of assessed value county property tax levy for emergency medical services if approved at election.50 per $1,000 of assessed value if such increased rate is approved at an election held on or after July 1, 2026. DIVISION XV —— UTILITY REPLACEMENT TAX TASK FORCE.15(7) establishes a utility replacement tax task force. The bill modifies the duties of the task force to study the accuracy of the taxes imposed under Code chapters 437A and 437B, ways to modernize the administration of such taxes, methods of simplifying administration of the replacement taxes, elimination of property taxes imposed under Code chapter 437A or 437B, simplification of thresholds for replacement tax rate adjustments while retaining tax stability, and the effects of such taxes on local taxing authorities, local taxing districts, consumers, and taxpayers through December 31, 2026, including ways to maintain continuity for local taxing districts and consumers and ways to provide a competitive and equitable tax environment for taxpayers. If the task force recommends modifications to the replacement taxes, the department of management shall transmit those recommendations to the general assembly. This division of the bill takes effect upon enactment. DIVISION XVI —— SCHOOL DISTRICT UNSPENT BALANCES —— ON-TIME FUNDING AND MODIFIED SUPPLEMENTAL AMOUNTS.7 determines the authorized expenditures of a school district for a budget year, which in part includes the addition of the actual unspent balance from the preceding year.31.13 authorizes an on-time funding budget adjustment for school districts when the district’s actual enrollment for the budget year is greater than the district’s budget enrollment for the budget year and the school budget review committee is required to establish a modified supplemental amount for such a school district if the district adopts a resolution to receive the adjustment and notifies the school budget review committee. Under the bill, for school budget years beginning on or after July 1, 2026, the school budget review committee may establish a modified supplemental amount if the district has adopted a resolution and notifies the school budget review committee on or before a date established by the committee.7 or other methodology specified in the policy. The policy shall also state the date the policy was adopted and the date the policy was most recently reviewed or revised. The targeted range and maximum amount established in the policy shall be made with the intent to equalize educational opportunity, provide a good education for all the children of the school district, provide property tax relief, decrease the percentage of school costs paid from property taxes, and to provide reasonable control of school costs. Targeted ranges and maximum amounts defined in the policy shall be reviewed annually by the board of directors and such review shall be entered in the minutes of the board and approved revisions shall be made to the policy. This division of the bill takes effect upon enactment.
Why it matters. Local governments and businesses would face new limits on property tax levies and unassigned reserve funds, while commercial and industrial properties would see more of their value assessed at residential rates. The Department of Management estimates information technology implementation costs will range between $19,000 and $40,000. This legislation is estimated to reduce property tax revenue to local governments by $111.4 million in fiscal year 2028 and eliminates a $125.0 million General Fund appropriation for local government backfill effective fiscal year 2028.2
House subcommittee
Named January 21, 2026 (as HSB 596). On January 29, 2026 it recommended passage.
- Rep. Carter F. Nordman REmail
- Rep. Jane Bloomingdale REmail
- Rep. Larry McBurney DEmail
- Rep. Aime Wichtendahl DEmail
- Rep. David E. Young REmail
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
1 written public comment to its subcommittee: January 29, 2026 (1) · on the Legislature’s site
Fiscal note
AI summary This bill makes various changes to property tax assessments, rates, credits, and local government budget processes. The Department of Management estimates information technology implementation costs will range between $19,000 and $40,000. Division I is estimated to reduce property tax revenue to local governments by $111.4 million in fiscal year 2028, with the reduction increasing in subsequent years. Division II eliminates a $125.0 million General Fund appropriation for local government backfill effective fiscal year 2028.4
Read the fiscal note
Note on Fiscal Estimates
Due to the complexity and interdependence of the Bill’s provisions, including multiple changes to the property tax base and levy structure, division-level estimates cannot be combined to produce a total fiscal impact. Therefore, the estimates below are provided independently and should not be summed to determine the overall fiscal impact, and each Division is modeled independently of the other Divisions.
The Department of Management (DOM) estimates the information technology (IT) costs to implement all Divisions of the Bill to range between $19,000 and $40,000.
Note on Property Taxes
All property tax rates used in this document are reflected as rates that are applied per $1,000 of taxed property value. Taxed property value is the value determined through the assessment process, adjusted (reduced) for any rollback for the property class, and after property tax exemptions have been applied.
Summary
House File 2745 is composed of 16 divisions that are related to property tax assessments, rates, credits, exemptions, budget processes and other related programs that do the following:
- Division I limits the growth of certain property tax levies for local governments to 102.0% of the prior year’s budget, with specified adjustments and exclusions.
- Division II modifies the assessment limitation for commercial and industrial property by expanding the portion of value subject to the residential rollback rate.
- Division III establishes a homestead property tax exemption equal to 10.0% of taxable value of the home, up to $25,000 per homestead.
- Division IV modifies the Secure an Advanced Vision for Education (SAVE) Fund Equity Transfer percentage and extends the Fund’s repeal to January 1, 2027.
- Division V requires county auditors to submit an annual report that includes parcel identification information.
- Division VI modifies provisions related to urban renewal areas and tax increment financing (TIF), including exempting certain levies, setting fixed durations to TIF Districts, and capping housing investment requirements.
- Division VII modifies provisions related to property assessments.
- Division VIII creates the Local Government Efficiency Grant Program and appropriates $10.0 million from the General Fund.
- Division IX creates the FirstHome Iowa Program and related fund to assist with first-time homeownership.
- Division X modifies provisions related to distorted market valuations.
- Division XI makes changes to local government property tax statements and procedures.
- Division XII modifies provisions related to the property tax treatment and exemption structure for data center property.
- Division XIV establishes a voter-approved emergency medical services (EMS) levy above the current maximum levy rate.
- Division XV establishes a Utility Replacement Tax Task Force.
- Division XVI establishes an unspent balance cap and allows schools to request a budget adjustment.
Division I — Property Tax Revenue Limitations — Bond Revenue Use Limitations
Description
Division I of the Bill does the following related to property tax revenue limitations:
- Disallows unassigned reserve funds identified within a government entity’s general fund from exceeding 35.0%, beginning in FY 2028. Establishes penalties for noncompliance.
- Repeals Iowa Code section 176A.8(13), which would disallow an agricultural extension to carry forward unexpended funds.
- Limits property tax revenues to 102.0% of the prior years’ revenues, excluding debt service and school districts, beginning in FY 2028.
- Includes replacement taxes detailed in Iowa Code chapters 437A and 437B in the 102.0% cap in the Bill and provides penalties for noncompliance.
- Restricts local government entities from issuing bonds or other debt for general operations beginning in FY 2027.
- Permits the DOM, in consultation with city and county finance committees, to adopt administrative rules to implement Section 7 of Division I of the Bill.
Background
Under current law, Iowa’s property tax system includes multiple layers of limitations and controls that collectively influence local government revenues and tax burdens. These include biannual equalization of assessed values, annual assessment limitations (rollback) by property class, statutory levy rate limits, the school aid formula, and the local government budget and certification process. Property owners also may appeal valuations through a structured protest and appeals process.
Iowa’s property tax cycle begins with the assessment of property values as of January 1, followed by assessment protests, equalization by the Department of Revenue, application of rollback to determine taxable values, and, finally, the adoption of local budgets and levy rates prior to the issuance of tax bills. Local government levy authority is further constrained by statutory rate limits and growth mechanisms. Recent legislation, including 2023 Iowa Acts, House File 718 (Property Tax, Assessments, and Board Ethics Act), and 2024 Iowa Acts, Senate File 2442 (Individual Income Tax Rate Act), modified these limitations by tying allowable levy growth to taxable valuation growth through tiered or inflation-adjusted mechanisms. In addition, school district funding operates under the school aid formula, which combines a uniform property tax levy of $5.40 per $1,000 of taxable valuation with State General Fund aid to meet the foundation level. This structure further integrates State and local funding decisions within the overall property tax system.
Assumptions
- The estimate projects district-level taxable valuation growth using a 12-year average of historical odd- and even-year growth rates by property class, beginning with assessment year (AY) 2024 values, used to account for large shifts in odd years during equalization. To moderate volatility in district-level growth across property classes, projected growth rates were bounded between the 15th and 80th percentiles to limit extreme fluctuations.
- Levy rates for all authorities are held constant at AY 2024 levels, and revenue growth is constrained through application of a 102.0% annual growth limitation on included levies at the district level. Any revenues that grow more than 102.0% compared to last year’s budgeted property tax revenues are artificially scaled back, representing the bulk of the decreased property taxes estimated by this Division.
- The estimate separates the base valuation from a new valuation using AY 2024 proportions, allowing revenue generated from new valuation to grow outside of the cap.
- Levies excluded from the growth limitation, including school district levies and debt service levies, are modeled under current law and added back after the cap is applied.
- This Fiscal Note assumes no behavioral response from local governments, assumes no changes in levy structure, and holds the relative composition of the tax base constant over time.
- Property tax revenue impacts are first seen in FY 2028.
Fiscal Impact
The analysis of this Division models the fiscal impact of this Division in isolation and does not account for interactions or combined effects with other divisions of the Bill. Figure 1 displays the estimated reduction in property tax revenue to local governments.
Figure 1 — Property Tax Revenue Reduction (in Millions)AY/FY
Current
Law
Revenue
Included
Revenue
Excluded
Revenue
Cap
Ceiling
Included
Allowed
Included
Revenue
Allowed
Total
Revenue
Local
Revenue
Reduction
2024/2026 7,812.1$ 0.0$ 0.0$ 0.0$ 0.0$ 0.0$ 0.0$ 2025/2027 8,234.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2026/2028 8,519.7 3,977.8 4,541.9 3,948.5 3,866.5 8,408.3 -111.4 2027/2029 8,912.0 4,166.5 4,745.6 4,069.7 3,983.0 8,728.6 -183.4 2028/2030 9,231.0 4,317.7 4,913.3 4,195.6 4,104.7 9,018.0 -213.0 2029/2031 9,667.8 4,528.4 5,139.4 4,326.7 4,231.2 9,370.6 -297.2 2030/2032 10,024.9 4,698.6 5,326.3 4,463.9 4,363.8 9,690.1 -334.8 2031/2033 10,512.4 4,934.7 5,577.7 4,607.1 4,502.0 10,079.7 -432.7 Division II — Commercial and Industrial Property Assessment Limitations
Description
Division II of the Bill does the following related to commercial and industrial property assessment limitations:
- Amends the two-tier assessments of commercial and industrial properties and increases the residential rollback threshold from $150,000 to $350,000 of the assessed value.
- Eliminates the standing General Fund appropriation of $125.0 million for the backfill to local governments, effective in FY 2028.
The sections of Division II increasing the residential rollback threshold from $150,000 to $350,000 apply retroactively for assessment years beginning on or after January 1, 2026.
Background
The Two-Tier Assessment Limitation (TTAL) program, previously referred to as the Business Property Tax Credit (BPTC), began in FY 2024 with the passage of 2022 Iowa Acts, chapter 1061 (Department of Revenue Omnibus Act), which modified the assessment limitation applied to commercial and industrial property. Under TTAL, commercial and industrial property classes are no longer subject to a single uniform rollback percentage, and instead a two-tier structure is applied to the assessed value of each parcel pursuant to Iowa Code section 441.21. Under this system, the first $150,000 of a commercial or industrial property’s assessed value is subject to the lower residential rollback percentage, while the remaining value is subject to the commercial and industrial 90.0% rollback percentage. In practice, this results in a lower taxable value for a portion of each parcel. The rollback percentages are certified annually by the Department of Revenue and are applied by local governments to determine taxable valuation for property tax purposes.
The TTAL system replaced the BPTC, which provided a State-funded credit on a portion of commercial and industrial property taxes, by instead reducing taxable value directly through the assessment limitation structure. Since the implementation of TTAL, $125.0 million has been appropriated annually from the General Fund each year to the Department of Revenue for payments to local governments to replace property taxes lost due to the rollback. In FY 2025, the appropriation was able to fund 81.2% of the total requested $153.9 million in reimbursement requests.
Assumptions
- The Bill eliminates the $125.0 million State General Fund standing appropriation backfill associated with the prior credit structure. As a result, reductions in taxable valuations from the expanded assessment limitation are not offset by State payments and will result in a direct reduction in property tax revenues to local governments. The school foundation property tax $5.40 backfill associated with TIF does not apply to these valuation changes.
- The average taxable valuations of commercial/industrial properties that will benefit from the increased $350,000 threshold is unknown. The estimate assumes that 50.0% of the maximum additional benefit will be realized.
- The proportion of commercial and industrial property value affected by the expanded threshold remains constant over the projection period and grows at the same rate as total commercial and industrial taxable valuation.
- The proportion of commercial and industrial property value affected by the expanded threshold is assumed to remain constant over the projection period and grows annually at the statewide weighted average rate of commercial and industrial taxable valuation, using separate odd- and even-year growth rates. The weighted growth rates used in the estimate are approximately 3.84% in odd years and 0.48% in even years.
- The AY 2024 residential assessment limitation of 47.4316% and commercial/industrial limitation of 90.0% is assumed fixed for all future years.
- The AY 2023 total requested amount of $153.9 million is used as the baseline for projecting future amounts under both the $150,000 threshold under current law and the proposed $350,000 threshold. The maximum projected amount under the proposed $350,000 threshold is estimated by applying a proportional factor of 2.3 to current law projections, reflecting the increase in the maximum value eligible for the residential rollback.
Fiscal Impact
The analysis of this Division estimates the fiscal impact of this Division in isolation and does not account for interactions or combined effects with other divisions of the Bill. Figure 2 displays the estimated reduction in property tax revenue to local governments in addition to the elimination of the $125.0 million General Fund backfill appropriation. Figure 2 — Two-Tier Assessment Limitation Increase (in Millions) Division III — Homestead Property Tax Exemption
Description
Division III establishes a new homestead property tax exemption equal to the lesser of $25,000 or 10.0% of a residential property’s taxable value and excludes the exemption from school district levies.
Division III makes Iowa Code section 25B.7(1) on funding property tax credits and exemptions inapplicable to the Homestead Property Tax exemption changes in the Division. Division III applies retroactively to assessment years beginning on or after January 1, 2026.
Background
Iowa law provides several property tax credits and exemptions that apply to homestead properties. These programs reduce taxable valuation or tax liability for eligible homeowners and are administered through a combination of State-funded credits and local property tax adjustments. State-funded reductions in tax liability (credits) and reductions in taxable value (exemptions) are governed under Iowa Code chapter 425. Examples include:
- The Homestead Tax Credit, which reduces the taxable value of eligible owner-occupied residential property.Fiscal
Year
Minimium
Projection Under
$150,000
Threshold
Maximum
Projection Under
$350,000
Threshold
Estimated
Reduction Under
$350,000
Threshold
General Fund
Backfill
($5.40 levy)
Local Revenue
Reduction
2026 154.6$ 0.0$ 0.0$ 0.0$ 0.0$ 2027 160.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2028 161.3 376.4 268.9 44.9 -224.0 2029 167.5 390.8 279.2 46.6 -232.6 2030 168.3 392.7 280.5 46.8 -233.7 2031 174.8 407.8 291.3 48.6 -242.7 2032 175.6 409.7 292.7 48.9 -243.8 2033 182.3 425.5 303.9 50.7 -253.2
- The Elderly and Disabled Tax Credit, which provides additional relief based on income eligibility.
- The Military Service Tax Exemption, which provides a partial exemption for qualifying veterans.
- The Disabled Veteran Homestead Credit, which provides a full exemption for certain qualifying veterans.
Assumptions
- In AY 2024, there were an estimated 743,790 homesteads in Iowa, and that number is assumed to remain constant for all future years. The applicable homesteads had a combined estimated assessed value of $263.379 billion.
- Assessed valuations are assumed to grow at a rate of 2.0% year over year.
- The AY 2024 residential assessment limitation of 47.4316% is assumed to remain constant for all future years.
- The assessed value of the average homestead was derived using the 2025 first quarter median home price published by the National Association of Realtors. The average consolidated tax rate of 32.42171 was adjusted to exclude the school district share of property taxes using a statewide average proportion of 40.13%, resulting in an effective non-school tax rate of 19.41088 for purposes of this exemption. This resulted in an average statewide property tax bill of $2,831 before any tax credits or other reductions were applied.
- The homestead exemption is calculated as 10.0% of taxable value up to a maximum of $25,000 per homestead.
- The fiscal impact of this Division will begin in FY 2028. Figure 3 below displays the average homestead property tax reduction using the above assumptions.
- Because Iowa Code section 25B.7(1) is made inapplicable under Division III, the school foundation property tax $5.40 backfill does not apply to these valuation changes. Figure 3 — Estimated Average Property Tax Reduction per
Homestead Exemption
Fiscal Impact
The analysis of this Division estimates the fiscal impact of this Division in isolation and does not account for interactions or combined effects with other divisions of the Bill. Figure 4 displays the estimated reduction in property tax revenue to local governments.
Figure 4 — New Homestead Revenue Impact (in Millions)FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 190.00$ 190.00$ 190.00$ 200.00$ 200.00$ 210.00$AY/FY
Assessed
Value
Taxable
Value
Homestead
Exempt Value
Local Revenue
Reduction
2024/2026 263,379$ 122,936.9$ 0.0$ 0.0$ 2025/2027 268,646.5 127,423.3 0.0 0.0 2026/2028 274,019.4 129,971.8 7,145.6 -138.7 2027/2029 279,499.8 132,571.2 7,288.5 -141.5 2028/2030 285,089.8 135,222.7 7,434.2 -144.3 2029/2031 290,791.6 137,927.1 7,582.9 -147.2 2030/2032 296,607.4 140,685.6 7,734.6 -150.1 2031/2033 302,539.6 143,499.4 7,889.3 -153.1 Division IV — Secure an Advanced Vision for Education Fund — Equity Transfer Percentage — Future Repeal
Description
Division IV extends the statewide sales tax rate of 6.0% and the SAVE Fund from a repeal date of January 1, 2051, to January 1, 2071, and allocates 30.0% of SAVE funds to property tax relief by FY 2035. The change will be gradually implemented to increase the share of the SAVE Fund that will be used for property tax relief. The Bill requires the Department of Management (DOM) to adjust or reconcile SAVE funds to be received by school districts in the fiscal year immediately following the fiscal year during which the revenues were collected.
Background
Secure an Advanced Vision for Education is a statewide 1-cent sales tax dedicated to K-12 infrastructure such as new school construction, major renovations, technology infrastructure, paying debt on eligible school bonds, and property tax relief. The Department of Education (DE) is required to issue an annual legislative report detailing the collection and use of SAVE funds.
Assumptions
- There is no additional administrative burden to the State for changes made in the Bill.
- Annual growth for school infrastructure sales tax will be as follows:
- FY 2027 = 2.00%
- FY 2028 = 2.90%
- FY 2029 = 2.90%
- FY 2030 = 3.20%
- FY 2031 = 3.50%
- FY 2032 = 2.45%
- FY 2033 = 2.45%
- FY 2034 = 2.45%
- FY 2035 = 2.45%
Fiscal Impact
Division IV is expected to have no fiscal impact to the State for administrative purposes. The Bill is expected to increase SAVE contributions to property tax relief by $20.9 million in FY 2027, increasing to $110.4 million in FY 2033. Figure 5 illustrates the estimated statewide impact of HF 2745 on property tax relief.
Figure 5 — SAVE Contribution Transfer Impact (in Millions) Division V — Property Parcel Information
Description
Division V of the Bill requires local governments to annually report parcel-level property data by January 1 of each year to the DOM.
Fiscal Impact
The fiscal impact of Division V is unknown.
Division VI — Urban Renewal
Description
Division VI of the Bill does the following related to urban renewal:
- Changes the definition of “low or moderate income families” to “low and moderate income families” (or LMI families) who earn no more than 80.0% of the median family income of the county or statewide median income as reported by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).
- All TIF districts created without an end date are restricted to collect only 60.0% of the available TIF revenues 20 years following the effective date of Division VI or 20 years from the calendar year that loans, advances, indebtedness, or bonds were first taken out, whichever is later. This limitation does not apply to community colleges.
- Limits all urban renewal revenues created after the passage of this Bill to 20 years or 23 years, for TIFs categorized as Economic Development/Slum and Blight, from the calendar date that loans, advances, debt, or bonds are first certified. Once a TIF reaches their limitation, the local ordinance automatically terminates and revenue associated with the urban renewal is no longer collected. This limitation does not apply to community colleges.
- Excludes school district foundation property taxes and EMS property tax levies from urban renewal capture.
- Changes urban renewal financial requirements for LMI family housing by lowering the population criteria of municipalities from 15,000 to 5,000, and updates required expenditures on LMI housing projects from 10.0% to the lesser of 20.0% of the project cost, or $350,000.
- Property Taxes, Local Government Budgets, and Credits · April 14, 2026
- Property Taxes, Local Government Budgets, and Credits · April 8, 2026
Iowa Code it changes
Creates§12L.1§12L.10§12L.2§12L.3§12L.4§12L.5§12L.6§12L.7§12L.8§12L.9§24.35§279.63A§28E.20§444.25§444.26
Amends§11.11§12G.2§15A.1§176A.8§232D.503§24.2A§24.3§24.34§24.48§257.13§257.7§331.434§331.435§331.510§384.17§384.18§39.2§403.17§403.19§403.22§422.7§422D.1§423.2§423.2A§423.43§423.5§423F.2§423F.6§427.1§428A.7§437A.15§441.21§441.33§541B.4§627.6§633.108§633.555§633.678§633.681
Cites§15.332
Lobbying
4 for · 1 against · 38 undecided · Who →
Family tree
Study bill
91st General Assembly