Bills › 91st General Assembly
Relating to facial coverings worn by peace officers and providing penalties
Sponsored by Rep. Jerome Amos Jr. (D), Rep. Ken Croken (D), Rep. Monica Kurth (D), Rep. Mary Lee Madison (D), Rep. Angel Ramirez (D)
Where it is now
- Done: IntroducedJanuary 30, 2026
- Stopped: SubcommitteeDied when the General Assembly ended
- Next: House committeeFunnel: by February 20, 2026
- Next: Passes the House
- Next: Senate committeeFunnel: by March 20, 2026
- Next: Passes the Senate
- Next: To the Governor
- Next: Signed into law
Died when the session ended The 2026 session adjourned on May 3, 2026, the General Assembly’s last regular session. Bills that didn’t pass both chambers died. What’s a funnel?
What’s in it
AI summary Police officers would be prohibited from wearing masks or headgear that hide their faces while doing their jobs. If an officer breaks this rule and commits certain crimes like assault or false arrest, they can be held personally responsible for damages in a lawsuit. Violating this law is also considered a serious misdemeanor that can lead to jail time and fines.1
Read the official explanation
This bill relates to facial coverings worn by peace officers. The bill provides that a peace officer shall not wear a facial covering in the performance of the officer’s duties. A “facial covering” is defined as any opaque mask, garment, helmet, headgear, or other item that conceals or obscures the facial identity of an individual including but not limited to a balaclava, tactical mask, gator, ski mask, and any similar type of facial covering or face-shielding item. The bill lists items not considered to be a “facial covering”. A person who violates the bill is guilty of a serious misdemeanor. A serious misdemeanor is punishable by confinement for no more than one year and a fine of at least $430 but not more than $2,560. The bill provides that a peace officer who is found to have committed an assault, battery, false imprisonment, false arrest, abuse of process, or malicious prosecution, while wearing a facial covering in a knowing and willful violation of the bill, is not entitled to assert any privilege or immunity for the officer’s tortious conduct against a claim of civil liability, and shall be liable to the injured individual for actual damages or statutory damages of not less than $10,000, whichever is greater.
Similar bills
- SF 2108 Relating to facial coverings worn by peace officers and providing penalties91st General Assembly · In committeeNearly identical
Matched by wording or an identical title.