Proyectos de ley › 90.ª Asamblea General
SSB 1118
Dónde está ahora
- Hecho: Presentado1 de febrero de 2023
- Hecho: Subcomité2 de febrero de 2023
- Se detuvo: Comité del SenadoMurió al terminar la Asamblea General
- Sigue: Lo aprueba el Senado
- Se saltó: Comité de la CámaraSe saltó
- Hecho: Lo aprueba la Cámara22 de marzo de 202395–0
- Sigue: A gobernador(a)
- Sigue: Firmado como ley
Murió al terminar la sesión La sesión de 2024 terminó el 19 de abril de 2024, la última sesión ordinaria de la Asamblea General. Los proyectos que no pasaron por ambas cámaras murieron. ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?
Qué contiene
Resumen con IA This law would allow people involved in eviction cases to have their court records hidden from the public under certain conditions. If a person is found not guilty or the case is dismissed, the court must seal the records within three days. People who were found guilty for not paying rent can also ask to seal their records if five years have passed and they have followed specific rules. Once a record is sealed, consumer reporting agencies cannot use that information in a person's credit report. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1
Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)
This bill relates to sealing court records of residential forcible entry and detainer actions (eviction actions). The bill requires a court to seal the court records of an eviction action not later than three days from the date of the hearing if any of the following have occurred: the defendant is found not guilty, the court finds there is no genuine issue of material fact between the parties, the case is dismissed, or the plaintiff does not appear for the hearing. The bill provides that upon application of a defendant found guilty in an eviction action for nonpayment of rent, the court shall seal the court records if more than five years have passed since disposition, the applicant has not been found guilty in a subsequent eviction action in the five-year period preceding the application, the applicant within the last years has not been granted a sealing of eviction court records, and the applicant has paid all costs. The application to seal shall be included in the sealed court records. The bill provides that upon sealing the court records, all filings, documentation, and writs of association shall be removed from any publicly accessible location. _____ records shall not be available for public inspection except upon request by the defendant or the attorney for the defendant by filing a motion in the sealed case or application to the judicial branch using a form to be prescribed by the supreme court for scholarly, educational, journalistic, or governmental purposes. The bill requires the clerk of court in the county in which an action is originated to maintain a record in the aggregate of all filings and to make such information available to the public in such a manner prescribed by the supreme court as to protect the identity of the parties while still providing the public with information relating to eviction actions in the county. The bill provides that upon sealing a consumer reporting agency shall not disclose the existence of, or information regarding, an eviction action or other civil action sealed or made confidential under the bill or use such action as a factor to determine any score or recommendation to be included in a consumer report regarding any person named in such case. Under the bill, certain provisions do not apply to an application to seal a record for an eviction action by a defendant found guilty when a money judgment has been awarded to the plaintiff.
Cambiado después por la enmienda H-1144; vea Enmiendas.
Senate subcommittee
Named February 2, 2023. On February 22, 2023 it recommended passage. [].
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
7 comentarios públicos por escrito a su subcomité: 28 de marzo de 2023 (1), 22 de febrero de 2023 (1), 26 de enero de 2023 (3), 25 de enero de 2023 (2) · en el sitio de la Legislatura
Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)
Modifica§648.22
Cabildeo
22 a favor · 2 en contra · 12 indecisos · Quiénes →
Family tree
Tried before
90th General Assembly
Picked up later
Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.
Tried before
This idea has been filed in an earlier General Assembly. None became law, though one got through a chamber.
- HF 820 Relating to court records for residential forcible entry and detainer actions89th General Assembly · Passed House · very similarPassed a chamber
Similar bills this General Assembly
- HSB 117 Relating to court records for residential forcible entry and detainer actions and includin…91st General Assembly · Subcommittee recommends passageVery similar
Matched by wording or an identical title.