Bills › 90th General Assembly
Where it is now
- Done: IntroducedFebruary 7, 2024
- Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 7, 2024
- Done: Senate committeeFebruary 15, 2024
- Skipped: Passes the SenateContinued as SF 2391
- Next: House committee
- Next: Passes the House
- Next: To the Governor
- Next: Signed into law
Became SF 2391 → Its progress continues under the new number. Go to SF 2391 What’s a funnel?
What’s in it
AI summary Food manufacturers and grocery stores would be prohibited from using labels that mislead customers about meat alternatives made from plants, insects, or lab-grown cells. These products must clearly state they are made from these sources rather than using names like "steak" or "wing" that imply the food came from a slaughtered animal. If a business intentionally breaks these labeling rules, they could face fines or lose their license.1
Read the official explanation
GENERAL. This bill prohibits the misbranding of certain food products that are manufactured to resemble meat products that are not derived from the processing (slaughter) of certain domesticated agricultural food animals (animals), including cattle and bison, goats, sheep and lambs, swine, chickens, and turkeys. A manufactured meat product is formulated as a cultivated-meat product, or either an insect-meat product or plant-meat product. In all three cases, the food product has one or more sensory attributes that resemble a type of tissue originating from a species of food animal but that, in lieu of being derived from slaughter, is derived from manufacturing cells grown in vitro, meaning outside the food animal’s body, or is derived from manufacturing parts of insects or plants (new Code chapter 137E). 3). Both government entities are referred to as a regulatory authority. A food processing plant manufactures, packages, labels, or stores food for human consumption but does not provide a food product directly to a consumer. A food establishment stores, prepares, packages, or provides a food product for human consumption.1).1). A regulatory authority licenses and inspects both businesses for health and safety purposes. LABELING REQUIREMENT.4). MISBRANDED FOOD PRODUCTS. The bill provides that a food product is misbranded under two circumstances. In both cases, the food item contains a percentage of a manufactured meat product, excluding insects or plants considered foreign material, and the container’s label does not adequately describe the manufactured meat product.6). The second circumstance of misbranding occurs if the label fails to notify the purchaser that the food product contains a manufactured meat product.7).7). INSPECTIONS AND ENFORCEMENT. The bill provides that a regulatory authority must inspect a food processing plant or grocery store to determine compliance with the bill’s provisions under new Code chapter 137E in the same manner as it inspects those businesses for health and safety purposes under amended Code chapter 137F.7A). CRIMINAL OFFENSE. A person who willfully misbrands a food product in violation of the bill’s provisions commits a simple misdemeanor. A simple misdemeanor is punishable by confinement for no more than days and a fine of at least $105 but not more than $855.
Changed since by amendments H-8273, H-8236, S-5023; see Amendments.
Senate subcommittee
Named February 7, 2024. On February 12, 2024 it recommended amendment and passage. [].
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Fiscal note
AI summary This bill regulates how fabricated or cultivated food products are labeled and purchased by Iowa educational institutions. The Department of Inspections, Appeals, and Licensing will need approximately $10,000 for information technology costs to modify its electronic systems, which will be funded by existing license fee revenue. The total fiscal impact to the Department of Inspections, Appeals, and Licensing cannot be estimated at this time.3
Read the fiscal note
Description
Senate File 2391 establishes regulations regarding fabricated or cultivated food items misbranded as egg or meat products, as well as the purchase and availability cultivated-protein food products in the following ways:
- Restricts the sale of food products misbranded as egg or meat products.
- Regulates the purchase of cultivated-protein food products and fabricated-egg products by Iowa educational institutions.
- Requires the HHS to request a waiver or other exception to exclude the purchase of cultivated-protein food products and fabricated-egg products from eligibility under the federal nutrition program in the State.
- Requires the Department of Inspections, Appeals, and Licensing (DIAL), as the regulatory authority, to inspect a food processing plant or grocery store for compliance based on a credible complaint that food products are misbranded as meat.
- Allows a regulatory authority, the Attorney General, or the county attorney in the county where the food product is being offered to issue a stop order or an embargo order.
- Establishes relevant definitions, including but not limited to “cultivated-protein food product,” “identifying meat term,” “insect-protein food product,” “fabricated-egg product,” and “identifying egg term.”
Assumptions
Information technology costs for DIAL to modify the existing electronic inspection report and complaint system are estimated to be approximately $10,000 and will be funded by existing license fee revenue.
Fiscal Impact
The fiscal impact to DIAL cannot be estimated at this time.
Sources
- Department of Inspections, Appeals, and Licensing
- Health and Human Services
- Board of Regents
- Legislative Services Agency
- Final Fiscal Note — Imitation Meat Products, Advertising Requirements · May 14, 2024
- Imitation Meat Products, Advertising Requirements · February 26, 2024
Iowa Code it changes
Creates§137E.1§137E.2§137E.3§137E.4§137E.5§137E.6§137E.7§137E.8§137F.7A
Lobbying
7 for · 1 against · 15 undecided · Who →
Family tree
Study bill
90th General Assembly