Proyectos de ley › 90.ª Asamblea General

Creating a capital murder offense by establishing the penalty of death for murder in the first degree offenses involving kidnapping and sexual abuse offenses against the same victim who is a minor, providing penalties, and including effective date and applicability provisions

Temas:Crime & corrections

La misma legislación: SF 357

Dónde está ahora

  1. Hecho: Presentado9 de enero de 2023
  2. Hecho: Subcomité10 de enero de 2023
  3. Hecho: Comité del Senado21 de febrero de 2023
  4. Se saltó: Lo aprueba el SenadoSigue como SF 357
  5. Sigue: Comité de la Cámara
  6. Sigue: Lo aprueba la Cámara
  7. Sigue: A gobernador(a)
  8. Sigue: Firmado como ley

Ahora es SF 357 → Sigue avanzando con el número nuevo. Ir a SF 357 ¿Qué es el embudo (funnel)?

Qué contiene

Resumen con IA This bill allows for the death penalty in Iowa for certain crimes involving the murder, kidnapping, and sexual abuse of a minor. To receive this sentence, the defendant must be an adult who is not mentally ill or intellectually disabled and played a major role in the crime. If a jury or judge cannot unanimously agree on a death sentence, the person will instead receive life in prison. (Todavía no está traducido al español.)1

Lea la explicación oficial (en inglés)

This bill amends the Iowa criminal code to provide for punishment by death for capital murder committed by a person age or older if the trial jury, or the judge if there is no jury, makes specific findings and whether the jury believes the defendant should be put to death in a separate penalty proceeding held after the close of the initial trial proceeding. Under the bill, a death penalty sentence could be imposed if the person is convicted of the multiple offenses of murder in the first degree, kidnapping in the first, second, or third degree, and sexual abuse in the first, second, or third degree with respect to the same victim, and the victim is a minor. The bill provides that in order to receive a sentence of death, the defendant must be at least years of age at the time the murder in the first degree was committed, must not be mentally ill or intellectually disabled, and must have been a major participant in the commission of the crime or must have shown a manifest indifference to human life. If a person is indigent and is charged with capital murder, payment of costs for two attorneys is authorized. of counsel in death penalty cases. The state public defender is charged with establishing teams of qualified lead and co-counsel for death penalty cases, as well as conducting or sponsoring specialized training programs for attorneys representing persons who may be executed. If a capital murder case proceeds to trial and a notice of intent to seek the death penalty has been filed, in addition to any other defenses which may be presented to the charge, the defendant may raise the issue of intellectual disability or mental illness during the time of filing pretrial motions. Once the evidence is submitted to the jury, the court will instruct the jury, at the defendant’s request, that in considering whether a sentence of death is justified, the race, color, religious beliefs, national origin, sex, or other protected classes under Code chapter 216 of the defendant or of any victim is not to be considered. The supreme court shall collect evidence relating to whether the death sentences imposed are excessive, disproportionate, or imposed under the influence of prejudice at trial which will be available to litigants. The sentence of death is imposed only when the trier of fact (the jury or the court if the defendant has waived the right to a jury trial) unanimously answers two questions affirmatively: (1) whether aggravating circumstances established beyond a reasonable doubt outweigh any mitigating circumstances that may exist; and (2) whether the defendant should be sentenced to death. offense. The sentencing proceeding is conducted separately from the finding of guilt or innocence by the same trier of fact. For the sentencing proceeding, the trier of fact (the jury or the court if the defendant has waived the right to have the jury hear the proceedings) is to weigh any aggravating circumstances established beyond a reasonable doubt by the state against any of the enumerated mitigating circumstances which may be presented by the defendant. Evidence of certain juvenile delinquency adjudications is not admissible in any proceeding to determine the sentence. If the jury fails to agree unanimously on the required affirmative findings, the penalty imposed would be life imprisonment. The death penalty sentence would be reviewed automatically by the supreme court. The supreme court shall review the trial and judgment separately from the sentencing proceeding. If the supreme court finds error in the sentencing proceeding, the supreme court may remand the case back to district court for a new sentencing hearing. The bill requires the supreme court to examine whether the sentence is excessive or disproportionate to penalties in similar cases. If affirmed by the supreme court, the penalty would be accomplished by lethal injection. The bill requires the board of corrections to adopt rules pertaining to executions, including rules pertaining to the witnessing of executions. A person who is sentenced to death, but who is pregnant when the warrant of execution is issued, is not to be executed until the person is no longer pregnant. A procedure is also provided to stay execution of a condemned inmate who becomes mentally ill after conviction but before execution. An employee of the state shall not be required to perform or assist in any execution and shall not be discriminated against for refusing to participate.3. subsection 3, which would relieve a political subdivision from complying with a state mandate if funding for the cost of the state mandate is not provided or specified. Therefore, political subdivisions are required to comply with any state mandate included in the bill. The bill contains severability provisions and takes effect January 1, 2024, and applies only to offenses committed on or after that date.

Texto completo del proyecto (en inglés)2

Senate subcommittee

Named January 10, 2023. On February 15, 2023 it recommended passage. [].

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Nota fiscal

Resumen con IA This bill establishes the death penalty for certain capital murder offenses involving a minor and requires execution by lethal injection. The Department of Corrections would face a one-time cost of at least $3.3 million to build an execution facility, plus recurring costs of $13,900 per execution and a difference in supervision costs of approximately $97,146 per individual. The Office of the State Public Defender expects to spend approximately $2.0 million per individual represented and between $100,000 to $150,000 for specialized attorney training. The fiscal impact to the Judicial Branch for increased court time cannot be determined. (en inglés)3

Lea la nota fiscal (en inglés)

Description

Senate File 357 provides for the death penalty for capital murder committed by a person age 18 or older if the person is convicted of the multiple offenses of murder in the first degree; kidnapping in the first, second, or third degree; and sexual abuse in the first, second, third, or fourth degree with respect to the same victim, and the victim is a minor. The death penalty is required to be conducted by lethal injection.

The Bill provides that if a person is indigent and charged with capital murder, payment of costs for two attorneys is authorized. The Supreme Court is required to establish standards for the competency of counsel in death penalty cases. The State Public Defender is charged with providing or contracting with qualified lead and co-counsel for death penalty cases, as well as conducting or sponsoring specialized training programs for attorneys representing individuals who may be executed. The Bill also provides that if at any point in federal postconviction proceedings an indigent person is not afforded court-appointed counsel, the State must provide counsel to the person if the person is not otherwise represented by legal counsel. The Bill provides for a bifurcated trial for a case in which the death penalty may be imposed. During the first phase, the jury or the court decides only whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty. The second phase is the penalty proceeding in which it is determined whether the defendant will be sentenced to death or to life imprisonment.

The Supreme Court is required to review all judgments and sentences in which the death penalty is imposed.

The Bill establishes provisions related to the sanity of an inmate under the death penalty, including a court determination of sanity. If the individual is suffering from a mental illness which causes the individual to lack the capacity to understand the sentence imposed and participate in legal proceedings, the execution must not take place until after the individual’s capacity is restored.

The Bill takes effect January 1, 2024, and only applies to offenses committed on or after that date.

Background

Murder in the first degree under Iowa Code section 707.2 is a Class A felony. A Class A felony is punishable by lifetime imprisonment.

A conviction for all three applicable crimes against a minor occurs approximately once every 8 to 10 years. None occurred in CY 2021 or CY 2022.

At the end of CY 2020, the death penalty was authorized by 31 states and the federal government. In all 31 states, lethal injection was authorized as a method of execution, but an alternative method of execution was authorized in 15 of these states. The federal government also utilizes lethal injection.

At the end of CY 2020, 2,469 individuals were held under the sentence of death in the United States. During CY 2021, 11 prisoners were executed. Five states and the federal government conducted these executions. All were conducted by lethal injection.

Assumptions

  • The following will not change over the projection period: charge, conviction, and sentencing patterns and trends; prisoner length of stay (LOS); revocation rates; plea bargaining; and other criminal justice system policies and practices.
  • A lag effect of six months is assumed from the effective date of this Bill to the date of first entry of affected offenders into the correctional system.
  • Marginal costs for county jails cannot be estimated due to a lack of data. For purposes of this analysis, the marginal cost for county jails is assumed to be $50 per day.
  • The death penalty will be utilized infrequently.
  • The Department of Corrections (DOC) will incur costs for creating an execution facility.
  • The Department of Administrative Services (DAS) estimates the construction of the execution facility will cost approximately $3.3 million, but costs may be higher.
  • Contracting with an executioner is estimated to cost approximately $5,000 per execution.
  • The execution medication will include pentobarbital, pancuronium bromide, and potassium chloride. The total cost for all three medications is approximately $8,900 per execution.
  • The Bureau of Justice Statistics reports that individuals on death row serve an average of 18.7 years from sentencing to execution.
  • The average LOS for an individual serving life in prison for a Class A felony is 361.0 months.
  • The marginal cost per day in prison is $23.42.
  • The State Public Defender provided the following estimates for each death penalty case:
  • The initial trial will require two attorneys and 5,000 hours total.
  • The hourly rate for contract attorneys that are qualified to handle a death penalty case will be approximately $200 per hour.
  • The initial trial in a similar case without the death penalty would cost the Office at most $200,000.
  • Expert witness fees for the mitigation phase of a death penalty trial will cost approximately $200,000.
  • Initial appeals will cost approximately $200,000, postconviction proceedings will cost approximately $600,000, and the appeal of the postconviction proceeding will cost approximately $200,000.
  • District court and appellate review costs to the Judicial Branch will be higher for death penalty cases than non-death penalty Class A felony cases. The increase in costs to the Judicial Branch cannot be determined, but district court costs are estimated to increase by 50.0% to 188.0%.
  • The average district court cost to the Judicial Branch in judicial officer and court staff time for a Class A felony is approximately $9,900.
  • The multiphase appellate review procedure for death penalty cases would likely require significant Judicial Branch staff time, but the costs for this personnel time cannot be estimated.

Correctional Impact

Senate File 357 is not estimated to have a significant correctional impact because the individuals who would be sentenced to the death penalty would have been serving a life sentence in the State prison system. Additionally, individuals are rarely convicted of all three applicable crimes (kidnapping, sexual abuse, and murder) against a minor in Iowa. Refer to the Legislative Services Agency (LSA) memo addressed to the General Assembly, Cost Estimates Used for Correctional Impact Statements, dated January 20, 2023, for information related to the correctional system.

Minority Impact

The minority impact of Senate File 357 cannot be estimated because the racial breakdown of individuals convicted of all three offenses (kidnapping, sexual abuse, and murder) against a minor is unknown. However, in FY 2022, there were 105 individuals convicted of at least one of the three applicable offenses. Of these 105 individuals, 80.0% were Caucasian, 14.8% were African American, and 5.1% were other races. Iowa’s population is 84.5% Caucasian, 3.6% African American, and 11.9% other races. Additionally, the Bureau of Justice Statistics reports that at the end of CY 2020, approximately 56.5% of individuals under the sentence of death were Caucasian and 41.1% were African American. Of the 11 individuals under the sentence of death who were executed in the United States in CY 2021, 54.5% were African American and 45.5% were Caucasian. Refer to the LSA memo addressed to the General Assembly, Minority Impact Statement, dated January 20, 2023, for information related to minorities in the criminal justice system.

Fiscal Impact

Senate File 357 is estimated to have a fiscal impact to the DOC, the Office of the State Public Defender, and the Judicial Branch. Some of these costs will only be incurred once. Other costs for each individual facing the death penalty will be incurred over multiple years as the trial is held, the sentence is served, and the death penalty is imposed.

Department of Corrections

One-Time Costs — The DOC will incur a one-time cost of at least $3.3 million for an execution facility, which would include a waiting room, viewing room, and execution chamber. Recurring Costs — The DOC will incur costs for each execution. This includes costs for a contract executioner and execution medication, for a total of $13,900 per execution. Additionally, there will be a difference in DOC supervision costs for each individual of approximately $97,000, as shown in Table 1. This would be incurred over multiple years, not at the time of execution. The DOC is funded through the General Fund.

Table 1 — Difference in DOC Supervision Cost Per IndividualLOS (Days) Cost Per Day Supervision Cost Life in Prison 10,973 $23.42 256,988$ Death Row 6,825 $23.42 (159,842) Difference 97,146$

Office of the State Public Defender

The Office of the State Public Defender estimates that it will incur increased costs of approximately $2.0 million for each individual it represents in a death penalty case, as shown in Table 2. These costs will be incurred over multiple fiscal years and will be to the Indigent Defense Fund, which is funded through the General Fund.

Table 2 — Cost Per Individual Represented by the State Public Defender The Office of the State Public Defender also expects to incur approximately $100,000 to $150,000 in expenses for conducting specialized training programs for attorneys representing individuals who are facing the death penalty. This represents the cost to create the training program and conduct it initially. If the Office of the State Public Defender is required to continue to conduct the training in subsequent years, the Office anticipates increased expenses to update and replicate the training each year. These expenses would be to the State Public Defender operating budget, which is funded through the General Fund.

Additionally, the State Public Defender would incur additional expenses when it is required to provide counsel in federal postconviction proceedings, but the extent of these expenses cannot be estimated.

Judicial Branch

The total fiscal impact to the Judicial Branch for the increase in court time needed for death penalty cases cannot be estimated. However, the Judicial Branch is estimated to incur increased district court costs of between $5,000 and $19,000 for each individual on trial who is facing the death penalty. There may also be increased jury costs for the initial trial, but the amount is unknown. Additionally, there will be increased costs associated with the appellate review under the Bill, but the extent of this increase cannot be estimated. The Judicial Branch is funded through the General Fund.Initial Trial $1,000,000 Penalty Phase 200,000 Initial Appeal 200,000 Postconviction Trial 600,000 Postconviction Appeal 200,000 Capital Murder Trial Costs $2,200,000 Estimated Trial Costs Under Current Law 200,000 Additional Cost Per Case $2,000,000 Table 3 summarizes the fiscal impact by agency. All fiscal impacts are to the General Fund. Table 3 — Fiscal Impact of SF 357 by Agency

Sources

  • Department of Corrections
  • Division of Criminal and Juvenile Justice Planning, Department of Human Rights
  • Office of the State Public Defender
  • Judicial Branch
  • Department of Administrative Services
  • U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics

Cómo leer una nota fiscal4

Lo que cambia del Código de Iowa (Iowa Code)

Crea§602.1011§812A.1§814.30§901E.1§902.15§902.16§902.1A§903C.1

Modifica§13B.4§815.10§902.1§904.105

Cómo funciona el Código5

Cabildeo

1 a favor · 14 en contra · 3 indecisos · Quiénes →

Family tree

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.

Tried before

This idea has been filed in 2 earlier General Assemblies. None got through a chamber.

  • SF 82 Creating a capital murder offense by establishing the penalty of death for murder in the f…
    89th General Assembly · In committee · nearly identical
    Cleared committee
  • HF 271 Creating a capital murder offense by establishing the penalty of death for murder in the f…
    89th General Assembly · In committee · very similar
    Cleared committee
  • SF 296 Creating a capital murder offense by establishing the penalty of death for murder in the f…
    88th General Assembly · Renumbered as SF 588 · nearly identical
    Cleared committee
  • HF 62 Creating a capital murder offense by establishing the penalty of death for murder in the f…
    88th General Assembly · In committee · very similar
    Cleared committee

Similar bills this General Assembly

  • SF 320 Creating a capital murder offense by establishing the penalty of death for murder in the f…
    91st General Assembly · Subcommittee recommends passage
    Very similar
  • SSB 3085 SSB 3085
    90th General Assembly · Subcommittee recommends passage
    Very similar

Matched by wording or an identical title.