Proyectos de ley › 90.ª Asamblea General
Prohibiting a court from ordering payment of a postsecondary education subsidy for a child under a dissolution of marriage temporary order or final judgment or decree, and providing for application to existing orders, judgments, and decrees
Presentado por el comité Judiciary del Senado
Temas:Courts & civil lawHigher education
La misma legislación: SF 17
Dónde está ahora
- Hecho: Presentado9 de enero de 2023
- Hecho: Subcomité10 de enero de 2023
- Hecho: Comité del Senado22 de febrero de 2023
- Hecho: Lo aprueba el Senado21 de marzo de 202334–15
- Se detuvo: Comité de la CámaraMurió al terminar la Asamblea General
- Sigue: Lo aprueba la Cámara
- Sigue: A gobernador(a)
- Sigue: Firmado como ley
Murió al terminar la sesión La sesión de 2024 terminó el 19 de abril de 2024, la última sesión ordinaria de la Asamblea General. Los proyectos que no pasaron por ambas cámaras murieron. ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?
Qué contiene
Resumen con IA When people get divorced, courts will no longer be allowed to order one person to pay for another person's college or higher education costs. This change applies to any divorce cases being handled or decided on or after July 1, 2023. Any existing orders for education payments made before that date will stay exactly as they are. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1
Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)
This bill eliminates the current option for a court to order a postsecondary education subsidy and instead prohibits a court from ordering the payment of a postsecondary education subsidy by parties to a dissolution of marriage. The bill also provides that the bill applies to a support order, decree, or judgment entered or pending on or after July 1, 2023, and that the bill shall not be the basis for modification of an order, decree, or judgment entered before July 1, 2023, that provides for a postsecondary education subsidy.
Cambiado después por la enmienda S-3088; vea Enmiendas.
House subcommittee
Named March 12, 2024. On March 13, 2024 it recommended passage. Vote Total: 2-1.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)
Cabildeo
5 a favor · 0 en contra · 3 indecisos · Quiénes →
Family tree
90th General Assembly
Picked up later
Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.
Similar bills
- SF 241 Prohibiting a court from ordering payment of a postsecondary education subsidy for a child…91st General Assembly · Renumbered as SF 513Nearly identical
Matched by wording or an identical title.