Proyectos de ley › 90.ª Asamblea General
SSB 3053
Temas:State government
Dónde está ahora
- Hecho: Presentado16 de enero de 2024
- Hecho: Subcomité16 de enero de 2024
- Hecho: Comité del Senado31 de enero de 2024
- Se saltó: Lo aprueba el SenadoSigue como SF 2194
- Sigue: Comité de la Cámara
- Sigue: Lo aprueba la Cámara
- Sigue: A gobernador(a)
- Sigue: Firmado como ley
Ahora es SF 2194 → Sigue avanzando con el número nuevo. Ir a SF 2194 ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?
Qué contiene
Resumen con IA State leaders currently have to compare the cost of renting private office space against using public buildings before they renovate or move state agencies. This change would mean they no longer have to do this comparison if they are using buildings already owned by the state or located in the capitol complex. It also gives officials the choice of whether or not to look for private rental options instead of making it a requirement. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1
Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)
Current law requires that, prior to replacing or renovating publicly owned buildings or relocating any state agencies in Des Moines within publicly owned buildings, the director of the department of administrative services issue a request for proposals for leasing privately owned office space and use such proposals to compare costs of the public and private spaces. This bill excludes existing space within capitol complex buildings and buildings owned by the state from the term “publicly owned building” for purposes of this process. The bill also makes the decision to issue or use a request for proposals discretionary. _____ circumstances and excluding the department of public defense and the armory board from this process.
Senate subcommittee
Named January 16, 2024. On January 24, 2024 it recommended passage. [].
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)
Modifica§8A.321
Cabildeo
1 a favor · 0 en contra · 0 indecisos · Quiénes →
Family tree
Study bill
90th General Assembly