Proyectos de ley › 90.ª Asamblea General

SF 525Murió al terminar la sesión · 22 de marzo de 2023

Relating to criminal law including the disclosure of a defendant’s privileged records, no-contact orders, commencement limitations for certain sexual offenses, sexually predatory offenses, victim rights, discovery, postconviction relief actions, criminal appeals, and pretrial bond amounts for certain felonies

Presentado por el comité Judiciary del Senado

Temas:Courts & civil lawCrime & corrections

La misma legislación: SF 233

Dónde está ahora

  1. Hecho: Presentado8 de febrero de 2023
  2. Hecho: Subcomité9 de febrero de 2023
  3. Hecho: Comité del Senado6 de marzo de 2023
  4. Hecho: Lo aprueba el Senado22 de marzo de 202337–13
  5. Hecho: Comité de la Cámara14 de marzo de 2024
  6. Se detuvo: Lo aprueba la CámaraMurió al terminar la Asamblea General
  7. Sigue: A gobernador(a)
  8. Sigue: Firmado como ley

Murió al terminar la sesión La sesión de 2024 terminó el 19 de abril de 2024, la última sesión ordinaria de la Asamblea General. Los proyectos que no pasaron por ambas cámaras murieron. ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?

Qué contiene

Resumen con IA This bill changes several rules regarding criminal cases, including how evidence is shared and how much bail costs for certain violent crimes. It updates laws for no-contact orders, victim rights, and how courts handle recorded statements from children. Additionally, it sets new limits on when defendants can access private records from doctors or lawyers and establishes minimum bond amounts for specific felonies. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1

Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)

This bill relates to criminal law including the disclosure of a defendant’s privileged records, no-contact orders, commencement limitations for certain sexual offenses, sexually predatory offenses, victim rights, discovery, postconviction relief actions, criminal appeals, and pretrial bond amounts for certain felonies. DIVISION I —— COMMUNICATIONS IN PROFESSIONAL CONFIDENCE. Under current law, a practicing attorney, counselor, physician, surgeon, physician assistant, advanced registered nurse practitioner, mental health professional, or the stenographer or confidential clerk of any such person, who obtains information by reason of the person’s employment, or a member of the clergy, shall not be allowed, in giving testimony, to disclose any confidential communication properly entrusted to the person. 10 shall not be construed to authorize or require the disclosure of any privileged records to a defendant in a criminal action unless either the privilege holder waives the confidentiality privilege or the defendant seeking access to privileged records files a motion demonstrating in good faith a reasonable probability that the information sought is likely to contain exculpatory information that is not available from any other source and for which there is a compelling need for the defendant to present a defense in the case. The bill defines “exculpatory information” to mean only information that tends to negate the guilt of the defendant and not information that is merely impeaching or substantially cumulative. DIVISION II —— NO-CONTACT ORDERS. Current law provides that upon the filing of an application by the state or by the victim of any public offense, the court shall modify and extend the no-contact order for an additional period of five years, unless the court finds that the defendant no longer poses a threat to the safety of the victim, persons residing with the victim, or members of the victim’s family. The bill provides that the court shall modify and extend the no-contact order upon the expiration of the no-contact order for an additional period of years, unless, upon the filing of an application by the defendant within days prior to the expiration of a modified no-contact order, the court finds that the defendant no longer poses a threat to the safety of the victim, persons residing with the victim, or members of the victim’s family. If the defendant files an application to modify or terminate a no-contact order, the court shall notify the victim at the victim’s last known address and afford the victim a reasonable opportunity to be heard. DIVISION III —— LIMITATION OF CRIMINAL ACTIONS INVOLVING CERTAIN SEXUAL OFFENSES.3(1)(d). DIVISION IV —— SEXUALLY PREDATORY OFFENSES.10(2) to the list of violations that constitute a “sexually predatory offense”. That subsection provides that a person commits a class “D” felony when, without authority and with the intent to commit an illegal sex act upon or sexual exploitation of a minor under the age of 16, the person entices or attempts to entice a person reasonably believed to be under the age of 16. DIVISION V —— VICTIM RIGHTS. The bill provides that a local police department or county sheriff’s department shall provide a victim with a pamphlet explaining the victim’s rights as a victim of a public offense or delinquent act. The bill provides that it is the public policy of the state that statements made by children to forensic interviewers at child advocacy centers and child protection centers are presumptively reliable and should be admitted into evidence in the courts. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a court shall admit a recorded statement into evidence upon motion by a party if the recorded statement is made by a child under the age of years; the recorded statement describes conduct that violates Code chapter 709 (sexual abuse); the recorded statement was obtained by a forensic interviewer employed by an accredited child advocacy center or child protection center; the interview was conducted substantially in accordance with a nationally recognized protocol for interviewing children; and if offered in a criminal proceeding, the child testifies at trial, the child has been questioned by the defendant or the defendant’s attorney at a deposition or any substantially similar setting, the child is unavailable as a witness, or the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the child would suffer significant emotional or psychological trauma from testifying in the personal presence of the defendant at the time of the criminal proceeding. The bill provides that a court may deny admission of a recorded statement only if the party opposing admission proves by clear and convincing evidence that the recorded statement is unreliable. Portions of a recorded statement may be redacted by agreement of the parties, by order of the court, or if the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that redaction is necessary to either minimize embarrassment or trauma to the child or to effectuate a provision of the Iowa rules of evidence other than the rules of evidence against hearsay. DIVISION VI —— DISCOVERY. The bill provides that discovery depositions shall not be permitted in any criminal action except upon application to the court and a showing of exceptional circumstances. The bill provides that a criminal defendant shall file a written list of all witnesses expected to be called for the defense at the time the defendant requests or receives discretionary discovery from the state, the date when any approved deposition is taken, or days prior to trial, whichever date is earliest. If the defendant does not disclose to the prosecuting attorney all of the defense witnesses, the court shall order the exclusion of the testimony of any such witnesses, absent good cause shown. The bill provides that a person who is not yet a party to a criminal action shall not be permitted to file an application with the court to depose another person until such time as the person is charged with or indicted for the associated criminal offense. DIVISION VII —— POSTCONVICTION RELIEF AND DISCOVERY PROCEDURE.7A.7A provides that Code chapter 822 (postconviction relief procedure) is intended to provide a limited scope of discovery that is no broader than what is afforded to a defendant in a criminal action.412 shall not be discoverable or admissible in a postconviction relief action; the state shall not be required to produce copies of discovery that was previously disclosed to an applicant in the underlying criminal action or a previous postconviction relief action or which was possessed by the applicant in the underlying criminal action or a previous postconviction relief action; the state shall not be required to produce any discovery contained in a court file accessible to the applicant; the state shall not be required to produce any discovery that cannot lawfully be disseminated or that is otherwise made confidential by law; and an applicant shall not be permitted to conduct discovery or seek the appointment of an expert witness through ex parte communication or in camera review. DIVISION VIII —— CRIMINAL APPEALS. The bill provides that discretionary review for an appeal may be available for a sentence following a guilty plea if the defendant can demonstrate to the appellate court that the district court more likely than not abused its discretion at sentencing, but does not apply in cases of a plea agreement, a mandatory sentence, or a sentence entered pursuant to a recommendation made by the defendant or the defendant’s attorney. The bill provides that an appellate court shall not vacate a criminal judgment on direct appeal based upon errors that were not preserved at the district court. This limitation includes but is not limited to the requirement that a specific motion for judgment of acquittal be made to preserve a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence and the requirement that a specific motion in arrest of judgment be made in order to challenge a guilty plea. DIVISION IX —— PRETRIAL BOND FOR CLASS “A” AND FORCIBLE FELONIES. The bill provides that for certain violent offenses, a court setting bond must give significant consideration to the danger a defendant poses to another person or the property of another if the defendant is not detained pending trial.2 (bail and bail restrictions) and making a finding on the record, the following shall be presumed to be the minimum pretrial bond amounts for each count charged notwithstanding any other provision of law: for a class “A” felony, a $500,000 bond; for a class “B” forcible felony, a $25,000 bond; for a class “C” forcible felony, a $10,000 bond; and for a class “D” forcible felony, a $5,000 bond. The bill provides that the court shall require the execution of a bail bond with sufficient surety or the deposit of cash in lieu of bond.

Cambiado después por la enmienda S-3100; vea Enmiendas.

Texto completo del proyecto (en inglés)2

House subcommittee

Named February 21, 2024. On February 26, 2024 it recommended passage. Vote Total: 2-1.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

1 comentario público por escrito a su subcomité: 27 de marzo de 2023 (1) · en el sitio de la Legislatura

Nota fiscal

Resumen con IA This bill changes rules regarding criminal procedure, including how no-contact orders are extended and the statute of limitations for certain sexual offenses. The Judicial Branch expects to incur increased costs of approximately $557,000 per year from fiscal year 2024 to fiscal year 2028 due to the workload of extending no-contact orders. The fiscal impacts for other parts of the bill, such as changes to the statute of limitations and potential increases in no-contact order violations, cannot be estimated. (en inglés)3

Lea la nota fiscal (en inglés)

Description

Senate File 525 relates to criminal law, including the disclosure of a defendant’s privileged records, no-contact orders, commencement limitations for certain sexual offenses, sexually predatory offenses, victim rights, discovery, postconviction relief actions, criminal appeals, and pretrial bond amounts for certain felonies.

Division I — Communications in Professional Confidence

Description and Background

Division I limits the definition of “exculpatory information” under Iowa Code section 622.10 to information that tends to negate the guilt of the defendant and not information that is substantially cumulative.

Under Iowa Code section 622.10, individuals of certain professions who obtain information by reason of the individual’s employment are not allowed in giving testimony to disclose any confidential communication properly entrusted to the person. The confidentially privilege is absolute with regard to a criminal action, and the disclosure of any privileged records to a defendant is not authorized or required in a criminal action unless either of the following occurs:

  • The privilege holder waives the confidentiality privilege.
  • The defendant seeking access to privileged records files a motion demonstrating in good faith a reasonable probability that the information sought is likely to contain exculpatory information that is not available from any other source and for which there is a compelling need for the defendant to present a defense in the case.

Fiscal Impact

Division I is not estimated to have a fiscal impact.

Division II — No-Contact Orders

Description

Division II relates to the modification and extension of no-contact orders. Under Division II, when a no-contact order expires, the court must modify and extend the no-contact order for an additional five years unless the defendant files an application within 90 days prior to the expiration, and the court finds that the defendant no longer poses a threat to the safety of the victim, persons residing with the victim, or members of the victim’s family. The number of modifications extending a no-contact order is not limited.

Division II also provides that if the defendant applies to modify or terminate a no-contact order, the court must notify the victim at the victim’s last-known address and afford the victim a reasonable opportunity to be heard.

Background

Under Iowa Code chapter 664A, no-contact orders may be entered by the court for violations or alleged violations involving harassment, stalking, sexual abuse in the first degree, sexual abuse in the second degree, sexual abuse in the third degree, or any other public offense for which there is a victim.

Iowa Code section 664A.8 currently provides that the court is required to modify and extend a no-contact order for an additional five years upon the filing of an application by the State or by the victim within 90 days prior to the expiration of the no-contact order. Upon such an application by the State or the victim, the court is required to modify and extend the no-contact order unless the court finds that the defendant no longer poses a threat to the safety of the victim, persons residing with the victim, or members of the victim’s family. The number of modifications extending a no-contact order is not limited.

Assumptions

  • Based on whether an extension is resisted by the defendant, some no-contact order extensions will require a court hearing and some will not. It is not known what percentage will require a hearing.
  • Some extensions will require minimal court time, but those that involve an application by a defendant and a hearing will require more time. The average court time for each no-contact order extension is not known, but for the purposes of this Fiscal Note, an average of 10 minutes (0.17 hours) is assumed.
  • A no-contact order extension will require the time of a district judge or district associate judge, a court reporter, a judicial specialist, and a clerk of court.
  • The average combined cost per hour for a district judge or district associate judge plus a court reporter, judicial specialist, and clerk of court is $226.
  • There are approximately 14,500 no-contact orders issued each year.
  • Division II will apply to orders that were issued prior to the effective date of the Bill that were initially set to expire after the effective date of the Bill.
  • Approximately 14,500 no-contact orders will be affected by Division II each year from FY 2024 to FY 2028.
  • The extension of a no-contact order for an additional five years will occur indefinitely unless, upon application by the defendant, the court finds that the defendant no longer poses a threat.
  • Beginning in FY 2029, no-contact orders extended under Division II will be up for extension again.
  • There will be fewer no-contact orders eligible for a second extension than a first extension, fewer no-contact orders eligible for a third extension than a second extension, and so on.
  • State Public Defender contract attorneys spend approximately four hours on each claim for a violation of a no-contact order.
  • Contract attorneys are paid $68 per hour for these cases.

Fiscal Impact

Division II is expected to increase the workload of the Judicial Branch. The amount of court time necessary for each no-contact order is unknown, but if an average of 10 minutes per extension is needed, the Judicial Branch expects it will incur increased costs of approximately $557,000 per year from FY 2024 to FY 2028, as shown in Table 1. The Judicial Branch is funded through the General Fund.

Table 1 — Annual Cost to Judicial Branch, FY 2024 to FY 2028 In succeeding fiscal years, no-contact orders that are extended under Division II will be up for extension again, which will increase the number of no-contact orders to be modified and extended each year. For FY 2029 and succeeding fiscal years, this increased number of no-contact orders will lead to higher annual costs than shown in Table 1 for extending no-contact orders. However, the number of no-contact orders that will be eligible for extension starting in FY 2029 and the average court time cannot be estimated, and the total fiscal impact is unknown.

Additionally, the State Public Defender notes that an increased number of no-contact orders may lead to an increase in no-contact order violations. Providing indigent defense to defendants for additional no-contact order violations will increase costs to the Indigent Defense Fund, but the increase in the number of no-contact order violations and the extent of this cost increase cannot be estimated. State Public Defender contract attorney representation will cost approximately $270 per claim for a no-contact order violation.

Division III — Limitation of Criminal Actions Involving Certain Sexual Offenses

Description and Background

Division III adds the following offenses to the list of offenses for which an information or indictment may be commenced at any time after the commission of the offense, when the offense was committed on or with a person who is under the age of 18:

  • Continuous sexual abuse of a child.
  • Kidnapping in the first degree when the person kidnapped, and as a consequence of the kidnapping, is intentionally subjected to sexual abuse.
  • Burglary in the first degree, when the person performs or participates in a sex act with any person which would constitute sexual abuse.

Under Iowa Code section 802.2B, the offenses for which an information or indictment may be commenced at any time after the commission of the offense, when the offense was committed on or with a person who is under the age of 18, currently include lascivious acts with a child, assault with intent to commit sexual abuse, indecent contact with a child, lascivious conduct with a minor, sexual misconduct with a juvenile, child endangerment, and sexual exploitation of a minor.

Continuous sexual abuse of a child and burglary in the first degree are Class B felonies. Kidnapping in the first degree is a Class A felony. A Class B felony is punishable by confinement for no more than 25 years. A Class A felony is punishable by life in prison without the possibility of parole.

Assumptions

  • The following will not change over the projection period: charge, conviction, and sentencing patterns and trends; prisoner length of stay (LOS); revocation rates; plea bargaining; and other criminal justice system policies and practices.
  • A lag effect of six months is assumed from the effective date of this Bill to the date of first entry of affected offenders into the correctional system.No-Contact

Orders Affected Time Required Personnel Cost

Per Hour Total Cost

14,500 0.17 hours $226 $557,000

  • Marginal costs for county jails cannot be estimated due to a lack of data. For purposes of this analysis, the marginal cost for county jails is assumed to be $50 per day.

Correctional Impact

Division III changes the statute of limitations for certain offenses, and the correctional impact cannot be estimated due to a lack of data. This change may increase the number of prison admissions for these offenses, but the extent of that increase cannot be calculated. Refer to the Legislative Services Agency (LSA) memo addressed to the General Assembly, Cost Estimates Used for Correctional Impact Statements, dated January 20, 2023, for information related to the correctional system.

Minority Impact

Division III changes the statute of limitations for certain offenses, and as a result, the Criminal and Juvenile Justice Planning Division of the Department of Human Rights cannot use prior existing data to estimate the minority impact. Refer to the LSA memo addressed to the General Assembly, Minority Impact Statement, dated January 20, 2023, for information related to minorities in the criminal justice system.

Fiscal Impact

The elimination of the statute of limitations for these offenses may increase the number of prosecutions and resulting prison admissions, but the extent cannot be estimated. Any impact to the State General Fund would include operating costs incurred by the Judicial Branch, the Indigent Defense Fund, and the Department of Corrections (DOC). The cost would be incurred across multiple fiscal years for prison and parole supervision. The average State cost per offense for a Class B felony is $14,200 to $46,300. The State cost for a Class A felony must be calculated on an individual basis to determine prison costs. At a minimum, a Class A felony requires two indigent defense attorneys at a cost of approximately $40,200 and includes court time and jury trial costs ranging from $9,900 to $14,100.

Division IV — Sexually Predatory Offenses

Description and Background

Division IV adds enticement of a minor in violation of Iowa Code section 710.10(2) to the definition of a sexually predatory offense.

Under Iowa Code section 710.10(2), enticement of a minor includes when a person, without authority and with the intent to commit an illegal sex act upon or sexual exploitation of a minor under the age of 16, entices or attempts to entice a person reasonably believed to be under the age of 16. This is a Class D felony. A Class D felony is punishable by confinement of up to five years and a fine of at least $1,025 but not more than $10,245.

Under Iowa Code chapter 901A, a person convicted of a sexually predatory offense that is a felony, who has a prior conviction for a sexually predatory offense, must be sentenced to and serve twice the maximum period of incarceration for the offense, or 25 years, whichever is greater. The person's sentence must not be reduced by more than 15.0%. A person convicted of a sexually predatory offense that is a felony who has previously been sentenced by the preceding terms must be sentenced to life in prison.

Assumptions

  • The following will not change over the projection period: charge, conviction, and sentencing patterns and trends; LOS; revocation rates; plea bargaining; and other criminal justice system policies and practices.
  • A lag effect of six months is assumed from the effective date of this Bill to the date of first entry of affected offenders into the correctional system.
  • Marginal costs for county jails cannot be estimated due to a lack of data. For purposes of this analysis, the marginal cost for county jails is assumed to be $50 per day.
  • Admissions include only individuals admitted to DOC supervision whose most serious offense is enticement of a minor.

Correctional Impact

Division IV adds an offense to the definition of a sexually predatory offense, and the correctional impact cannot be estimated. Division IV may increase the LOS under DOC supervision for some individuals convicted of enticement of a minor, but the number of individuals affected and the extent of the increase in LOS cannot be estimated. Individuals who enter DOC supervision for enticement of a minor currently have an estimated LOS of 25.6 months in prison or 27.2 months in Community-Based Corrections (CBC).

Table 2 shows estimates for sentencing to State prison, parole, probation, or CBC residential facilities; LOS under those supervisions; and supervision marginal costs per day for all convictions of Class D felonies. Refer to the LSA memo addressed to the General Assembly, Cost Estimates Used for Correctional Impact Statements, dated January 20, 2023, for information related to the correctional system.

Table 2 — Sentencing Estimates and LOS

Minority Impact

Division IV expands the definition of a sexually predatory offense, and the minority impact cannot be estimated. However, if Division IV increases the LOS under DOC supervision for some individuals convicted of enticement of a minor, it may disproportionately impact African American individuals. Of the 20 convictions under Iowa Code section 710.10(2) in FY 2022, 86.2% involved Caucasian individuals, 7.2% involved African American individuals, and 6.6% involved individuals of other races. Iowa’s population is 84.5% Caucasian, 3.6% African American, and 11.9% other races. Refer to the LSA memo addressed to the General Assembly, Minority Impact Statement, dated January 20, 2023, for information related to minorities in the criminal justice system.

Fiscal Impact

Division IV adds an offense to the definition of a sexually predatory offense, and the fiscal impact cannot be estimated. Currently, it costs the DOC approximately $163,000 to supervise each annual group of admissions to DOC supervision for enticement of a minor under Iowa Code section 710.10(2) across the entire LOS. The cost may increase under Division IV, but the extent cannot be estimated. The average State cost per offense for a Class D felony is $9,500 to $17,400. The estimated impact to the State General Fund includes operating costs incurred by the Judicial Branch, the Indigent Defense Fund, and the DOC. The cost would be incurred across multiple fiscal years for prison and parole supervision.Conviction

Offense Class

Percent

Ordered

to State

Prison

FY 22 Avg

LOS in

Prison in

Months (All Releases) FY 22

Marginal

Cost Per

Day

Prison

Percent

Ordered

to

Probation

FY 22 Avg

LOS on

Probation

in Months FY 22 Avg

Cost Per

Day

Probation

Percent

Sentenced

to CBC

Residential

Facility

FY 22

Marginal

Cost Per

Day CBC

Percent

Ordered

to

County

Jail

Marginal

Cost Per

Day Jail

FY 22

Avg LOS

on

Parole in

Months

FY 22

Marginal

Cost Per

Day

Parole

D Felony (Sex) 76.3% 25.6 $23.42 51.7% 47.3 $7.27 4.2% $20.67 31.4% $50.00 7.0 $7.27 Division V — Victim Rights

Description and Background

Division V provides that statements made by children to forensic interviewers at child advocacy centers and child protection centers should be admitted into evidence in court. Upon motion of a party, and under certain circumstances, the court may admit these recorded statements of a child.

Division V also provides that a local police department or county sheriff’s department must provide a victim with a pamphlet explaining the victim’s rights as a victim of a public offense or delinquent act. Under current law, a local police department or county sheriff’s department must advise a victim of the right to register with the county attorney and must provide a telephone number and Internet site to each victim to register with the automated victim notification system established within the Crime Victim Assistance Division of the Department of Justice.

Assumptions

  • The State Public Defender reports that Division V will lead to increased costs due to the hiring of expert witnesses.
  • The cost to the State Public Defender for hiring an expert witness is approximately $2,400.
  • The State Public Defender estimates that it provides counsel for approximately 520 cases related to sex offenses that involve children each year and that it will utilize an expert witness in 10.0% to 20.0% of these cases.

Fiscal Impact

The State Public Defender expects an increase in the need for expert witnesses under Division V, with an annual fiscal impact of approximately $125,000 to $250,000, depending on the number of cases affected. The State Public Defender also expects that Division V may lead to increased attorney time required in affected cases, but the extent of this increase and the fiscal impact cannot be estimated. The State Public Defender is funded through the General Fund. Division VI — Discovery

Description and Background

Division VI provides the following:

  • Discovery depositions are not permitted in any criminal action except upon application to the court and a showing of exceptional circumstances.
  • A criminal defendant must file a witness list by certain deadlines.
  • A person who is not yet a party to a criminal action is not permitted to file an application with the court to depose another person.

Assumptions

  • Limiting discovery depositions will require State Public Defender attorneys and contract attorneys to conduct additional investigation in the early stages of cases.
  • The State Public Defender reports that 25.0 additional Investigator full-time equivalent (FTE) positions at a cost of $67,000 each will be required to meet the increased investigatory needs.

Fiscal Impact

The State Public Defender estimates that it will require 25.0 Investigator FTE positions at a total cost of $1.7 million to the State Public Defender operating budget, which is funded through the General Fund. Division VI may also require increased attorney time to be spent on each case, but the extent of this cannot be estimated.

Division VII — Postconviction Relief and Discovery Procedure

Description and Background

Division VII provides a limited scope of discovery to postconviction relief proceedings, including the following:

  • Discovery may only be conducted by order of the court granted upon a showing that the information sought is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence to support or defeat a claim that is adequately pled in the application and, if taken as true, constitutes a colorable claim for relief.
  • An applicant is not permitted to depose or conduct discovery involving a victim unless the applicant proves various factors by clear and convincing evidence.
  • Division VII provides an exception to the attorney-client privilege in Iowa Code section 622.10.
  • Evidence that would be excluded in a criminal action pursuant to Rule of Evidence 5.412 is not discoverable or admissible in a postconviction relief action.
  • The State is not required to produce copies of discovery previously disclosed to or possessed by an applicant, contained in a court file accessible to the applicant, or that cannot be lawfully disseminated or that is otherwise confidential by law.
  • An applicant is not permitted to conduct discovery or seek the appointment of an expert witness through ex parte communication or an in camera review.

Assumptions

  • The State Public Defender reports that Division VII may result in additional appeals of postconviction relief proceedings, but the number of additional appeals cannot be estimated.
  • Each appeal will cost approximately $1,700 to the Indigent Defense Fund.
  • The State Public Defender paid 436 postconviction relief claims in FY 2022.

Fiscal Impact

The State Public Defender expects that it will incur costs for additional appeals resulting from the provisions of Division VII. The number of additional appeals and total fiscal impact to the

Cómo leer una nota fiscal4

Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)

Crea§811.1B§813A.1§814.20A§822.7A

Modifica§622.10§664A.8§802.2B§802.2C§814.6§822.7§901A.1§915.11§915.38

Cómo funciona el Código5

Cabildeo

8 a favor · 2 en contra · 4 indecisos · Quiénes →

Family tree