Proyectos de ley › 90.ª Asamblea General

SF 365Murió al terminar la sesión · 22 de febrero de 2023

Relating to the choice of doctor to treat injured employees under workers’ compensation laws and including effective date and applicability provisions

Temas:Health careInsuranceJobs & workers

Dónde está ahora

  1. Hecho: Presentado22 de febrero de 2023
  2. Se detuvo: SubcomitéMurió al terminar la Asamblea General
  3. Sigue: Comité del Senado
  4. Sigue: Lo aprueba el Senado
  5. Sigue: Comité de la Cámara
  6. Sigue: Lo aprueba la Cámara
  7. Sigue: A gobernador(a)
  8. Sigue: Firmado como ley

Murió al terminar la sesión La sesión de 2024 terminó el 19 de abril de 2024, la última sesión ordinaria de la Asamblea General. Los proyectos que no pasaron por ambas cámaras murieron. ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?

Qué contiene

Resumen con IA Under this law, employers generally get to choose which doctor treats an employee for a work injury. However, workers can pick a specific primary care doctor ahead of time if that doctor already has their medical records. Employers must tell their workers about this choice when they are hired and whenever an injury happens. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1

Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)

This bill relates to the choice of a physician to treat an injured employee under the state’s workers’ compensation laws. The bill allows the employer to choose care unless the employee has predesignated a physician as provided in the bill. The bill gives an employee the right to predesignate a physician who is a primary care provider, who has previously provided treatment to the employee and has retained the employee’s medical records, to provide treatment for a work-related injury. The employer is required to provide written notice to employees of this right upon hire, and periodically during employment, and upon receiving notice of an injury from an employee who has not yet predesignated a physician of the employee’s right to do so, in a manner prescribed by the workers’ compensation commissioner. An employer or an employer’s insurer shall not coerce or otherwise attempt to influence an injured employee’s choice of a physician. If the employer fails to provide such notification, an injured employee has the right to choose any physician to provide treatment for the work-related injury and that treatment shall be considered authorized care. If the employer or employee is dissatisfied with the care chosen by the other party, the dissatisfied party should communicate the basis of dissatisfaction to the other party, in writing if requested, and the parties may agree to alternate care reasonably suited to treat the injury. If the parties cannot agree to such alternate care, the dissatisfied party may make an application for alternate care to the commissioner. An application for alternate care is an original proceeding and is treated as a contested case. A party may request that the hearing be held in person, by telephone, or by audio-video conference. The commissioner is required to issue a decision within working days of receipt of an application if a telephone hearing or audio-video conference hearing is held or within days if an in-person hearing is held. The bill provides that if the employee has chosen care, when it is medically indicated that no significant improvement from an injury is anticipated, the employee may obtain a medical opinion regarding the extent of the employee’s permanent disability. If the employer believes that the evaluation of permanent disability obtained by the employee is too high, the employer has the right to obtain another medical opinion from a physician of the employer’s choosing. The bill takes effect and applies to injuries occurring on or after January 1, 2024.

Texto completo del proyecto (en inglés)2

Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)

Modifica§85.27§85.39

Cómo funciona el Código3

Cabildeo

5 a favor · 0 en contra · 3 indecisos · Quiénes →

Family tree

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.

Tried before

This idea has been filed in 2 earlier General Assemblies. None got through a chamber.

  • HF 123 Relating to the choice of doctor to treat an injured employee under workers’ compensation …
    89th General Assembly · In committee · very similar
    Cleared committee
  • HF 86 Relating to the choice of doctor to treat an injured employee under workers’ compensation …
    88th General Assembly · In committee · very similar
    Cleared committee

Similar bills this General Assembly

  • SF 456 Relating to the choice of doctor to treat injured employees under workers’ compensation la…
    91st General Assembly · In committee
    Very similar

Matched by wording or an identical title.