Display
Language
About accessibility
Language
Display
Sign in

Bills › 91st General Assembly

Relating to nuisance actions against sports or exposition venues

Sponsored by Rep. Brooke Boden (R)

Topics:Courts & civil lawCities & counties

Same legislation: SF 279, HF 645, SF 495

Write your legislators about it

Also covers SF 279 and HF 645 and SF 495.

What changed before it passed
Official bill pageLobbyist declarationsOne-pager to print

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedFebruary 6, 2025
  2. Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 6, 2025
  3. Done: House committeeFebruary 25, 2025
  4. Skipped: Passes the HouseContinued as HF 645
  5. Next: Senate committee
  6. Next: Passes the Senate
  7. Next: To the Governor
  8. Next: Signed into law

Became HF 645 → Its progress continues under the new number. Go to HF 645 What’s a funnel?

What changed before it passed The bill as introduced compared with the version both chambers passed.

Amendments · 2

2 adopted · 0 failed. Newest first.

  • S-3061Strike everything · filed March 31, 2025 by Sen. Cherielynn Westrich (R)
    AI summary This amendment replaces the entire bill to focus specifically on racing facilities and racetracks instead of sports or exposition venues. It would prevent property owners from suing a racetrack for nuisance if the track was already there before the owner bought their property or built in the area. Its wording →
    Adopted
    April 14, 2025
  • H-1204Strike everything · filed March 26, 2025 by
    AI summary This amendment replaces the entire bill to focus specifically on racing facilities and racetracks rather than all sports and exhibition venues. It would prevent property owners from suing a racing facility or racetrack for nuisance or other claims if the facility was already there before the owner bought their property or moved into the area. Its wording →
    Adopted
    March 27, 2025