Bills › 91st General Assembly

HF 2228Withdrawn · SF 2214 became law instead · March 2, 2026

Relating to the installation of transmission lines on highway rights-of-way

Sponsored by the House Commerce Committee, Rep. Shannon Latham (R), Rep. Devon Wood (R)

Topics:Energy & utilitiesTransportation

Same legislation: HF 736, SSB 3063, SF 2214

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedMarch 5, 2025
  2. Done: SubcommitteeJanuary 12, 2026
  3. Done: House committeeJanuary 28, 2026
  4. Done: Passes the HouseMarch 2, 202690–0
  5. Skipped: Senate committeeSkipped
  6. Done: Passes the SenateFebruary 24, 202646–1
  7. Done: To the GovernorApril 9, 2026
  8. Done: Signed into lawApril 9, 2026

SF 2214 became law → The same legislation passed as SF 2214, so this version was set aside. Go to SF 2214 What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

AI summary If a utility company asks in writing, the Department of Transportation must work with them to find places to put power lines along highways. The state would allow these long transmission lines to be installed along primary roads unless they would be unsafe or get in the way of traffic. If the Department of Transportation says no to a request, they must tell the public why.1

Read the official explanation

This bill relates to the installation of transmission lines on highway rights-of-way. Under current law, the general assembly encourages proactive coordination between the department of transportation (DOT), local governments, utility companies, and other affected parties to minimize costs and avoid relocating utilities during highway construction. Affected parties are invited to participate in development meetings. However, failure to participate during the design phase does not prevent a construction project from moving forward. The bill requires the DOT, upon written request by a utility infrastructure owner, to engage in coordination activities with a utility or transmission line developer to review highway corridors identified in the request for potential locations to place transmission lines. The DOT must share all known plans with affected utility or transmission line developers on planned future projects in the highway corridor if the planned highway project impacts the placement or siting of transmission lines. Under current law, the DOT is required to adopt administrative rules embodying a utility accommodation policy imposing reasonable restrictions on utility line placements on primary road rights-of-way. The bill authorizes longitudinal transmission line installations to be installed on a primary road right-of-way, upon written request by a utility infrastructure owner, unless the DOT determines such an installation would endanger public safety or interfere with the proper function and use of the highway. The DOT must make the reasons for denying the installation of a longitudinal transmission line available to the public within days.

Why it matters. The Iowa Department of Transportation and utility companies would be required to coordinate more closely when planning the placement of transmission lines along highway corridors. Utility infrastructure owners can request that the Department of Transportation review specific highway areas for potential transmission line locations and share information about future highway projects that might affect them. Utility companies may install longitudinal transmission lines on primary road rights-of-way unless the Department of Transportation determines the installation would interfere with highway use or endanger public safety.2

Changed since by amendment H-8056; see Amendments.

Full bill text · What changed before it passed3

Iowa Code it changes

Amends§306.47§306A.3

How the Code works4

Lobbying

14 for · 0 against · 24 undecided · Who →

Family tree