Proyectos de ley › 90.ª Asamblea General
Dónde está ahora
- Hecho: Presentado10 de enero de 2024
- Hecho: Subcomité10 de enero de 2024
- Hecho: Comité del Senado7 de febrero de 2024
- Se saltó: Lo aprueba el SenadoSigue como SF 2286
- Sigue: Comité de la Cámara
- Sigue: Lo aprueba la Cámara
- Sigue: A gobernador(a)
- Sigue: Firmado como ley
Ahora es SF 2286 → Sigue avanzando con el número nuevo. Ir a SF 2286 ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?
Qué contiene
Resumen con IA Medical practitioners, health care institutions, and insurance companies can refuse to participate in or pay for certain medical services that go against their personal beliefs. These groups and individuals are protected from being sued or discriminated against for making these choices. The law also protects whistleblowers who report violations and prevents medical boards from punishing doctors for their protected free speech. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1
Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)
This bill relates to protections for health care institutions, health care payors, and medical practitioners involving a right of conscience, whistleblower activities, and free speech. The bill provides definitions used in the bill including for “conscience”, “health care institution”, “health care payor”, “health care service”, and “medical practitioner”. The bill provides that a health care institution or health care payor shall not be required to participate in or pay for a health care service that violates the health care institution’s or health care payor’s conscience. A health care payor shall list any health care service the health care payor refuses to pay for on the basis of their conscience in the health care payor’s policies, plans, contracts, or other agreements. A health care institution or health care payor that refuses to participate in or pay for a health care service is immune from liability for damages allegedly arising from the refusal, and such refusal shall not be the basis for any discrimination against the health care institution or health care payor. The bill also provides that a medical practitioner has the right not to participate in a health care service that violates the medical practitioner’s conscience. A health care institution may require a medical practitioner who is employed, contracted, or granted admitting privileges by the health care institution and who is seeking to exercise their conscience by not participating in a health care service, to submit to the health care institution a written refusal signed by the medical practitioner. A health care institution is immune from liability for the exercise of conscience not to participate in a health care service by a medical practitioner. _____ practitioner who refuses to participate in a health care service due to exercise of conscience is immune from liability for damages allegedly arising from the refusal, and such refusal shall not be the basis for any discrimination against the medical practitioner. These provisions are not to be construed to relieve a health care institution of the requirement under federal law to provide emergency medical services to all patients. The immunity provisions do not apply to a health care institution or health care payor owned or operated by the state or a political subdivision of the state. The bill provides that a medical practitioner’s, health care institution’s, or health care payor’s exercise of conscience not to participate in a health care service shall not be grounds for loss of any privileges, immunities, or public benefits under state law. The bill provides whistleblower protections by providing that a medical practitioner or health care institution shall not be discriminated against because the medical practitioner or health care institution: provides, causes to be provided, or intends to provide or cause to be provided information relating to a suspected violation of the bill to the medical practitioner or health care institution’s employer or various other entities specified in the bill; testifies or intends to testify in a proceeding concerning a violation of the bill; or assists or participates, or intends to assist or participate, in a proceeding under the bill. _____ may put patient health at risk, or a substantial and specific danger to public health or safety. These provisions are not to be construed to exempt a person from the requirements of the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. The bill also provides that the department of health and human services (HHS), a health professional licensing board, or any other licensing or certifying entity of a medical practitioner shall not reprimand, sanction, or revoke or threaten to revoke a license or certification of a medical practitioner for engaging in speech or expressive activity protected under the first amendment to the Constitution of the United States, unless HHS, a licensing board, or other licensing or certifying entity demonstrates beyond a reasonable doubt that the medical practitioner’s speech was the direct cause of physical harm to a person with whom the medical practitioner had a medical practitioner-patient relationship within the three years immediately preceding the incident of physical harm. Within days of receiving a complaint alleging a medical practitioner’s speech was the direct cause of physical harm to a person with whom the medical practitioner had a medical practitioner-patient relationship that may result in revocation of a medical practitioner’s license, HHS, a licensing board, or other licensing or certifying entity shall provide the medical practitioner with a copy of the complaint. If HHS, a licensing board, or other licensing or certifying entity fails to provide the complaint within days of receipt, HHS, the licensing board, or other certifying entity shall pay the medical practitioner an administrative penalty of $500 for each week of noncompliance. The bill provides that it is unlawful for a person to interfere or attempt to interfere with the exercise of conscience not to participate in a health care service or the whistleblower or free speech rights and protections authorized under the bill. _____ under the bill is entitled to bring a civil action that, if successful, may result in injunctive relief, monetary damages for injuries suffered, and reasonable costs and attorney fees. The provisions of the bill shall not be construed as modifying or limiting the rights and remedies provided under Code chapter 146 (abortions —— refusal to perform). The bill also amends Code chapter 146 to provide that an individual shall not be scheduled, assigned, or requested to directly or indirectly perform, facilitate, refer for, or otherwise participate in an abortion unless the individual first affirmatively consents in writing to perform, facilitate, refer for, or otherwise participate in the abortion. The bill applies to a health care payor policy, contract, plan, or other agreement delivered, issued for delivery, continued, or renewed in the state on or after January 1, 2025.
Senate subcommittee
Named January 10, 2024. On January 24, 2024 it recommended amendment and passage. [].
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
1 comentario público por escrito a su subcomité: 24 de enero de 2024 (1) · en el sitio de la Legislatura
Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)
Crea§135S.1§135S.2§135S.3§135S.4§135S.5§135S.6§135S.7
Modifica§146.1
Cabildeo
9 a favor · 18 en contra · 17 indecisos · Quiénes →
Family tree
Study bill
90th General Assembly