Proyectos de ley › 91.ª Asamblea General

HF 1051Murió al terminar la sesión · 13 de mayo de 2025

Authorizing cities to establish self-supported tourism improvement districts

Presentado por el comité Ways and Means (successor To Hf 38) de la Cámara, Rep. Brian K. Lohse (R)

Temas:Business & economyCities & countiesTaxes

La misma legislación: HF 38, HF 760

Dónde está ahora

  1. Hecho: Presentado14 de enero de 2025
  2. Hecho: Subcomité15 de enero de 2025
  3. Hecho: Comité de la Cámara11 de febrero de 2025
  4. Se detuvo: Lo aprueba la CámaraMurió al terminar la Asamblea General
  5. Sigue: Comité del SenadoEmbudo: antes del 20 de marzo de 2026
  6. Sigue: Lo aprueba el Senado
  7. Sigue: A gobernador(a)
  8. Sigue: Firmado como ley

Murió al terminar la sesión La sesión de 2026 terminó el 3 de mayo de 2026, la última sesión ordinaria de la Asamblea General. Los proyectos que no pasaron por ambas cámaras murieron. ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?

Qué contiene

Resumen con IA Local governments can create special tourism districts that charge lodging businesses a fee to help pay for local events, marketing, and improvements. These businesses pay based on how much they benefit from the district's activities. Business owners have the right to protest the plan or object to the fees through a specific process. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1

Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)

This bill authorizes a self-supported tourism improvement district (district). The bill allows a levy (assessment) upon lodging businesses for the purpose of acquiring, constructing, installing, or maintaining improvements and providing activities that will provide certain benefits to lodging businesses located within the district. The bill defines “activities” to include promotion of public events, promotion of tourism within the district, promotion of business activities, marketing, workforce development, and other related services. The district is created by action of the local governing body where the district is located. The bill establishes specific criteria including a map of the area that would comprise the district, the rate and structure of the assessment, and the expiration of the district. The assessments shall be assessed on the basis of the estimated benefit to the lodging business within the district. A protest of a district plan may be made by any interested person, and the bill specifies procedures for when a protest is made by a person. If the lodging business owners or their authorized representatives within the proposed district that collectively represent more than percent or more of the assessments to be paid file a written objection, the bill establishes procedures for when such an objection is made. The bill allows a local governing body to modify the district, and establishes procedures for renewal of a district set to expire. The bill allows a local governing body to issue bonds by resolution to finance the estimated costs of the proposed improvements in the district. The bill requires the authorized representative of the district to file an annual report with the governing body establishing the district. The local governing body may repeal the existence of the district based upon law violations or malfeasance, if no indebtedness exists, and proper notification has been provided.

Por qué importa. Local governments could create tourism improvement districts that allow lodging businesses to be assessed a fee to fund marketing, public events, and workforce development. These businesses would pay assessments based on their estimated benefit to the district, which can be used to acquire, build, or maintain local improvements. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)2

Texto completo del proyecto (en inglés)3

1 comentario público por escrito a su subcomité: 8 de mayo de 2025 (1) · en el sitio de la Legislatura

Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)

Crea§358D.1§358D.2§358D.3§358D.4§358D.5§358D.6§358D.7§358D.8§358D.9

Cómo funciona el Código4

Cabildeo

10 a favor · 0 en contra · 21 indecisos · Quiénes →

Family tree

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.

Tried before

This idea has been filed in an earlier General Assembly. None got through a chamber.

  • HF 42 Authorizing cities to establish self-supported entertainment areas
    90th General Assembly · Renumbered as HF 412 · nearly identical
    Cleared committee

Similar bills this General Assembly

  • HSB 734 Authorizing cities to establish self-supported tourism improvement districts
    91st General Assembly · Subcommittee recommends passage
    Nearly identical

Matched by wording or an identical title.