Proyectos de ley › 91.ª Asamblea General

HF 2123Murió al terminar la sesión · 10 de febrero de 2026

Relating to state entities, including by modifying provisions related to prohibited diversity, equity, and inclusion offices and officers and to trainings and curricula regarding specific defined concepts provided by school districts

Presentado por Rep. Samantha Fett (R)

Temas:K–12 educationState governmentDiversity, equity & inclusion

Dónde está ahora

  1. Hecho: Presentado21 de enero de 2026
  2. Hecho: Subcomité21 de enero de 2026
  3. Se detuvo: Comité de la CámaraMurió al terminar la Asamblea General
  4. Sigue: Lo aprueba la Cámara
  5. Sigue: Comité del SenadoEmbudo: antes del 20 de marzo de 2026
  6. Sigue: Lo aprueba el Senado
  7. Sigue: A gobernador(a)
  8. Sigue: Firmado como ley

Murió al terminar la sesión La sesión de 2026 terminó el 3 de mayo de 2026, la última sesión ordinaria de la Asamblea General. Los proyectos que no pasaron por ambas cámaras murieron. ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?

Qué contiene

Resumen con IA State agencies and school districts are already prohibited from having diversity, equity, and inclusion offices or staff. If a court finds that an agency or school district violated these rules, the person responsible and their supervisor must be fired. This law also requires that any professional licenses held by those employees be taken away and sets fines for the organizations that broke the rules. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1

Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)

This bill relates to state entities, including by modifying provisions related to prohibited diversity, equity, and inclusion offices and officers and to trainings and curricula regarding specific defined concepts by school districts.2 prohibits state entities from expending any moneys appropriated by the general assembly, or any other moneys, to establish, sustain, support, or staff a diversity, equity, and inclusion office, or to contract, employ, engage, or hire an individual to serve as a diversity, equity, and inclusion officer. 3 authorizes the attorney general to bring an action against a state entity for a writ of mandamus to compel the state entity to comply with these prohibitions.3 authorizes a student or alumnus of a public school, or an employee of a state entity, alleging a violation of the bill’s provisions to bring a civil action for injunctive relief against the state entity to prohibit the state entity from continuing such violation.3 is the prevailing party, the state entity is required to terminate the employment of the person who committed the violation. The bill also provides that if the supervisor of the person who committed the violation was aware of the violation and failed to take actions intended to prevent the violation, then the state entity is required to terminate the employment of the supervisor as well. Additionally, if the position of the person whose employment was terminated required a license, certificate, authorization, or statement of recognition, the person’s license, certificate, authorization, or statement of recognition shall be revoked by the entity that originally issued the license, certificate, authorization, or statement of recognition.3 is the prevailing party, the bill establishes levels of civil penalties to be imposed upon the state entity that are based on the amount of the state entity’s total budget.74(2) requires the superintendent of each school district to ensure that any curriculum or mandatory staff or student training provided by an employee of the school district or by a contractor hired by the school district does not teach, advocate, encourage, promote, or act upon specific stereotyping and scapegoating toward others on the basis of demographic group membership or identity.74(3) requires school district diversity and inclusion efforts to discourage students from discriminating against another by political ideology or any characteristic protected under federal law or applicable state law.74(3) also requires school districts to prohibit employees from discriminating against students or other employees by political ideology or any characteristic protected under federal law or applicable state law.74. The bill also authorizes a student or alumnus of a school district, or an employee of a school district, alleging a violation of the bill’s provisions to bring a civil action for injunctive relief against the school district to prohibit the school district from continuing such violation. The bill establishes the venue in which such actions may be brought. If the attorney general or other person is the prevailing party, the school district is required to terminate the employment of the person who committed the violation. The bill also provides that if the supervisor of the person who committed the violation was aware of the violation and failed to take actions intended to prevent the violation, then the school district is required to terminate the employment of the supervisor as well. Additionally, if the position of the person whose employment was terminated required a license, certificate, authorization, or statement of recognition, the person’s license, certificate, authorization, or statement of recognition shall be revoked by the entity that originally issued the license, certificate, authorization, or statement of recognition, which includes the board of educational examiners. If the attorney general or other person bringing an action is the prevailing party, the bill establishes levels of civil penalties to be imposed upon the school district that are based on the amount of the school district’s total budget. The bill makes conforming changes.

Por qué importa. State entities and school districts would face new requirements regarding diversity, equity, and inclusion offices, staff, and training. If a person or supervisor is found to have violated these rules through a successful legal action, the entity must terminate their employment and may revoke any required professional licenses. Prevailing parties in these legal actions could also trigger civil penalties for the state entity or school district based on their total budget. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)2

Texto completo del proyecto (en inglés)3

House subcommittee

Named January 21, 2026. On February 10, 2026 it recommended passage.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

17 comentarios públicos por escrito a su subcomité: 9 de febrero de 2026 (10), 3 de febrero de 2026 (7) · en el sitio de la Legislatura

Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)

Crea§272C.10A§279.74A§602.1012§602.3203A

Modifica§19.3§256.146§279.74

Cómo funciona el Código4

Cabildeo

7 a favor · 17 en contra · 2 indecisos · Quiénes →

Similar bills

  • SF 2072 Relating to state entities, including by modifying provisions related to prohibited divers…
    91st General Assembly · In committee
    Nearly identical

Matched by wording or an identical title.