Bills › 91st General Assembly
Relating to the prescribing, ordering, dispensing, and administering authority of pharmacists and practitioners
Sponsored by Rep. Cindy Golding (R)
Where it is now
- Done: IntroducedJanuary 29, 2026
- Stopped: SubcommitteeDied when the General Assembly ended
- Next: House committeeFunnel: by February 20, 2026
- Next: Passes the House
- Next: Senate committeeFunnel: by March 20, 2026
- Next: Passes the Senate
- Next: To the Governor
- Next: Signed into law
Died when the session ended The 2026 session adjourned on May 3, 2026, the General Assembly’s last regular session. Bills that didn’t pass both chambers died. What’s a funnel?
What’s in it
AI summary Employers and licensing boards cannot stop pharmacists or medical practitioners from using their professional judgment when prescribing or giving treatments. These rules protect healthcare workers from being punished or disciplined for making medical decisions that follow the law. Any employer rules that try to limit this professional judgment will not be allowed.1
Read the official explanation
This bill relates to the prescribing, ordering, dispensing, and administering authority of practitioners and pharmacists. The bill prohibits the board of pharmacy and any health-related professional board under Code chapter 147 (general provisions, health-related professions) (boards) that license a pharmacist or practitioner and any employer of a pharmacist or practitioner from restricting the prescribing, ordering, dispensing, or administering authority of a pharmacist or practitioner, consistent with the pharmacist’s or practitioner’s scope of practice as restricted by law, in a way that acts as a deterrent for the pharmacist or practitioner to use a medication or treatment in accordance with the pharmacist’s or practitioner’s best professional judgment. The bill also provides that any restriction by an employer of a pharmacist or practitioner that is prohibited under the bill, whether or not documented by the employer as part of a contract, agreement, or employee handbook, by an amendment to any such document, or by any other means, is unenforceable and shall not be the basis for any disciplinary action by the employer. The bill also provides that a pharmacist or practitioner who uses a medication or treatment in accordance with the pharmacist’s or practitioner’s best professional judgment and consistent with the pharmacist’s or practitioner’s scope of practice, as restricted by law, under the bill, shall not be subject to licensee discipline.3 defines “pharmacist” as a person licensed by the board of pharmacy to practice pharmacy; and “practitioner” as a physician, dentist, podiatric physician, prescribing psychologist, veterinarian, optometrist, physician assistant, advanced registered nurse practitioner, or other person licensed or registered to prescribe, distribute, or dispense a prescription drug or device in the course of professional practice in this state or a person licensed by another state in a health field in which, under Iowa law, licensees in this state may legally prescribe drugs.
Family tree
Tried before
91st General Assembly
Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.
Tried before
This idea has been filed in an earlier General Assembly. None got through a chamber.
- SF 2122 Relating to the prescribing, ordering, dispensing, and administering authority of pharmaci…90th General Assembly · Subcommittee recommends passage · nearly identicalCleared committee
Similar bills this General Assembly
- SF 313 Relating to the prescribing, ordering, dispensing, and administering authority of pharmaci…91st General Assembly · Approved by committeeNearly identical
Matched by wording or an identical title.