Proyectos de ley › 90.ª Asamblea General

SF 234Murió al terminar la sesión · 8 de febrero de 2023

Relating to the ownership of dogs, and making penalties applicable

Temas:Crime & correctionsState governmentCities & counties

La misma legislación: HSB 152, SSB 1195, SF 476, HF 651

Escriba a sus legisladores sobre esto

También incluye HSB 152 y SSB 1195 y SF 476 y HF 651.

Dónde está ahora

  1. Hecho: Presentado8 de febrero de 2023
  2. Hecho: Subcomité8 de febrero de 2023
  3. Hecho: Comité del Senado1 de marzo de 2023
  4. Se detuvo: Lo aprueba el SenadoMurió al terminar la Asamblea General
  5. Se saltó: Comité de la CámaraSe saltó
  6. Hecho: Lo aprueba la Cámara11 de abril de 202382–16
  7. Sigue: A gobernador(a)
  8. Sigue: Firmado como ley

Murió al terminar la sesión La sesión de 2024 terminó el 19 de abril de 2024, la última sesión ordinaria de la Asamblea General. Los proyectos que no pasaron por ambas cámaras murieron. ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?

Qué contiene

Resumen con IA New rules would change how dogs are classified as property and lower the age at which they must be vaccinated against rabies. The bill also limits when police officers can kill a dog and prevents cities or counties from banning specific dog breeds or physical traits. People who own dogs older than four months without rabies shots could face a misdemeanor charge. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1

Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)

This bill relates to the ownership of dogs. Under current law, a dog is deemed property if the dog is under six months of age or if the dog is at least six months of age and wearing a collar with a valid rabies vaccination tag attached to the collar. A person is prohibited from owning or having in possession a dog that is at least six months of age if the dog has not been vaccinated against rabies. The bill instead states that a dog is deemed property if the dog is less than four months of age or certain evidence exists to demonstrate ownership. A person is prohibited from owning or having in possession a dog that is at least four months of age if the dog has not been vaccinated for rabies. By operation of law, a person who owns or possesses a dog that is at least four months of age that is not vaccinated against rabies is guilty of a simple misdemeanor. A simple misdemeanor is punishable by confinement for no more than days and a fine of at least $105 but not more than $855. Under current law, a person may lawfully kill any dog for which a rabies vaccination tag is required when the dog is not wearing a collar with a rabies vaccination tag attached. A peace officer has a duty to kill such a dog within the peace officer’s jurisdiction when the jurisdiction does not otherwise provide for the seizure and impoundment of dogs. If a dog is wearing a collar with a rabies vaccination tag attached, a person may lawfully kill the dog if the dog is chasing, maiming, or killing any domestic animal or fowl, or when the dog is attacking or attempting to bite a person. A dog running at large shall be impounded by a local board of health or law enforcement official if the dog is not wearing a valid rabies vaccination tag or a rabies vaccination certificate is not presented to the local board of health or law enforcement official. The bill instead authorizes only a peace officer to kill a dog within the peace officer’s respective jurisdiction if such jurisdiction has not otherwise provided for the seizure and impoundment of dogs or, if the jurisdiction has provided for the seizure and impoundment of dogs, no temporary housing can reasonably be secured in or near the jurisdiction. The bill does not authorize a peace officer to kill a dog that is under the control of the owner or an agent of the owner. However, any person may kill a dog that is chasing, maiming, or killing any domestic animal or fowl, or when the dog is attacking or attempting to bite a person, regardless of whether the dog is wearing a collar with a rabies vaccination tag attached. The bill authorizes a designated agent of a local board of health or law enforcement official to impound a dog running at large. The bill prohibits a county or city from adopting, enforcing, or otherwise administering an ordinance, motion, resolution, or amendment that restricts or hinders a person’s right to own or keep a dog based on the breed, perceived breed, or physical characteristics of the dog, but does not inhibit the authority of a county or city to adopt, enforce, or administer an ordinance, motion, resolution, or amendment that applies to all dogs.

Cambiado después por la enmienda H-1195; vea Enmiendas.

Texto completo del proyecto (en inglés)2

Senate subcommittee

Named February 14, 2023. It hasn’t reported yet.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)

Modifica§351.25§351.26§351.27§351.33§351.37§351.45§364.3

Deroga§351.29

Cómo funciona el Código3

Cabildeo

4 a favor · 4 en contra · 16 indecisos · Quiénes →

Family tree

Tried before

This idea has been filed in an earlier General Assembly. None got through a chamber.

  • SF 143 Prohibiting a county or city from adopting, enforcing, or administering legislation specif…
    89th General Assembly · In committee · similar
    Cleared committee
  • HF 2211 Prohibiting a county or city from adopting, enforcing, or administering legislation specif…
    89th General Assembly · In committee · similar
    Cleared committee

Similar bills this General Assembly

  • HF 191 Prohibiting a county or city from adopting, enforcing, or administering legislation specif…
    90th General Assembly · In committee
    Similar

Matched by wording or an identical title.