Bills › 90th General Assembly
HSB 614
Where it is now
- Done: IntroducedJanuary 23, 2024
- Done: SubcommitteeJanuary 24, 2024
- Done: House committeeFebruary 8, 2024
- Skipped: Passes the HouseContinued as HF 2454
- Next: Senate committee
- Next: Passes the Senate
- Next: To the Governor
- Next: Signed into law
Became HF 2454 → Its progress continues under the new number. Go to HF 2454 What’s a funnel?
What’s in it
AI summary Government agencies and local cities cannot pass rules that unfairly limit a person's ability to practice their religion. If a government rule treats religious activities more strictly than non-religious ones, a court must check if there is a very important reason for doing so. People who feel their religious rights have been blocked can sue the government to stop the rule and seek payment for damages.1
Read the official explanation
This bill prohibits a governmental entity from substantially burdening a person’s free exercise of religion. The bill prohibits governmental entities from treating religious conduct more restrictively than any secular conduct of reasonably comparable risk or treating religious conduct more restrictively than comparable secular conduct because of alleged economic need or benefit. Under current law, a court is not required to apply heightened scrutiny when reviewing a law that burdens a person’s exercise of religion when such law is generally applicable. _____ compelling governmental interest test so that the government cannot substantially burden a person’s exercise of religion unless the government demonstrates that applying the law of general applicability is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest and is the least restrictive means of furthering that interest. The bill provides that a person whose exercise of religion has been substantially burdened by the government may assert such violation as a claim or defense in a judicial or administrative proceeding, and provides that the governmental entity may be liable for actual damages, attorney fees, costs, and other appropriate remedies. The bill also allows the person to obtain injunctive relief against the governmental entity. The bill prohibits a county or city from enacting a private or civil law that would burden a person’s free exercise of religion in violation of the bill. The bill takes effect upon enactment and applies to all state and local laws.
House subcommittee
Named January 24, 2024. On January 30, 2024 it recommended passage. Vote Total: 2-1.
Three legislators hear a bill first and recommend what the committee should do; it’s the best time to weigh in. How to take part
25 written public comments to its subcommittee: January 30, 2024 (1), January 30, 2024 (24) · on the Legislature’s site
Iowa Code it changes
Lobbying
11 for · 18 against · 7 undecided · Who →
Family tree
Study bill
90th General Assembly
Tried before
This idea has been filed in an earlier General Assembly. None got through a chamber.
- HSB 593 HSB 59389th General Assembly · Subcommittee recommends passage · similarCleared committee
- SF 2170 Prohibiting the burdening of a person’s free exercise of religion89th General Assembly · Renumbered as SF 2284 · similarCleared committee
Similar bills this General Assembly
- SSB 1164 SSB 116490th General Assembly · In committeeNearly identical
Matched by wording or an identical title.