Bills › 90th General Assembly

HSB 667Died when the session ended · February 6, 2024

HSB 667

Topics:Business & economyState government

Where it is now

  1. Done: IntroducedFebruary 6, 2024
  2. Done: SubcommitteeFebruary 6, 2024
  3. Stopped: House committeeDied when the General Assembly ended
  4. Next: Passes the House
  5. Next: Senate committee
  6. Next: Passes the Senate
  7. Next: To the Governor
  8. Next: Signed into law

Died when the session ended The 2024 session adjourned on April 19, 2024, the General Assembly’s last regular session. Bills that didn’t pass both chambers died. What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

AI summary People who manage public pension plans must vote all shares based only on the best financial interests of the people in those plans. They are not allowed to vote based on social, environmental, or political goals that do not help the plan's finances. The law also requires these managers and their advisors to follow specific rules for documenting their decisions and reporting them to the state.1

Read the official explanation

This bill requires a fiduciary to vote all shares of a pension benefit plan established, maintained, or offered by a public entity solely in the best economic interest of the plan participants and beneficiaries. _____ in the best economic interest of the plan participants and beneficiaries, the vote is in the best interest of the plan participants and beneficiaries. The bill prohibits a fiduciary from voting shares of a plan based on any environmental, social, policy, governance, or ideological goal that is not in the best economic interest of plan participants and beneficiaries. The bill requires a fiduciary to annually report to the treasurer of state any vote inconsistent with the recommendation of an issuer’s board of directors and the economic analysis on which the fiduciary relied. This report must be certified by the fiduciary’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer. The bill also requires a fiduciary to review its economic analysis every three years to ensure that the fiduciary’s models, procedures, and processes predict the best economic interest of the plan participants and beneficiaries. The bill permits a court to award court costs and reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party in a suit concerning fiduciary voting responsibilities. The bill prohibits a proxy advisory firm from providing proxy voting advice regarding shareholder-sponsored proposals to an entity that the state regulates unless the advice is based solely on the best economic interests of the enterprise’s shareholders. If a proxy advisory firm’s advice follows the recommendation of the board of directors of the issuer of the shares or if the proxy advisory firm conducts and documents an economic analysis demonstrating that the vote is in the best economic interest of the plan participants and beneficiaries, then the advice is presumed to be based solely on the best economic interest of the enterprise’s shareholders. A proxy advisory firm must submit an annual report to the treasurer of state disclosing any vote inconsistent with the issuer’s board of directors’ recommendations and the economic analysis on which the proxy advisory firm relied. _____ The bill permits an investor, beneficiary, or participant of a plan to submit a request for the economic analysis conducted for a fiduciary’s vote to the investment company that owns shares of an enterprise regulated by the state or the plan if the individual has reason to believe that shares of the plan have not been voted in the best economic interest of the plan participants and beneficiaries. The investment company or plan must respond in writing within days by providing the requested economic analysis or informing the individual that no economic analysis was conducted or the vote aligned with the recommendation of the board of directors of the issuer of the shares. The investment company or plan must provide such a response without cost up to twice annually per consumer. The bill allows the attorney general to investigate any suspected violations of the bill and to enforce the bill’s provisions by initiating an action in the name of the state and seeking civil penalties for each violation. Each share not voted in the best economic interest of the shareholder qualifies as a separate violation and constitutes irreparable harm. The bill requires civil penalties to be in equity and to not exceed $1,000 per violation. Civil penalties collected under the bill are deposited in the general fund of the state.

Full bill text2

House subcommittee

Named February 6, 2024. It hasn’t reported yet.

Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part

Iowa Code it changes

Creates§12L.1§12L.2§12L.3§12L.4§12L.5

How the Code works3

Lobbying

0 for · 0 against · 4 undecided · Who →

Family tree

Earlier and later bills are matched by wording or an identical title.

Similar bills

  • SSB 1056 Relating to actions regarding the economic interest of enterprise shareholders and partici…
    91st General Assembly · Subcommittee recommends passage
    Very similar
  • HF 721 Relating to the consideration of nonfinancial factors in providing financial services, inc…
    91st General Assembly · In committee
    Very similar

Matched by wording or an identical title.