Bills › 91st General Assembly
Relating to and making appropriations to the judicial branch, including judicial officer salaries and interpreter or translator fees, and including effective date provisions
Sponsored by the House Appropriations Committee
Where it is now
- Done: IntroducedApril 30, 2025
- Done: SubcommitteeApril 30, 2025
- Done: House committeeMay 12, 2025
- Done: Passes the HouseMay 14, 202586–1
- Skipped: Senate committeeSkipped
- Done: Passes the SenateMay 13, 202534–14
- Done: To the GovernorMay 23, 2025
- Done: Signed into lawJune 11, 2025
SF 648 became law → The same legislation passed as SF 648, so this version was set aside. Go to SF 648 What’s a funnel?
What’s in it
AI summary This bill provides money to the Iowa judicial branch to pay for things like salaries, equipment, and child support services. It allows trials to be moved to a neighboring county if everyone involved agrees, and it lets judges use electronic communication instead of traveling for work. Additionally, the bill sets the pay for justices and judges and changes how fees for interpreters and translators are handled.1
Read the official explanation
This bill relates to and makes appropriations to the judicial branch. FY 2025-2026 APPROPRIATIONS.1302(3) for certain purposes, payment of court-ordered juvenile services, and juvenile delinquent graduated sanctions services. The bill provides that a civil trial including a jury trial may take place in a county contiguous to the county with proper jurisdiction, even if the contiguous county is located in an adjacent judicial district or judicial election district, if all the parties in a case agree. If a trial is moved to another county that is located in another judicial district or judicial election district, the judicial officers serving the judicial district or judicial election district receiving the case shall preside over the case. The bill permits a judicial officer to waive travel reimbursement for any travel outside the judicial officer’s county of residence to conduct official business. The bill allows a judicial officer to be placed on unpaid leave on any day a court employee is required to furlough. The bill provides that if a judicial officer is placed on unpaid leave, the salary of the judicial officer shall be reduced accordingly for the pay period in which the unpaid leave occurred. The bill provides that the judicial branch may use an amount equal to the aggregate amount of the salary reductions due to judicial officer unpaid leave for any purpose other than judicial salaries. The bill states legislative intent that the judicial branch utilize the Iowa communications network or other secure electronic communications in lieu of traveling. The bill sets forth salaries for justices, judges, and magistrates. This provision takes effect June 20, 2025. INTERPRETER OR TRANSLATOR FEES.1302. The bill prohibits the department of revenue court debt collection fee from including interpreter or translator fees. The bill also prohibits the county attorney from collecting court debt from interpreter or translator fees.
Why it matters. The judicial branch would receive state funding for salaries, child support processing, and juvenile services for fiscal years 2025-2026. Parties in a civil case could agree to hold their trial in a neighboring county, and judicial officers may be placed on unpaid leave or waive travel reimbursements. Additionally, the bill changes how interpreter and translator fees are handled regarding state reimbursements and debt collection.2
Changed since by amendment S-3156; see Amendments.
House subcommittee
Named April 30, 2025 (as HSB 340). Meeting: Thursday, May 1 · 2:30 PM · RM 102.
- Rep. Brian K. Lohse REmail
- Rep. Ken Croken DEmail
- Rep. Zach Dieken REmail
- Rep. Cindy Golding REmail
- Rep. Judd Lawler REmail
- Rep. Mary Lee Madison DEmail
- Rep. Mark I. Thompson REmail
- Rep. Mike Vondran REmail
- Rep. Ross Wilburn DEmail
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Iowa Code it changes
Lobbying
6 for · 0 against · 20 undecided · Who →
Family tree
Tried before
Study bill
91st General Assembly
Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.
Tried before
This idea has been filed in 3 earlier General Assemblies. A version became law.
- SSB 1215 SSB 121590th General Assembly · Renumbered as SF 563 · nearly identicalCleared committee
- HF 2695 Relating to and making appropriations to the judicial branch, and including effective date…90th General Assembly · Withdrawn · nearly identicalDidn’t advance
- SSB 3190 SSB 319090th General Assembly · In committee · nearly identicalCleared committee
- SSB 1245 SSB 124589th General Assembly · In committee · nearly identicalCleared committee
- SSB 3153 SSB 315389th General Assembly · In committee · very similarCleared committee
- HF 2558 Relating to appropriations to the judicial branch89th General Assembly · Signed with item vetoes · very similarBecame law
- HF 864 Relating to appropriations to the judicial branch89th General Assembly · Signed by Governor · similarBecame law
- SSB 3104 SSB 310488th General Assembly · In committee · very similarCleared committee
- SF 616 Relating to appropriations to the judicial branch. Effective 7-1-1988th General Assembly · Signed by Governor · similarBecame law
- SSB 1142 SSB 114288th General Assembly · Introduced · similarDidn’t advance
Similar bills this General Assembly
- SSB 1225 Relating to and making appropriations to the judicial branch91st General Assembly · In committeeNearly identical
- HF 2769 Relating to and making appropriations to the judicial branch91st General Assembly · Signed by GovernorNearly identical
Matched by wording or an identical title.